Bayesian learning of Gaussian mixture model for calculating debris flow exceedance probability

References

• Bensmail, H., G. Celeux, A. E. Raftery, and C. P. Robert. 1997. “Inference in Model-Based Cluster Analysis.” Statistics and Computing 7 (1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bouayad, D., J. Baroth, and C. Dano. 2021. “Gaussian mixture model based soil classification using multiple cone penetration tests.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 696 (1): 12–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Z. J., S. Zheng, D. Q. Li, and K. K. Phoon. 2019. “Bayesian Identification of Soil Stratigraphy Based on Soil Behaviour Type Index.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 56 (4): 570–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini, L., S. Cuomo, A. Di Mauro, M. Di Natale, S. Di Nocera, and F. Matano. 2021. “Multidisciplinary Analysis of Combined Flow-Like Mass Movements in a Catchment of Southern Italy.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 15 (1): 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., S. Frühwirth-Schnatter, and C. P. Robert. 2019. “Model Selection for Mixture Models–Perspectives and Strategies.” In Handbook of Mixture Analysis, edited by S. Frühwirth-Schnatter, G. Celeux, and C. P. Robert, 117–154. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Depina, I., T. M. H. Le, G. Eiksund, and P. Strøm. 2016. “Cone Penetration Data Classification with Bayesian Mixture Analysis.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 10 (1): 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidsvig, U. M. K., M. Papathoma-Köhle, J. Du, T. Glade, and B. V. Vangelsten. 2014. “Quantification of Model Uncertainty in Debris Flow Vulnerability Assessment.” Engineering Geology 181: 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2004. “Estimating Marginal Likelihoods for Mixture and Markov Switching Models Using Bridge Sampling Techniques.” The Econometrics Journal 7 (1): 143–167.
   Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., G. Celeux, and C. P. Robert, eds. 2019. Handbook of Mixture Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, Q. F., A. Sarafoglou, D. Matzke, A. Ly, U. Boehm, M. Marsman, and H. Steingroever. 2017. “A Tutorial on Bridge Sampling.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 81: 80–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, Z., and Y. Wang. 2021. “Non-parametric Construction of Site-Specific non-Gaussian Multivariate Joint Probability Distribution from Sparse Measurements.” Structural Safety 91: 102077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., J. P. Wang, D. Q. Li, Z. J. Cao, C. W. Ng, and P. Cui. 2015. “Statistical and Probabilistic Analyses of Impact Pressure and Discharge of Debris Flow from 139 Events During 1961 and 2000 at Jiangjia Ravine, China.” Engineering Geology 187: 122–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Z. C., P. Cui, F. Q. Wei, and S. F. He. 2006. Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences (1961–1984). Beijing, People’s Republic of China: Science Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Z. C., P. Cui, F. Q. Wei, and S. F. He. 2007. Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences (1995–2000). Beijing, People’s Republic of China: Science Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. J., Y. Li, P. C. Su, and Z. L. Cheng. 2008. “Magnitude–Frequency Relations in Debris Flow.” Environmental Geology 55 (6): 1345–1354.
   Google Scholar
• Marchi, L., and V. D’Agostino. 2004. “Estimation of Debris-Flow Magnitude in the Eastern Italian Alps.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29 (2): 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, R. J., and ÁJ Mattos. 2020. “Physically-based Landslide Susceptibility Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation in a Tropical Mountain Basin.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 14 (3): 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., and D. Peel. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Willey.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. L., and W. H. Wong. 1996. “Simulating Ratios of Normalizing Constants via a Simple Identity: A Theoretical Exploration.” Statistica Sinica 6: 831–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostofi, A., R. B. Gilbert, D. R. Montgomery, and J. Wartman. 2019. “Assessing Recurrence Probability for Oso 2014 Landslide in Order to Manage Risk.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 13 (4): 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redner, R. A., and H. F. Walker. 1984. “Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm.” SIAM Review 26 (2): 195–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. 2000. “Dealing with Label Switching in Mixture Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 62 (4): 795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., P. Zeng, T. Li, T. Zhang, X. Feng, and R. Jimenez. 2021. “Run-out Distance Exceedance Probability Evaluation and Hazard Zoning of an Individual Landslide.” Landslides 18 (4): 1295–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Q., and J. Zheng. 2020. “Clone Granular Soils with Mixed Particle Morphological Characteristics by Integrating Spherical Harmonics with Gaussian Mixture Model, Expectation–Maximization, and Dirichlet Process.” Acta Geotechnica 15 (10): 2779–2796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X. S., J. P. Wang, W. Yang, and D. Q. Li. 2018. “Joint Probability Modeling for two Debris-Flow Variables: Copula Approach.” Natural Hazards Review 19 (2): 05018004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, S., J. Kong, and X. Li. 2011. “Forecast Method of Multimode System for Debris Flow Risk Assessment in Qingping Town, Sichuan Province, China.” Journal of Mountain Science 8 (4): 592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, M., D. Q. Li, Z. J. Cao, K. K. Phoon, and Y. Wang. 2016. “Bayesian Identification of Random Field Model Using Indirect Test Data.” Engineering Geology 210: 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Steijn, H. 1996. “Debris-Flow Magnitude—Frequency Relationships for Mountainous Regions of Central and Northwest Europe.” Geomorphology 15 (3-4): 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., H. Wang, R. Y. Liang, H. Zhu, and H. Di. 2018. “A Hidden Markov Random Field Model Based Approach for Probabilistic Site Characterization Using Multiple Cone Penetration Test Data.” Structural Safety 70: 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., X. Wang, J. F. Wellmann, and R. Y. Liang. 2019. “A Bayesian Unsupervised Learning Approach for Identifying Soil Stratification Using Cone Penetration Data.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 56 (8): 1184–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., T. Zhao, and Z. J. Cao. 2015. “Site-specific Probability Distribution of Geotechnical Properties.” Computers and Geotechnics 70: 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., D. D. Yan, and T. Y. Zhao. 2021. “Probabilistic Evaluation of Loess Landslide Impact Using Multivariate Model.” Landslides 18: 1011–1023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01521-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S. 2006. “Advanced Probabilistic Models for Clustering and Projection.” Doctoral dissertation, IMU.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. V. 2010. “Recent Developments of Bayesian Model Class Selection and Applications in Civil Engineering.” Structural Safety 32 (5): 338–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. Y., J. Y. Lei, and L. Xu. 2021. “An Efficient Bayesian Method for Estimating Runout Distance of Region-Specific Landslides Using Sparse Data.” Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2021.1952613.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, M., P. Mani, and H. Romang. 1997. “Magnitude-frequency Aspects of Alpine Debris Flows.” Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 90 (3): 415–420.
   Google Scholar