Inventing scientific method: The privilege system as a model for scientific knowledge-production

Bibliography

• Ahsmann, Margreet. Collegia en colleges: Juridisch onderwijs aan de Leidse Universiteit 1575–1630 in het bijzonder het disputeren. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera-Osorio, Antonio. Experiencing Nature: The Spanish American Empire and the Early Scientific Revolution. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Berveglieri, Roberto. Inventori stranieri a Venezia, (1474–1788): Importazione di tecnologia e circolazione di tecnici artigiani inventori. Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere e Arti, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, Mario. “From Print to Patents: Living on Instruments in Early Modern Europe”. History of Science 44, no. 2 (2006): 139–186.
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, Mario. “Patent Republic: Representing Inventions, Constructing Rights and Authors”. Social Research: An International Quarterly of Social Sciences 73, no. 4 (2006): 1129–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, Mario. “Patent Specification and Political Representation: How Patents Became Rights.” In Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property, edited by Mario Biagioli, Peter Jaszi, and Martha Woodmansee, 25–40. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Buning, Marius. ‘Privileged Knowledge: Inventions and the Legitimization of Knowledge in the Early Dutch Republic (c. 1585–1621)’. PhD diss., European University Institute, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Coren, Jacob Gerritsz. Observationes rerum in senatu iudicatarum: Item consilia quaedam. The Hague: Aert Meuris, 1633.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Andrew, and Perry Williams. “De-Centring the ‘Big Picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the Modern Origins of Science”. British Journal for the History of Science 26, no. 4 (1993): 407–432. doi: 10.1017/S0007087400031447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine, and Michael Stolleis, eds. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, Karel. “Patents and Patentees in the Dutch Republic Between c. 1580 and 1720”. History and Technology 16, no. 3 (2000): 263–284. doi: 10.1080/07341510008581969
   Google Scholar
• Davids, Karel. The Rise and Decline of Dutch Technological Leadership: Technology, Economy and Culture in the Netherlands, 1350–1800. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, Karel. Zeewezen en wetenschap: De wetenschap en de ontwikkeling van de navigatietechniek in Nederland tussen 1585 en 1815. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. Seaborne. “The Early History of the Patent Specification”. Law Quarterly Review 50 (1934): 86–109, 260–274.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Jan. Economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Jan, and Ad van der Woude. The First Modern Economy: Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan. Simon Stevin. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1943.
   Google Scholar
• Dölemeyer, Barbara, and Heinz Mohnhaupt, eds. Das Privileg im europäischen Vergleich. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1997–1999.
   Google Scholar
• Doorman, Gerard. Octrooien voor uitvindingen in de Nederlanden uit de 16e–18e eeuw: Met bespreking van enkele onderwerpen uit de geschiedenis der techniek. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, Harold. I. The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschelli, Remo. “Lo origini e lo svolgimento del diritto industriale nei primi secoli dell'arte della stampa”. Riv. Dir. Ind. 1 (1952): 151–195.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, James. The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fruin, Robert Jacobus. Geschiedenis der staatsinstellingen in Nederland tot den val der Republiek (2nd rev. ed. by Herman Theodoor Colenbrander, 1922). The Hague: Nijhoff, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, David C. Power and Penury: Government, Technology, and Science in Philip II's Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Haak, Sikko Popta. Paullus Merula, 1558–1607. Zutphen: Thieme, 1901.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, Deborah E. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, John. “Animism and Empiricism: Copernican Physics and the Origins of William Gilbert's Experimental Method”. Journal of the History of Ideas 62, no. 1 (2001): 99–119. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2001.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Thomas A. “Origin and Development of Letters Patent for Invention”. Journal of the Patent Office Society 6 (1924): 405–422.
   Google Scholar
• Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane. Inventions et Inventeurs en France et en Angleterre au XVIIIè siècle. Lille: ANRT, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Höffner, Joseph. Wirtschaftsethik und Monopole im fünfzehnten und sechzehnten Jahrhundert. Jena: Fischer, 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Iliffe, Rob. ‘“In the Warehouse’: Privacy, Property and Priority in the Early Royal Society”. History of Science 30 (1992): 29–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, Jonathan Irvine. Dutch Primacy in World Trade, 1585–1740. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Jonathan Irvine. The Dutch Republic. Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Japikse, Nicolaas, and Hermina Hendrina Petronella Rijperman, eds. Resolutiën der Staten-Generaal van 1576 Tot 1609. 14 vols. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1915–1970.
   Google Scholar
• Kocher, Paul H. “Francis Bacon on the Science of Jurisprudence”. Journal of the History of Ideas 18, no. 1 (1957): 3–26. doi: 10.2307/2707577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubbinga, H.H. “Stevin en Maurits”. De zeventiende eeuw 10, no. 1 (1994): 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, Simon van. Het Rooms-Hollands-regt, waar in de Roomse Wetten met het huydendaagse neerlands regt, in alles dat tot de dagelijkse onderhouding kan dienen, met een bysondre kortheit, so wel in de vaste regts-stoffen, als in de manier van regts-vordering over een gebragt werden. 11th ed. Amsterdam: Dirk Boom, 1744 [1st ed. 1664].
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg David C., and Robert S. Westman, eds. Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• LoevingerLee. “Law and Science as Rival Systems”. Jurimetrics Journal 8 (1966): 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Pamela O. Artisan/Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences, 1400–1600. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Christine. Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mandich, Guilio. “Le privative industriali veneziane (1450–1550)”. Riv. Dir. Ind. 34 (1936): 511–47.
   Google Scholar
• Merula, Paullus. Manier van procederen, in de provintien van Holland, Zeeland ende West-Vriesland, belangende civile zaaken. Delft: Adriaan Beman, 1705.
   Google Scholar
• Molhuysen, Philip Christiaan, ed. Bronnen tot de geschiedenis der Leidsche Universiteit. 1574–[1811]. 7 vols. Rijks Geschiedkundige Publicatiën 20. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1913–1924.
   Google Scholar
• Monté Verloren, Johan Philipde. Hoofdlijnen uit de ontwikkeling der rechterlijke organisatie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden tot de Bataafse omwenteling. Edited by Johannes Emil Spruit. Deventer: Kluwer, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Osler, Margaret J., ed. Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Popplow, Marcus. ‘Models of Machines: A ‘Missing Link’ Between Early Modern Engineering and Mechanics?’ Preprint no. 225 of the Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Roy. “The Scientific Revolution: A Spoke in the Wheel?” In Revolution in History, edited by Roy Porter and Mikuláš Teich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, Nicolaas Wilhelmus. Bronnen tot de geschiedenis van de Leidsche Textielnijverheid. 6 vols. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1910–1922.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, Nicolaas Wilhelmus. De neringen in de Republiek. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers-Maatschappij, 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Quaritsch, Helmut. Staat und Souveränität. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Lissa, Simon Schaffer, and Peter Robert Dear, eds. The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialisation. History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands 9. Amsterdam: KNAW, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roover, Raymondde. “Monopoly Theory Prior to Adam Smith: A Revision”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 65, no. 4 (1951): 492–524. doi: 10.2307/1882577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seckelmann, Margrit. Industrialisierung, Internationalisierung und Patentrecht im Deutschen Reich, 1871–1914. Recht in Der Industriellen Revolution 2. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Barbara J. “The Concept “Fact”: Legal Origins and Cultural Diffusion”. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies 26, no. 1 (1994): 1–25. doi: 10.2307/4052096
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Barbara J. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Barbara J. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-century England: A Study of the Relationships Between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Silberstein, M. Erfindungsschutz und merkantilistische Gewerbeprivilegien. Winterhur: PG Keller, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stevin, Hendric. Wisconstich filosofisch bedryf. Leyden: P. de Cro-Y, 1667.
   Google Scholar
• Stevin, Simon. Principal Works of Simon Stevin. Engineering, Music, Civic life, vol. 5. Edited by R. J Forbes, A. D Fokker, and Annie Romein-Verschoor. 5 vols. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1966.
   Google Scholar