1,071
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Remarks on the idealist and empiricist interpretation of frequentism: Robert Leslie Ellis versus John Venn

Bibliography

  • Daston, L, ‘How probabilities came to be subjective and objective’, Historia Mathematica, 21 (1994), 330–344.
  • Ellis, R L, ‘On the foundations of the theory of probabilities’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8 (1844), 1–6.
  • Ellis, R L, ‘Remarks on the fundamental principle of the theory of probabilities’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 9 (1854), 605–607.
  • Galavotti, M, ‘Probability’, in S Psillos and M Curd (eds), The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, Abingdon: Routledge, 2008, 414–424.
  • Galavotti, M, ‘The modern epistemic interpretations of probability: logicism and subjectivism’, in D M Gabbay, S Hartmann and J Woods (eds), Handbook of the history of logic, vol 10: inductive logic, Oxford: Elsevier, 2011, 153–204.
  • Gillies, D, An objective theory of probability, London: Methuen, 1973 [ reprinted Abingdon: Routledge, 2011].
  • Gillies, D, Philosophical theories of probability, London: Routledge, 2000.
  • Hacking, I, ‘Jacques Bernoulli’s Art of conjecturing’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 22 (1971), 209–229.
  • Hald, A, A history of parametric statistical inference from Bernoulli to Fisher, 1713–1935, New York: Springer, 2007.
  • Keynes, J M, A treatise on probability, London: Macmillan and Co., 1921.
  • Kilinc, B, ‘John Venn’s evolutionary logic of chance’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 30 (1999), 559–585.
  • Kilinc, B, ‘Robert Leslie Ellis and John Stuart Mill on the one and the many of frequentism’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8 (2000), 251–274.
  • Lang, B, ‘Intuition in Bloomsbury’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 25 (1964), 295–302.
  • Porter, T M, The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.
  • Schafer, G, ‘Can the various meanings of probability be reconciled?’, in G Keren and C Lewis (eds), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: methodological issues, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, 165–196.
  • Schafer, G, ‘The significance of Jacob Bernoulli’s Ars Conjectandi for the philosophy of probability today’, Journal of Econometrics, 75 (1996), 15–32.
  • Shairp, J C, and Tait P, Guthrie, Life and letters of James David Forbes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873 [ 2010].
  • Venn, J, The logic of chance: an essay on the foundations and province of the theory of probability, with especial reference to its application to moral and social sciences, London: Macmillan and Co., 1866.
  • Venn, J. The logic of chance: an essay on the foundations and province of the theory of probability, with especial reference to its logical bearings and its application to moral and social science, London: Macmillan and Co., 1876.
  • Verburgt, L, ‘Robert Leslie Ellis’s work on philosophy of science and the foundations of probability theory’, Historia Mathematica, 40 (2013), 423–454.
  • Verburgt, L. ‘Anti-subjective, non-objective probabilities? Some complexities of nineteenth-century British revisionist and frequency theories of probability’, (submitted for reviewa).
  • Verburgt, L. ‘John Venn’s hypothetical infinite frequentism: logical, not mathematical’, (submitted for review b).
  • Wall, B E, ‘Causation, randomness, and pseudo-randomness in John Venn’s Logic of chance’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 26 (2005), 299–319.
  • Wall, B E, ‘Book review of S.L. Zabell. ‘Symmetry and its discontents: essays on the history of inductive probability’, Isis, 97 (2006a), 596–597.
  • Wall, B E, ‘John Venn’s opposition to probability as a degree of belief’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 37 (2006b), 550–561.
  • Zabell, S, Symmetry and its discontents: essays on the history of inductive probability, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.