644
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The affordance of speech recognition technology for EFL learning in an elementary school setting

Pages 79-93 | Received 12 Apr 2012, Accepted 02 Dec 2012, Published online: 14 Jan 2013

References

  • Aist, G. 2002. Helping children learn vocabulary during computer-assisted oral reading. Educational Technology & Society 5, no. 2 (Retrieved August 19, 2010). http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_2/aist.html.
  • Auralog. 1995. Talk to me: User manual, Voisins le Bretonneux, France: Author.
  • Auralog. 2000. AURALANG user manual, Voisins Ie Bretonneux, France: Author.
  • Brunner, C., and R. Menon. 2007. Report to the IBM Corporation: Evaluating reading companion. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center.
  • Campbell, J. 2008. Employing speech-recognition technologies to address the problems of phonetic practice in the EFL classroom. MSc (Technology and Learning) diss., Trinity College, University of Dublin (Retrieved June 22, 2012). http://www.scss.tcd.ie/postgraduate/msctl/current/Dissertations/Campbell%20Joseph.pdf.
  • Celce-Murcia, M., and J. Goodwin. 1991. Teaching pronunciation. In Teaching English as a second language, ed. M. Celce-Murcia, 136–53. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Chen, H.-J. 2001. Evaluating five speech recognition programs for ESL learners. Papers from the ITMELT 2001 Conference (Retrieved October 22). http://elc.polyu.edu.hk/conference/papers2001/chen.htm.
  • Chen, H.-J. 2005. Automatic speech recognition and pronunciation assessment: A preliminary study on the correlations between machine and human scores. TELL Journal 1: 1–23.
  • Chen, H.-J. 2011. Developing and evaluating an oral skills training site supported by automatic speech recognition technology. ReCALL Journal 23, no. 1: 59–78. 10.1017/S0958344010000285
  • Chiu, T.-L., H.-C. Liou, and Y. Yeh. 2007. A study of web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20, no. 3: 209–233. 10.1080/09588220701489374
  • Chu, H.M. 1997. A study on junior high school students' pronunciation skill: Focusing on their command of English spelling-sound correspondences. National Science Council Research Project: NSC86-2411-H-133-002.
  • Dalby, J., and D. Kewley-Port. 1999. Explicit pronunciation training using automatic speech recognition technology. CALICO Journal 16, no. 3: 425–445.
  • Derwing, T.M., M.J. Munro, and M. Carbonaro. 2000. Does popular speech recognition software work with ESL speech? TESOL Quarterly 34: 592–603. 10.2307/3587748
  • DynEd. 1997. New Dynamic English CD-ROM Series, CA, USA.
  • Edusoft. 1998. English Discoveries CD-ROM Series, Hebrew, Israel.
  • Eilers-crandall, K., D. Gustina, and S. Campbell. 2004. Is automatic speech recognition ready for direct use by classroom teachers? PEPNet 2004, Pittsburgh, PA (Retrieved October 22, 2010). http://www.pepnet.org/confpast/2004/pdf/14eilers.doc.
  • Eraut, M. 2000. Non-formal learning, implicit learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. In The necessity of informal learning, ed. F. Coffield, 12–31. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Eskenazi, M. 1999. Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning and Technology 2, no. 2: 62–70 (Retrieved October 20, 2010). http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article3/.
  • Graff, V.P. 1996. Triple Play Plus! English. TESL-EJ 2, no. 2 (Retrieved October 22, 2010). http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej06/mr1.html.
  • Husni, H. and A. Jamaluddin. 2008. A retrospective and future look at speech recognition applications in assisting children with reading disabilities. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2008, WCECS 2008, October 22–24, 2008, San Francisco, USA.
  • Kanellos, M. 2003. Talking computers nearing reality. Cnet News.com. (Retrieved August 29, 2010). http://news.com.com/2104-1008-1023966.html?tag=bigpic.
  • Kartal, G. 2006. Working with an imperfect medium: Speech recognition technology in reading practice. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 15, no. 3: 303–328.
  • Kelly, J. 2004. Why speech now? Speech Technology Magazine 9, no. 2 (Retrieved August 29, 2010). http://www.speechtechmag.com/issues/9_2/.
  • Kenworthy, J. 1987. Teaching English pronunciation. New York: Longman.
  • Kim, I.-S. 2006. Automatic speech recognition: reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation. Educational Technology & Society 9, no. 1: 322–334.
  • Korsah, G.A., J. Mostow, M.B. Dias, T.M. Sweet, S.M. Belousov, M.F. Dias, and H. Gong. 2010. Improving child literacy in Africa: Experiments with an automated Reading Tutor. Information Technologies and International Development 6, no. 2: 1–19.
  • Mackey, A., and J.-Y. Choi. 1998. Review of Tripleplay Plus! English. Language Learning and Technology 12, no. 1: 19–21.
  • Mostow, J., and G. Aist. 1999. Giving help and praise in a reading tutor with imperfect listening – because automated speech recognition means never being able to say you're certain. CALICO Journal 16, no. 3: 407–424.
  • Mostow, J., and G. Aist. 2001. Evaluating tutors that listen: An overview of Project LISTEN. In Smart machines in education, ed. K.D. Forbus and P.J. Feltovich, 169–234. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
  • J. Mostow, Aist, G., P. Burkhead, A. Corbett, A. Cuneo, S. Eitelman, C. Huang, B. Junker, Sklar, M.B., Tobin, B. 2003. Evaluation of an automated reading Tutor that listens: Comparison to human tutoring and classroom instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 29, no. 1: 61–117. 10.2190/06AX-QW99-EQ5G-RDCF
  • J. Mostow, G. Aist, C. Huang, B. Junker, R. Kennedy, H. Lan, D. Latimer et al. 2008. 4-Month evaluation of a learner-controlled Reading Tutor that listens. In The path of speech technologies in computer assisted language learning: From research toward practice, ed. V.M. Holland, and F.P. Fisher, 201–219. New York: Routledge.
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the National Reading Panel (Retrieved October 22, 2010). http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm.
  • Neri, A. C. Cucchiarini, and W. Strik. 2003. Automatic speech recognition for second language learning: How and why it actually works. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 2003 (Retrieved October 22, 2010). http://lands.let.kun.nl/literature/neri.2003.1.pdf.
  • Petrie, G.M. 2003. Speech recognition software: Its possible impact on the language learning classroom. Teaching English with Technology 3, no. 3: 42–49.
  • Rogers, C.L., J.M. Dalby, and G. DeVane. 1994. Intelligibility training for foreign-accented speech: A preliminary study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96, no. 5: Pt. 2, 3348(A). 10.1121/1.410623
  • Teng, H.Y. 2002. Chinese students' performance in the pronunciation of English tense and lax vowels. Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of English Language and Literature, National Taiwan Normal University.
  • Tsai, P.H. 2003. A duet of pedagogy and technology—an evaluation of my ET, a computer assisted pronunciation training system made in Taiwan. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C, 439–52. Taichung: Chaoyang University of Technology.
  • Williams, S.M. 2000. What children learn from using Watch-me!-Read. A report prepared for IBM. http://cct.edc.org/admin/publications/report/ibmsite.pdf (accessed August 29, 2010).
  • Williams, S.M., D. Nix, & P. Fairweather 2000. Using speech recognition technology to enhance literacy instruction for emerging readers. In Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ed. B. Fishman, and S. O'Connor-Divelbiss 115–120. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Witt, S., and S. Young. 1998. Computer-assisted pronunciation teaching based on automatic speech recognition. In Language teaching & language technology, ed. S. Jager, J. Nerbonne, and A. van Essen 25–35. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Zhang, L. 2005. Language differences and communication: Contrastive analysis revisited. WJGR 12, no. 1: 113–31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.