The hybrid Fuzzy Fault and Event Tree analysis in the geotechnical risk management in HDD projects

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers. 2005. HDD Design Guideline Task Committee, Pipeline Design for Installation by Horizontal Directional Drilling, Reston.
   Google Scholar
• Ariaratnam, S., J. Lueke, and E. Anderson. 2004. “Reducing Risks in Unfavourable Ground Conditions During Horizontal Directional Drilling.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 9 (3): 164–169. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:3(164)
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, H. J. 2005. HDD Practice Handbook. Essen: Vulkan Verlag Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D., and S. Ariaratnam. 2008. Horizontal Directional Drilling Good Practice Guidelines. 3rd ed. The North American Society for Trenchless Technology, HDD Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, M. 2018. “How do Swedish Government Agencies Define Risk?” Journal of Risk Research, doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1422782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, C. R. I. 2001. Managing Geotechnical Risk: Improving Productivity in UK Building and Construction. London: The Institution of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K., and R. Hanford. 2012. “Risk Mitigation Strategies for Directional Drilling Projects.” Presented at NASTT NO-DIG 2012, Nashville, March 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gelinas, M., and D. Mathy. 2004. “Designing and Interpreting Geotechnical Investigations for Horizontal Directional Drilling.” In Pipeline Engineering and Construction: What’s on the Horizon?, edited by John J. Galleher, and Michael T. Stift, 1–10. San Diego: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Gierczak, M. 2013. “Analiza ryzyka w technologii horyzontalnych przewiertów sterowanych.” PhD diss., Kielce University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gierczak, M. 2014a. “The Qualitative Risk Assessment of MINI, MIDI and MAXI Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 44: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2014.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierczak, M. 2014b. “The Quantitative Risk Assessment of MINI, MIDI and MAXI Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects Applying Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 43: 67–77. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gransberg, D., and R. Tapia Pereira. 2016. “Alternative Technical Concepts: A Geotechnical Risk Management Tool.” Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance 1 (1): 43–49. doi:10.1080/24705314.2016.1153342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEADS. 2013. Mika, Technical datasheet.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., and B. Ma. 2015. Inside Jet Flow Method for Cuttings Removal in HDD. China Patent, CN 103527092 B.
   Google Scholar
• Krechowicz, M. 2017a. “Effective Risk Management in Innovative Projects: A Case Study of the Construction of Energy Efficient, Sustainable Building of the Laboratory of Intelligent Building in Cracow.” 2017. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering 245 (062007): 1–11. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062006.
   Google Scholar
• Krechowicz, M. 2017b. “Risk Management in Complex Construction Projects That Apply Renewable Energy Sources: A Case Study of the Realization Phase of the Energis Educational and Research Intelligent Building.” 2017. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering 245 (062007): 1–10. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062007.
   Google Scholar
• MI SWACO. 2013. Lost Circulation Materials – Wide range of LCM for HDD Waterwell and Mining applications, Technical datasheet.
   Google Scholar
• Muneeswaran, G., P. Manoharan, P. O. Awoyera, and A. Adesina. 2018. “A Statistical Approach to Assess the Schedule Delays and Risks in Indian Construction Industry.” International Journal of Construction Management, doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1484991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi, M. 2013. Trenchless technology. Planning, Equipment and Methods, Mc Graw Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Naval Facilities Engineering Command. 1986. Soil Mechanics, Design Manual 7, Alexandria Virginia, fig. 4, p. 7.1-3.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, S., P. Headland, and J. McKelvey. 2012. “Paying Small Trenchless Projects Their Dues – a Discussion on Risk Reduction Strategies for Small Trenchless Projects.” Paper presented at NASTT NO-DIG 2012, Nashville, March 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Oreste, P. P., D. Peila, V. Marchionni, and R. Sterling. 2001. “Analysis of the Problems Connected to the Sinking of Micro-TBMs in Difficult Grounds.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Supplement 1, doi:10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00064-0.
   Google Scholar
• Rak, J. 2004. Istota ryzyka w funkcjonowaniu systemu zaopatrzenia w wodę. Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, K., M. Sharifzadeh, and J. K. Hamidi. 2008. “Geotechnical Risk Assessment Based Approach for Rock TBM Selection in Difficult Ground Conditions.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 23 (3): 318–325. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J., T. Merna, and P. Jobling. 2006. Managing Risk in Construction Projects. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spross, J., L. Olsson, and H. Stille. 2018. “The Swedish Geotechnical Society’s Methodology for Risk Management: a Tool for Engineers in Their Everyday Work.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 12 (3): 183–189. doi:10.1080/17499518.2017.1416643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staheli, K., and L. Maday. 2009. “Geotechnical Baseline Reports – Applying the Guidelines to Microtunelling.” Paper presented at NASTT NO-DIG 2009, Toronto, 27 March–3 April.
   Google Scholar
• Strater, N., B. Dorwart, and M. Brownstein. 2006. “Recommended Site and Subsurface Characterization Methods for a Successful Directional Drilling Project.” Paper presented at NASTT NO-DIG 2006, Nashville, March 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Swannell, N., M. Palmer, G. Barla, and M. Barla. 2016. “Geotechchnical Risk Management Approach for TBM Tunnelling in Squeezing Ground Conditions.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 57: 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Subcommitee on Geotechnical Site Investigations. 1984. Geotechnical Site Investigations for Underground Projects – Volume 1: Overview of Practice and Legal Issues, Evaluation of Cases, Conclusions and Recommendations. Washington, DC: US National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, M. 2007. Uncertainty and Ground Conditions. A Risk Management Approach. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, M. 2009. “Extending to Geotechnical Risk Management.” Georisk 3 (3): 174–183. doi:10.1080/17499510902788835.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L., Y. Zhang, and X. Jin. 2012. “Principle and Potential Advantages of Reverse Circulation System for Large Diameter HDD Crossings.” Paper presented at International NO-DIG Berlin 2012, May 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, D. 2005. Horizontal Directional Drilling – Utility and Pipeline Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Woodroffe, N., and S. Ariaratnam. 2008. “Cost and Risk Evaluation for Horizontal Directional Drilling Versus Open Cut in an Urban Environment.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 13 (2): 85–92. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:2(85)
   Google Scholar
• Yan, X., S. T. Ariaratnam, S. Dong, and C. Zeng. 2018. “Horizontal Directional Drilling: State-of-the-art Review of Theory and Applications.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 72: 162–173. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8: 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar