“The minde is matter moved”: Nehemiah Grew on Margaret Cavendish

Bibliography

• Akkerman, Nadine, and Marguérite Corporaal. “Mad Science Beyond Flattery: The Correspondence of Margaret Cavendish and Constantijn Huygens.” Early Modern Literary Studies 14, no. 2 (2004): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Andrault, Raphaële. “What is Life? A Comparative Study of Ralph Cudworth and Nehemiah Grew.” In The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Ohad Nachtomy and Justin Smith, 29–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. De memoria et reminiscentia. Edited by Jacobus de Venetiis. Turnhour: Brepol 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, Paul. “Notions in Garrison: the Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book.” In New Ways of Looking at Old Texts: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1985–1991, edited by William S. Hill, 141–147. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. “Humanist Methods in Natural Philosophy: The Commonplace Book.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53, no. 4 (1992): 541–551. doi: 10.2307/2709935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Ann. The Theatre of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, David. Aristotle on Memory and Recollection: Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Deborah. “Margaret Cavendish on Perception, Self-Knowledge, and Probable Opinion.” Philosophy Compass 10, no. 7 (2015): 438–450. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, Jacqueline. “Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: Science, Religion, and Witchcraft.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38, no. 3 (2007): 493–505. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavendish, Margaret. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by Eileen O’Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cavendish, Margaret. Philosophical and Physical Opinions. London, 1655.
   Google Scholar
• Cavendish, Margaret. The World’s Olio. London, 1655.
   Google Scholar
• Charleton, Walter. A Ternary of Paradoxes: The Magnetick Cure of Wounds. Nativity of Tartar in Wine. Image of God in man. London, 1650.
   Google Scholar
• Clucas, Stephen. “‘A Double Perception in All Creatures’: Margaret Cavendish’s Philosophical Letters and Seventeenth-Century Natural Philosophy.” In God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish, edited by Brandie Siegfried and Lisa Sarasohn, 121–139. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Francis J. History of Comparative Anatomy: From Aristotle to the Eighteenth Century. London: Macmillan, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cottegnies, Line. “Le ‘renouveau’ De L’épicurisme En Angleterre Au Milieu Du Dix-septième Siècle De Walter Charleton À Margaret Cavendish – Une Histoire Franco-britannique.” Études Épistémè 14 (2008): 123–173.
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London, 1678.
   Google Scholar
• Cunning, David. “Cavendish on the Intelligibility of the Prospect of Thinking Matter.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 23, no. 2 (2006): 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cunning, David. Cavendish. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Delaporte, François. Nature’s Second Kingdom: Explorations of Vegetality in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Des Chene, Dennis. Life’s Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Detlefsen, Karen. “Atomism, Monism, and Causation in the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 3, edited by Daniel Garber and Steven Nadler, 199–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Detlefsen, Karen. “Margaret Cavendish and Thomas Hobbes on Freedom, Education, and Women.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Joanne H. Wright and Nancy Hirschmann, 149–168. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Detlefsen, Karen. “Reason and Freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89, no. 2 (2007): 157–191. doi: 10.1515/AGPH.2007.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, Stewart. “Debating Materialism: Cavendish, Hobbes, and More.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2012): 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Robert. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists: A Study of Scientific Ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• French, Roger. William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, Gideon. Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton: On the Genesis of the Mechanistic World View. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Galen. On the Natural Faculties. Translated by Arthur J. Brock. London: W. Heinemann, 1916.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Catherine. “Embracing the Absolute: The Politics of the Female Subject in Seventeenth-Century England.” Genders 1 (1988): 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Brian. “Vitalism and Teleology in the Natural Philosophy of Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712).” The British Journal for the History of Science 36, no. 1 (2003): 63–81. doi: 10.1017/S0007087402004909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglioni, Guido. “Anatomist Atheist? The ‘Hylozoic’ Foundations of Francis Glisson’s Anatomical Research.” In Religio Medici: Medicine and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England, edited by Peter O. Grell and Andrew Cunningham, 115–135. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Giglioni, Guido. “Francis Glisson’s Notion of Confœderatio Naturæ in the Context of Hylozoistic Corpuscularianism.” Revue d’histoire des sciences 55, no. 2 (2002): 239–262. doi: 10.3406/rhs.2002.2151
   Google Scholar
• Giglioni, Guido. “What Ever Happened to Francis Glisson? Albrecht Haller and the Fate of Eighteenth-Century Irritability.” Science in Context 21, no. 4 (2008): 465–493. doi: 10.1017/S0269889708001920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisson, Francis. From Anatomia Hepatis (the Anatomy of the Liver), 1654. Edited by Andrew Cunningham. Cambridge: Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, Anthony. “Les Lieux Communs Chez les Humanistes.” In Lire, Copier, Écrire: les bibliothèques manuscrites et leurs usages au XVIIIe siècle, edited by Elisabeth Décultot, 31–42. Paris: CNRS, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Grew, Nehemiah. British Library, Additional MS 4457.
   Google Scholar
• Grew, Nehemiah. British Library, Sloane MS 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Grew, Nehemiah. The Anatomy of Plants. With an Idea of a Philosophical History of Plants. And Several Other Lectures, Read Before the Royal Society. London, 1682.
   Google Scholar
• Grew, Nehemiah. Cosmologia Sacra: Or a Discourse of the Universe as it is the Creature and Kingdom of God. London, 1701.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Peter. “Reading the Passions: The Fall, The Passions, and Dominion Over Nature.” In The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Stephen Gaukroger, 49–78. London: Routledge, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Michael. “How to Edit a Seventeenth-Century Manuscript: Principles and Practice.” The Seventeenth Century 10, no. 2 (1995): 277–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. “In Dialogue with Thomas Hobbes: Margaret Cavendish’s Natural Philosophy.” Women’s Writing 4, no. 3 (1997): 421–432. doi: 10.1080/09699089700200029
   Google Scholar
• James, Susan. Passion and Action: The Emotion in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Karafyllis, Nicole. “Das Geschlecht der Pflanzen in Antike und Früher Neuzeit: Plurale Transformationen antiker Wissensordnungen in den pflanzenanatomischen Werken von Marcello Malpighi (Bologna) und Nehemiah Grew (London).” In Transformationen der Antike: Transformationen antiker Wissenschaften, edited by Georg Toepfer and Hartmut Böhme, 269–281. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, Marion L., and Paul G. Kuntz. Jacob’s Ladder and the Tree of Life: Concepts of Hierarchy and the Great Chain of Being. New York: Peter Lang, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Le Fanu, William. Nehemiah Grew: A Study and Bibliography of his Writings. Winchester: St. Paul’s Bibliographies, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, Dmitri. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Rhodri. “A Kind of Sagacity: Francis Bacon, the Ars Memoriae and the Pursuit of Natural Knowledge.” Intellectual History Review 19, no. 2 (2009): 155–175. doi: 10.1080/17496970902981652
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Rhodri. William Petty on the Order of Nature: An Unpublished Manuscript Treatise, 1–82. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Louth, Andrew. The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition: From Plato to Denys. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.
   Google Scholar
• Lüthy, Christoph, and William R. Newman. “‘Matter’ and ‘Form’: By Way of a Preface.” Early Science and Medicine 2, no. 3 (1997): 215–226. doi: 10.1163/157338297X00122
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, Crawford. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. The Correspondences of Thomas Hobbes. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Gideon. “Three Biased Reminders about Hylomorphism in Early Modern Science and Philosophy.” In Matter and Form in Early Modern Science and Philosophy, edited by Gideon Manning, 1–32. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. “Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy.” In Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, edited by James Wilberding and Christoph Horn, 103–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelian, Kourken. “Margaret Cavendish’s Epistemology.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, no. 1 (2009): 31–53. doi: 10.1080/09608780802548259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, Dominic. “The Hierarchical Ordering of Reality in Plotinus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, edited by Lloyd Gerson, 66–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Pagel, Walter. “Harvey and Glisson on Irritability with a Note on van Helmont.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 14, no. 6 (1967): 497–514.
   Google Scholar
• Pagel, Walter. William Harvey’s Biological Ideas: Selected Aspects and Historical Background. Basel: Karger, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Katherine. “The Organic Soul.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, edited by Charles Schmitt, Quentin Skinner, Eckhard Kessler, and Jill Kraye, 464–484. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Anne-Lise. “Metaphysical Problems in Francis Glisson’s Theory of Irritability.” In Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Ohad Nachtomy and Justin Smith, 85–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasohn, Lisa. The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Semler, Liam. “The Magnetic Attraction of Margaret Cavendish and Walter Charleton.” In Early Modern Englishwomen Testing Ideas, edited by Jo Wallwork and Paul Salzman, 55–74. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Semler, Liam. “Margaret Cavendish’s Early Engagement with Descartes and Hobbes: Philosophical Revisitation and Poetic Selection.” Intellectual History Review 22, no. 3 (2012): 336–342. doi: 10.1080/17496977.2012.695182
   Google Scholar
• Serjeantson, Richard. “The Passions and Animal Language, 1540–1700.” Journal of the History of Ideas 62, no. 3 (2001): 425–444. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2001.0029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serjeantson, Richard. “The Soul.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, edited by Desmond Clarke and Catherine Wilson, 119–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sorabji, Richard. Aristotle on Memory. London: Duckworth, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, Owsei. “The Classical Roots of Glisson’s Doctrine of Irritation.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38 (1964): 297–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomson, Ann. Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tilmouth, Christopher. “Passion and Intersubjectivity in Early Modern Literature.” In Passions and Subjectivity in Early Modern Culture, edited by Brian Cummings and Freya Sierhuis, 13–22. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, Emma. “Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society.” Notes & Records of the Royal Society of London 68, no. 3 (2014): 245–260. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Emil. Die goldene Kette: Die Aurea Catena Homeri in englischen Literatur von Chaucer bis Wordsworth. Hamburg: Hansischer Gildenverlag, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Richard. “Notebooks as Memory Aids: Precepts and Practice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Memory Studies 1, no. 1 (2008): 115–136. doi: 10.1177/1750698007083894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yolton, John. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar