Superbia, existimatio, and despectus: an aspect of Spinoza’s theory of esteem

Bibliography

• Alanen, Lilli. “Spinoza on Passions and Self-Knowledge: The Case of Pride.” In Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Martin Pickavé, and Lisa Shapiro, 234–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, Etienne. “Jus-Pactum-Lex: On the Constitution of the Subject in the Theological-Political Treatise.” In The New Spinoza, edited by Warren Montag, and Ted Stolze, 171–205. Minneapolis: Universty of Minnesota Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrenghi, Daniela. “Sragionare con la ragione: immaginazione e follia nell’opera di Spinoza.” Etica & Politica 16, no. 1 (2015): 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bove, Laurent. La strategie du conatus. Affirmation et résistance chez Spinoza [The Conatus Strategy. Affirmation and Resistance in Spinoza]. Paris: Vrin, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, Clare. “Spinoza’s Acquiescentia.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55, no. 2 (2017): 209–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2017.0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, Edwin. “The State of Nature and its Law in Hobbes and Spinoza.” Philosophical Topics 19, no. 1 (1991): 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. Passiones animi [The Passions of the Soul]. Amstelodami: Ludovicum Elzevirum, 1650.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Alexander X. “Spinoza’s Unquiet Acquiescentia.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120, no. 2 (2020): 145–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoaa008.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Aaron. “Spinoza as Natural Lawyer.” Cardozo Law Review 25, no. 2 (2003): 627–641.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Keith. “Spinoza on Self-Hatred.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 65, no. 1 (2016): 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. The English and the Latin Texts. Edited by Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• James, Susan. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantal. “Longing (Desiderium) for Vengeance as the Foundation of the Commonwealth.” In Spinoza’s ‘Political Treatise’. A Critical Guide, edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed, and Hasana Sharp, 78–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, Chantal. “Religion et politique chez Spinoza: Une logique de l’accommodement.” La Pensée, no. 398 (2019): 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kambouchner, Denis. “Spinoza et le Problème de l’Abjectio.” In Emotional Minds. The Passions and the Limits of Pure Inquiry in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Sabrina Ebbersmeyer, 105–119. Berlin: W. De Gruyter, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Klever, Wim. “The Truth of Error: A Spinozistic Paradox.” In Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind, edited by Yirmiyahu Yovel, and Gideon Segal, 111–128. Leiden: Brill, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeri, Christian. “Désir mimétique et reconnaissance.” In René Girard. La théorie mimétique. De l’apprentissage à l’apocalypse, edited by Charles Ramond, 15–58. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeri, Christian. Droit, pouvoir, liberté. Spinoza critique de Hobbes [Right, Power, Freedom. Spinoza as Critic of Hobbes]. Paris: PUF, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeri, Christian. “Pascal et Spinoza. Deux modèles de reconnaissance.” In Pascal et Spinoza. Pensée du contraste. De la géométrie du hasard à la nécessité de la liberté, edited by Laurent Bove, Gérard Bras, and Eric Méchoulan, 245–272. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• LeBuffe, Michael. From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Macherey, Pierre. Introduction à l’Éthique de Spinoza. La troisième partie: la vie affective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. “Hobbes and Spinoza.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought. 1450-1700, edited by J. H. Burns, 530–557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, Alexandre. Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, Alexandre. “Le ‘droit du plus fort’. Hobbes contre Spinoza.” In Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique, 131–154. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, Alexandre. “Le problème de l’évolution de Spinoza du Traité Théologico-Politique au Traité Politique.” Études sur Spinoza, 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, Pierre-François. “Pacte social et Histoire.” In Recht zwischen Natur und Geschichte. Le droit entre nature et histoire, edited by François Kervégan, and Heinz Mohnhaupt, 33–44. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, Pierre-François. Spinoza. L’expérience et l’éternité [Spinoza. Experience and eternity]. Paris: PUF, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Morfino, Vittorio. “Transindividuale e/o riconoscimento: ancora sull’alternativa Hegel/Spinoza.” In Strategie della relazione, edited by Nicola Marcucci, and Luca Pinzolo, 179–200. Rome: Meltemi, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Olsthoorn, Johan. “Spinoza on Human and Divine Justice.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 33, no. 1 (2016): 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Michael A. “Two Collective Action Problems in Spinoza’s Social Contract Theory.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15, no. 4 (1998): 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Donald. “Salvation as a State of Mind: The Place of Acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7, no. 3 (1999): 447–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09608789908571039.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Campos, André. Spinoza’s Revolutions in Natural Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Hasana. Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Soyarslan, Sanem. “Spinoza’s Critique of Humility in the Ethics.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 56, no. 3 (2018): 343–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. Œuvres, edited by Pierre-François Moreau. Vol. 1-8. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999- … Vol. 3, Traité théologico-politique, edited by Fokke Akkerman. (1999); Vol. 4, Éthique, edited by Fokke Akkerman and Piet Steenbakkers (2020); Vol. 5, Traité politique, edited by Omero Proietti (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. 1 (Ethics) and 2 (Theological-Political Treatise and Political Treatise). Edited and Translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985 and 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Diane. “Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, edited by Olli Koistinen, 140–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Toto, Francesco. “Esemplarità e imitazione. Gloria e vergogna nell’Etica di Baruch Spinoza.” Rivista di Storia della filosofia 2 (2016): 221–242.
   Google Scholar
• Toto, Francesco. “Hobbes e il riconoscimento. Antropologia, morale e politica.” Consecutio rerum 1 (2016): 12–46.
   Google Scholar
• Toto, Francesco. “L’humilité et la pénitence chez Malebranche et Spinoza. Racines théologiques d’une différence éthique.” In Malebranche-Spinoza. À la croisée des interprétations, edited by Raffaele Carbone, Chantal Jaquet, and Pierre-François Moreau, 111–35. Lyon: ÉNS Éditions, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Toto, Francesco. L’individualità dei corpi. Percorsi nell’Etica di Spinoza [The Individuality of Bodies. Paths in Spinoza’s Ethics]. Milan: Mimesis, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Toto, Francesco, and Francesco Toto. “‘Acquiescentia in se ipso’ y constitución imaginaria del ‘Sí mismo’.” In Spinoza. Noveno Coloquio, edited by Diego Tatián, 131–140. Córdoba: Brujas, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Ericka. “Spinoza, Religion, and Recognition.” In Reflections on Recognition: Contemporary and Historical Studies, edited by Maijastina Kahlos, Heikki J. Koskinen, and Ritva Palmén, 219–231. New York, NY: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Theo. “Spinoza on Natural Rights.” Intellectual History Review 17, no. 3 (2007): 257–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17496970701622499.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich, Cristoph. Anti-spinoza. Amsterdam: apud Johannem Wolters, 1690.
   Google Scholar
• Youpa, Andrew. The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Zourabichvili, François. Le conservatisme paradoxal de Spinoza. Enfance et royauté [Spinoza’s Paradoxical Conservatism. Childhood and Royalty]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2002.
   Google Scholar