168
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Joseph Priestley and the Argument from Design

Bibliography

  • Abrahams, Harold J. “Priestley Answers the Proponents of Abiogenesis.” Ambix (1964): 44–71. doi: 10.1179/amb.1964.12.1.44
  • Brooke, John H. “Joining Natural Philosophy to Christianity: The Case of Joseph Priestley.” In Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion, edited by John Brooke, and Ian Maclean, 319–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Burrow, J. W. “Editor’s Introduction.” In The Origin of Species, edited by Charles Darwin, and J. W. Burrow. Harmondsworth, 1968.
  • Clarke, Samuel. Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, London, 1705; reprinted Stuttgart, 1964.
  • Darwin, Erasmus. Zoonomia. 3rd edition. London, 1802.
  • Darwin, Erasmus. The Temple of Nature. London, 1803.
  • D’Holbach, Paul [M. de Mirabaud], Système de la Nature, Paris, 1779; The System of Nature, or the Laws of the Moral and Physical World, 2 volumes, translated by Samuel Wilkinson, London: Thomas Davison, 1820.
  • Dybikowski, James. “Joseph Priestley, Metaphysician and Philosopher of Religion.” In Joseph Priestley, Scientist, Philosopher, and Theologian, edited by Isabel Rivers, and David L. Wykes, 80–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Feigenbaum, Ryan. “Visions of Algae in Eighteenth-Century Botany”, Public Domain Review, n.d., https://publicdomainreview.org/2016/09/07/visions-of-algae-in-eighteenth-century-botany/.
  • Fieser, James. ed Early Responses to Hume’s Writings on Religion. 2 vols Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
  • Gregory, T. Ryan. The Argument From Design: A Guided Tour of William Paley’s Natural Theology (1802). Evolution: Education Outreach, 2009, 602–611.
  • Heimann, P. M., and J. E. McGuire. “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1971): 233–306. doi: 10.2307/27757320
  • Hiebert, Erwin N. “The Integration of Revealed Religion and Scientific Materialism in the Thought of Joseph Priestley.” In Joseph Priestley. Scientist, Metaphysician, and Theologian, edited by Erwin N. Hiebert, Aaron J. Ihde, and Robert E. Schofield, 27–61. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1980.
  • Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. London, 1779.
  • Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited by N. Kemp Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1935.
  • Hume, David. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding, 2nd edition edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1902.
  • Hurlbutt, Robert H. Hume, Newton and the Design Argument. revised edition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
  • Kant, Immanuel, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 1781; translated by Norman Kemp Smith, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1933.
  • McEvoy, J. G., and J. E. McGuire. “God and Nature: Priestley’s Way of Rational Dissent.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 6 (1975): 325–404. doi: 10.2307/27757344
  • Mills, Simon. “Joseph Priestley and the Intellectual Culture of Rational Dissent, 1752–1796. “ PhD diss., University of London, Queen Mary, 2009.
  • Paley, William. Natural Theology. London: R. Faulder, 1802.
  • Priestley, Joseph. The History and Present State of Electricity, London: Dodsley, 1767; reprinted Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Priestley, Joseph. Institutes of Natural and Revealed Religion. 2 vols. London: Johnson. 1772–1774.
  • Priestley, Joseph. Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit. London: Johnson, 1777.
  • Priestley, Joseph. The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity Illustrated. London: Johnson, 1777.
  • Priestley, Joseph. A Free Discussion of the Doctrines of Materialism and Philosophical Necessity, in a Correspondence Between Dr Price and Dr Priestley. London, 1778.
  • Priestley, Joseph. Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever. Part I. Containing an Examination of the Principal Objections to the Doctrines of Natural Religion, and especially those contained in the Writings of Mr. Hume. Bath, 1780.
  • Priestley, Joseph. Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever. 1st edition. Birmingham, 1780.
  • Priestly, Joseph. Additional Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever, in Answer to Mr. William Hammon. London, 1782.
  • Priestley, Joseph. Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever. 2nd edition. London: Johnson, 1787. reprinted New York and London: Garland, 1974.
  • Priestley, Joseph. “Observations and Experiments Relating to Equivocal, or Spontaneous, Generation.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 6 (1809): 119–129. doi: 10.2307/1004780
  • Priestley, Joseph. Theological and Miscellaneous Works of Joseph Priestley, LL.D. F.R.S. &c., 25 volumes, edited by John Towill Rutt, London: George Smallfield, 1817–1831; reprinted New York: Garland Press, 1972.
  • Schofield, Robert E. A Scientific Autobiography of Joseph Priestley. Cambridge: Massachusetts, 1966.
  • Schofield, Robert E. “Joseph Priestley: Theology, Physics, and Metaphysics.” Enlightenment and DissenT 2 (1983): 69–82.
  • Schofield, Robert E. The Enlightened Joseph Priestley. A Study of His Life and Work From 1733 to 1804. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.
  • Tapper, Alan. “Priestley on Politics, Progress and Moral Theology.” In Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain, edited by Knud Haakonssen, 272–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • Tapper, Alan. “Joseph Priestley.” In British Philosophers 1500–1799, edited by Philip B. Dematteis, and Peter S. Fosl, Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 252, 307–323. Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli Clark Layman, 2002.
  • Turner, Matthew. [William Hammon], Answer to Dr Priestley’s Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever, London, 1782.
  • Tweyman, Stanley. ed Hume on Natural Religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996.
  • Wunderlich, Falk. “Priestley on Materialism and the Essence of God”, Intellectual History Review, this issue.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.