Do we have any genuine works by Aristotle? Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s discussion of the corpus Aristotelicum

Bibliography

• Ammonius <Hermiae>. In Aristotelis Categorias commentarius. Edited by Adolf Busse (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, IV.4). Berlin: Reimer, 1894. Reprint [Berlin]: [De Gruyter], 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Ammonius <Hermiae>. In Aristotelis De interpretatione commentarius. Edited by Adolf Busse (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, IV.5). Berlin: Reimer, 1897. Reprint [Berlin]: [De Gruyter], 1960.
   Google Scholar
• <Ps.->Ammonius <Hermiae>. Ammonii Hermiae in Aristotelis Praedicamenta commentaria. Venice: per Ioan. Ant. & Petrum fratres de Nicolinis de Sabio, sumptu Melchioris Sassae, 1545.
   Google Scholar
• <Ps.->Ammonius <Hermiae>. “In Aristotelis Categorias commentarius.” In Ammonii Hermei commentaria in librum Peri hermenias. Margentini archiepiscopi Mitylenensis in eundem enarratio, [part 4]. Venice: apud Aldum, 1503.
   Google Scholar
• Aristaenetus <Nicaenus>. Epistolai erotikai. Tina tōn palaiōn hērōōn epitaphia, e bibliotheca … Jo. Sambuci. Antwerp: ex officina Christophori Plantini, 1566.
   Google Scholar
• Aristoteles. Aristoteles Graece. Edited by Immanuel Bekker, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer, 1831.
   Google Scholar
• Aristoteles. Aristotelis Opera. Vol. 3: Librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Edited by Olof Gigon. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Aristoteles. Aristotelis quae feruntur De plantis, De mirabilibus auscultationibus, Mechanica, De lineis insecabilibus, Ventorum situs et nomina, De Melisso, Xenophane, Gorgia. Edited by Otto Apelt. Leipzig: Teubner, 1888.
   Google Scholar
• <Ps.->Aristoteles. “De plantis.” In De re rustica selectorum libri XX. Graeci, Constantino quidem Caesari nuncupati, ac iam non libris, sed thesauris annumerandi […]. Item, Aristotelis de plantis libri duo Graeci, nuper ab interitu liberati, ac studiosorum usui hac primum editione restituti, edited by Johannes Alexander Brassicanus, 494–551. Basle: [Robert Winter], 1539. Accessed February 5, 2019. http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/0002/bsb00028265/images/.
   Google Scholar
• <Ps.->Aristoteles. “Peplus.” In Aristotelis Stagiritae Pepli fragmentum, sive, Heroum Homericorum epitaphia. Nunc primum autori suo restituta, Latine versa, et annotationibus illustrata, edited by Willem Canter. Basle: per T. Guarinum, 1566. Accessed February 11, 2019. doi:10.3931/e-rara-152.
   Google Scholar
• Athenaeus <Naucratites>. The Learned Banqueters. Vol. 1: Books I–III.106e. Edited by S. Douglas Olson (Loeb Classical Library, 204). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Christian Daniel. Varietas lectionis libellorum Aristotelicorum e codice Lipsiensi diligenter enotata. Leipzig: Sommer, 1793.
   Google Scholar
• Bignone, Ettore. L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Milan: Bompiani, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. Commentaries on Aristotle’s “De interpretatione”. Vol. 2: Pars posterior, secundam editionem et indices continens = Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum “Peri hermeneias”. Edited by Carolus Meiser. Leipzig: Teubner, 1880. Reprint New York; London: Garland, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Cassin, Barbara. “Review of Wiesner (1974).” Gnomon 49 (1977): 773–784.
   Google Scholar
• Cassin, Barabara. Si Parménide. Le traité anonyme De Melisso Xenophane Gorgia (Cahiers de philologie, 4). Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, Luc. “‘Falsissima est ergo haec de triplici substantia Aristotelis doctrina.’ A Sixteenth-Century Critic of Aristotle – Franceso Patrizi da Cherso on Privation, Form, and Matter.” Early Science and Medicine 2 (1997): 227–250. doi: 10.1163/157338297X00131
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, Luc. “Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s Criticism of Aristotle’s Logic.” Vivarium 45 (2007): 113–124. doi: 10.1163/156853407X202539
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, Luc. “‘Wie ein Tintenfisch!’ Francesco Patrizi da Cherso über Aristoteles und die Vorsokratiker.” In Rezeptionen der Vorsokratiker. Festschrift für Georg Wöhrle zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Oliver Hellmann and Benedikt Strobel (Philosophie der Antike. Veröffentlichungen der Karl- und Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung). Stuttgart: Steiner (in press; scheduled for 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited by Tiziano Dorandi (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dirlmeier, Franz. Merkwürdige Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles (Sitzungsberichte Akademie Heidelberg. Philos.-histor. Klasse, 1961:2). Heidelberg: Winter, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Drossaart Lulofs, Hendrik Joan. “Neleus of Scepsis and the Fate of the Library of the Peripatos.” In Tradition et traduction. Les textes philosophiques et scientifiques grecs au Moyen Âge latin. Hommage à Fernand Boissier, edited by Rita Beyers, Jozef Brams, Dirk Sacré, and Koenraad Verrycken (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. De Wulf-Mansion Centre. Series 1, 25), 9–24. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Düring, Ingemar. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius, Johann Albert. Bibliotheca Graeca, sive, Notitia scriptorum veterum Graecorum quorumcumque monumenta integra aut fragmenta edita exstant, tum plerorumque e mss. ac deperditis. 4th ed., 12 vols. Hamburg: C.E. Bohn / Leipzig: Breitkopf-Haertel, 1790–1838. Reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1966–1970.
   Google Scholar
• Flashar, Helmut. “Aristoteles.” In Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, edited by Friedrich Überweg. Vol. 3: Ältere Akademie – Aristoteles – Peripatos, 175–457. Basel; Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co., 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gaiser, Konrad. Platons ungeschriebene Lehre. Studien zur systematischen und geschichtlichen Begründung der Wissenschaften in der Platonischen Schule. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Galenus, Claudius. “In Hippocratis De natura hominis commentarius.” In Claudii Galeni Opera omnia, edited by C. G. Kühn, 20 vols, 15:1–173. Leipzig: Knobloch, 1821–1833. 2nd reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, Richard, et al. “414 Aristote de Stagire.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, edited by Richard Goulet. Vol. 1: Abam(m)on à Axiothéa, 413–590. Paris: CNRS, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, Christel. Definition und Einteilung der Philosophie: von der spätantiken Einleitungsliteratur zur arabischen Enzyklopädie. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Herzhoff, Bernhard J. “Ist die Schrift ‘De plantis’ von Aristoteles?” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption 16 (2006): 69–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. “Pseudo-Aristote, De plantis.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, edited by Richard Goulet, Supplément, 499–505. Paris: CNRS, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Emil. “Francesco Patricio und seine Sammlung griechischer Handschriften in der Bibliothek des Escorial.” Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 25, no. 1–2 (1908): 19–47. Reprint with a different pagination London: Forgotten Books, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Werner W. Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmann, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Werner W. Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Berlin: Weidmann, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Johannes <Philoponus>. Philoponi (olim Ammonii) in Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Edited by Adolf Busse (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, XIII.1). Berlin: Reimer, 1898. Reprint [Berlin]: [De Gruyter], 1960.
   Google Scholar
• King, Colin Guthrie and Roberto Lo Presti, eds. Werner Jaeger. Wissenschaft, Bildung, Politik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Liron, Jean. Les aménités de la critique, ou, Dissertations et remarques nouvelles sur divers points de l’Antiquité ecclésiastique et profane. Paris: Delaulne, 1717.
   Google Scholar
• Moraux, Paul. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen: Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Vol. 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im 1. Jh. v. Chr. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Moraux, Paul. Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain: Editions universitaires de Louvain, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Nicephorus Kallistus <Xanthopoulus>. Ecclesiasticae historiae libri decem & octo … opera vero ac studio … Joannis Langi e Græco in Latinum sermonem translati. Basle: ex officina Joannis Oporini, 1553.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaus <Damascenus>. De plantis: five translations. Edited by Hendrik Joan Drossaart Lulofs and E. L. J. Poortman (Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afd. Letterkunde. Nieuwe Reeks, 139=Aristoteles Semitico-Latinus, [4]). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Nizzoli, Mario. De veris principiis et vera ratione philosophandi. Edited by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Frankfurt: apud Hermannum a Sande, 1670. Accessed February 2, 2019. http://digital.slub-dresden.de/id366725068.
   Google Scholar
• Patrizi, Francesco. Discussionum Peripateticarum tomi quattuor, quibus Aristotelicae philosophiae universa historia atque dogmata cum veterum placitis collata, eleganter ac erudite declarantur. Basle: ad Perneam Lecythum, 1581. Reprint with an introduction by Zvonko Pandžić (Quellen und Beiträge zur kroatischen Kulturgeschichte, 9). Cologne: Böhlau, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Plutarchus. Lives. Edited by Bernadotte Perrin. Vol. 4: Alcibiades and Coriolanus. Lysander and Sulla (Loeb Classical Library, 80). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1916. Reprint Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Plutarchus. Moralia. Edited by Frank Cole Babbit et al. Vol. 8: Table-talk, edited by Paul A. Clement and Herbert B. Hoffleit (Loeb Classical Library, 424). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969. Reprint Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Porphyrius. “Vita Plotini.” In Plotini Opera, edited by Paul Henry and Hans-Rudolf Schwyzer. Vol. 1:1–38. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Primavesi, Oliver. “Ein Blick in den Stollen von Skepsis. Vier Kapitel zur frühen Überlieferung des Corpus Aristotelicum.” Philologus 151 (2007): 51–77. doi: 10.1515/phil-2007-0105
   Google Scholar
• Reale, Giovanni. “Josef Zürcher e un tentativo di rivoluzione nel campo degli studi aristotelici.” In Il concetto di filosofia prima e l’unità della Metafisica di Aristotele con i testi greci di tutti passi citati (Temi metafisici e problemi del pensiero antico. Studi e testi, 26), 7th ed., 449–487. Milan: Bompiani, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Will F., and Charles B. Schmitt, eds. Pseudo-Aristotle: The Secret of Secrets: Sources and Influences ( Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts, 9). London: The Warburg Institute, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Charles B., and Dilwyn Knox, eds. A Guide to Latin Works Falsely Attributed to Aristotle Before 1500 (Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts, 12). London: The Warburg Institute, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jean-Pierre. “90 Phainias d’Érèse.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, edited by Richard Goulet. Vol. 5.1: De Paccius à Plotin, 266–273. Paris: CNRS, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schönfeld, Andreas, and Rolf Schönberger, eds. Liber de causis=Das Buch der Ursachen. Lateinisch-Deutsch. Frankfurt: Meiner, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Simplicius <Cilicius>. Commentaria in Categorias (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, VIII). Edited by Karl Kalbfleisch. Berlin: Reimer, 1907. Reprint [Berlin]: [De Gruyter], 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Simplicius <Cilicius>. In Aristotelis De caelo commentaria (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, VII). Edited by Johan Ludvig Heiberg. Berlin: Reimer, 1894. Reprint [Berlin]: [De Gruyter], 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, Georg Ludwig. Vindiciae philosophorum Megaricorum tentantur; subicitur commentarius in priorem partem libelli de Xenophane, Zenone et Gorgia. [Berlin]: [s.n.], 1792.
   Google Scholar
• Strabo. Geographica. Edited by Stefan Radt, 10 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002–2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, Jürgen. Ps.-Aristoteles, MXG. Der historische Wert des Xenophanesreferats. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Zürcher, Josef. Aristoteles’ Werk und Geist. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1952.
   Google Scholar