115
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Painting for the blind: Nathaniel Hone’s portraits of Sir John Fielding

Bibliography

  • Addison, Joseph. “Pleasures of Imagination.” The Spectator no. 411 (1712).
  • Aristotle. De Anima. London: Penguin Books, 1986.
  • Armitage, Gilbert. The History of the Bow Street Runners, 1729–1829. London: Wishart, 1932.
  • Barasch, Moshe. Blindness: The History of a Mental Image in Western Thought. New York: Routledge, 2001.
  • Barker-Benfield, G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
  • Barrell, John. The Political Theory of Painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: “The Body of the Public”. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
  • Beattie, J. M. “Sir John Fielding and the Public Justice: The Bow Street Magistrate’s Court, 1754–1780.” Law and History Review 25, no. 1 (2007): 61–100. doi: 10.1017/S0738248000001061
  • Bew, George. “Observations on Blindness, and on the Employment of the Other Senses to Supply the Loss of Sight.” Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester 1 (1785): 159–184.
  • Blacklock, Thomas. “Blind.” In Encyclopaedia Britannica; Or, a Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, &c. Edinburgh, 1778.
  • Blacklock, Thomas. Poems by Mr Thomas Blacklock. To Which Is Prefix’d an Account of the Life, Character, and Writings of the Author. Edited by Joseph Spence. London, 1756.
  • Bolt, David. The Metanarrative of Blindness: A Re-Reading of Twentieth-Century Anglophone Writings. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014.
  • Brown, Christopher, and Hans Vlieghe. Van Dyck 1599–1641. London: Royal Academy Publications, 1999.
  • Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. London, 1759.
  • Butlin, Martin. “An Eighteenth-Century Art Scandal: Nathaniel Hone’s ‘The Conjurer’.” The Connoisseur 174 (1970): 1–9.
  • Chambers, Ephraim. A Supplement to Mr Chambers’ Cyclopaedia. London, 1753.
  • Cheselden, William. “An Account of Some Observations Made by a Young Gentleman, Who Was Born Blind … and Was Couch’d Between 13 and 14 Years of Age.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 35 (1727): 447–450. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1727.0038
  • Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • Cole, Georgina. “Rethinking Vision in Eighteenth-Century Paintings of the Blind.” In Art Theory as Visual Epistemology, edited by Harald Klinke, 47–64. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2014.
  • Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. Treatise on the Sensations, translated by Geraldine Carr. London: Favil Press, 1930.
  • De Bolla, Peter. The Education of the Eye: Painting, Landscape, and Architecture in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
  • Degenaar, Marjolein. Molyneux’s Problem: Three Centuries of Discussion on the Perception of Forms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  • Derrida, Jacques. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. Translated by Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993.
  • Fielding, Sir John. An Account of the Receipts and Disbursements Relating to Sir John Fielding’s Plan for the Preserving of Distressed Boys. London, 1769.
  • Fielding, Sir John. A Plan for a Preservatory and Reformatory, for the Benefit of Deserted Girls, and Penitent Prostitutes. London, 1758.
  • Fielding, Sir John. A Plan for Preventing Robberies Within Twenty Miles of London. London, 1755.
  • Fielding, Sir John. The Universal Mentor; Containing Essays on the Most Important Subjects in Life. London, 1763.
  • Gascoigne, John. “Sensible Newtonians: Nicholas Saunderson and John Colson.” In From Newton to Hawking: A History of Cambridge University’s Lucasian Professors of Mathematics, edited by Kevin C. Knox and Richard Noakes, 171–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • Hartley, David. Observations on Man: His Frame, His Duty and His Expectations. London, 1765.
  • Ingamells, John. National Portrait Gallery: Mid-Georgian Portraits 1760–1790. London: National Portrait Gallery, 2004.
  • Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
  • Kleege, Georgina. “Blind Imagination: Pictures into Words.” Southwest Review 93, no. 2 (2008): 227–239.
  • Kleege, Georgina. “Blindness and Visual Culture: An Eyewitness Account.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis, 522–525. London: Routledge, 2010.
  • Lajer-Burcharth, Ewa. “Pompadour’s Touch: Difference in Representation.” Representations 73, no. 1 (2001): 54–88. doi: 10.1525/rep.2001.73.1.54
  • Larrissey, Edward. The Blind and Blindness in Literature of the Romantic Period. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
  • Lee, Rensselaer. Ut Pictura Poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting. New York: W. W. Norton, 1967.
  • Le Harivel, Adrian. Nathaniel Hone the Elder 1718–1784. Dublin: Town House, Dublin in association with the National Gallery of Ireland, 1992.
  • Leslie-Melville, R. The Life and Work of Sir John Fielding. London: Lincoln Williams, 1934.
  • Levey, Michael. “Van Dyck and the Motif of the Broken Column.” Burlington Magazine 147, no. 1226 (2005): 335.
  • Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Roger Woolhouse. London: Penguin, 1997.
  • Memorandum-Books of Nathaniel Hone, Portrait-Painter and Foundation Member of the Royal Academy, 1752–1754. British Library, Add MS 44024–44025: 1752–1754.
  • Milam, Jennifer. “Fragonard and the Blindman’s Game: Interpreting Representations of Blindman’s Buff.” Art History 21, no. 1 (1998): 1–25. doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00090
  • Milam, Jennifer. Fragonard’s Playful Paintings: Visual Games in Rococo Art. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006.
  • Mirzoeff, Nicholas. “Blindness and Art.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis, 379–390. London: Routledge, 2006.
  • Monbeck, Michael. The Meaning of Blindness: Attitudes towards Blindness and Blind People. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1973.
  • Mullan, John. Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  • Packham, Catherine. “Disability and Sympathetic Sociability in Enlightenment Scotland: The Case of Thomas Blacklock.” Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 30, no. 3 (2007): 423–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-0208.2007.tb00343.x
  • Panofsky, Erwin. Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.
  • Pasquin, Anthony. An Authentic History of the Professors of Painting, Sculpture, & Architecture, Who have Practised in Ireland. London, 1796.
  • Paulson, William. Enlightenment, Romanticism and the Blind in France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.
  • Phillips, Gordon. The Blind in British Society: Charity, State and Community c1780–1830. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.
  • Reid, Thomas. An Enquiry into the Human Mind, on the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh, 1765.
  • Resnik, Judith, and Dennis Curtis. Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011.
  • Reynolds, Sir Joshua. The Discourses of Sir Joshua Reynolds. Edited by John Burnet. London, 1842.
  • Ripa, Cesare. Baroque and Rococo Pictorial Imagery. Edited by Edward A. Maser. New York: Dover, 1971.
  • Ripa, Cesare. Iconologia: Or, Moral Emblems. Translated and edited by Pierce Tempest. London, 1709.
  • Ripa, Cesare. Iconology; Or, a Collection of Emblematical Figures. Edited by George Richardson. 2 vols. London, 1779.
  • Riskin, Jessica. Science in the Age of Sensibility: The Sentimental Empiricists of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2002.
  • Rodas, Julia Miele. “On Blindness.” Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies 3, no. 2 (2009): 115–130. doi: 10.1353/jlc.0.0013
  • Saunderson, Nicholas. Elements of Algebra in Ten Books. Cambridge, 1740.
  • Sheriff, Mary. Fragonard: Art and Eroticism. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990.
  • Sir John Fielding’s Jests; or New Fun for the Parlour or Kitchen. London, 1781.
  • Smith, John Thomas. Nollekens and His Times. London: Henry Coburn, 1829.
  • Styles, John. “Sir John Fielding and the Problem of Criminal Investigation in Eighteenth-Century England.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 33 (1983): 127–149. doi: 10.2307/3678993
  • Taswell, William. “A Full and True Account of a Miraculous Cure of a Young Blind Man in Newington.” In The Tatler, edited by Donald F. Bond, 384–385. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
  • Tilley, Heather. “Frances Brown, the ‘Blind Poetess’: Towards a Poetics of Blind Writing.” Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies 3, no. 2 (2009): 147–161. doi: 10.1353/jlc.0.0017
  • Tunstall, Kate. Blindness and Enlightenment: An Essay. London: Continuum, 2011.
  • Turner, David. Disability in Eighteenth-Century England: Imaging Physical Impairment. London: Routledge, 2012.
  • Weygand, Zina. The Blind in French Society: From the Middle Ages to the Century of Louis Braille. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.
  • Wilson, James. Biography of the Blind. Birmingham: J W Showell, 1838.
  • Zupancic, Alenka. “Philosophers’ Blind Man’s Buff.” In Gaze and Voice as Love Objects, edited by Renata Salecl, and Slavoj Zizek, 32–49. Durham: Durham University Press, 1996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.