Security sector reform and the challenge of vertical integration

References

• Albrecht, P., and L. Buur. 2009. “An Uneasy Marriage: Non-State Actors and Police Reform.” Policing and Society 19 (4): 390–405. doi: 10.1080/10439460903375182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., and L. Olson. 2003. Confronting War: Critical Lessons for Peace Practitioners. Cambridge, MA: The Collaborative for Development Action.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S. 2009. “Hobbes and the Congo – Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention in the Congo.” International Organization 63 (2): 249–280. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaz Eriksson, M., and M. Stern. 2017. “Being Reformed: Subjectification and Security Sector Reform in the Congolese Armed Forces.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (2): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2017.1337338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B. 2010. “The Future is Non-State.” In The Future of Security Sector Reform, edited by M. Sedra, 208–228. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B., and E. Scheye. 2007. “Multi-layered Justice and Security Delivery in Post-Conflict and Fragile States.” Conflict, Security and Development 7 (4): 503–528. doi: 10.1080/14678800701692944
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, R. 2012. “Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance.” Global Governance 18 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boege, V., A. Brown, K. Clements, and A. Nolan. 2008. On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: State Formation in the Context of ‘Fragility’. Berlin: Berghof Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A., and A. F. Gusmao. 2009. “Peacebuilding and Political Hybridity in East Timor.” Peace Review 21 (1): 61–69. doi: 10.1080/10402650802690086
   Google Scholar
• Burt, G. 2011. “Just say no to a new Haitian Army.” The Globe and Mail, October 10. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/just-say-no-to-a-new-haitian-army/article4183442/
   Google Scholar
• Burt, G. 2013. “Rethinking Haiti’s Armed Forces.” Blog post, Security Sector Reform Resource Centre, August 21. http://www.ssrresourcecentre.org/2013/08/21/rethinking-haitis-armed-forces/.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, J., and T. Hohe. 2004. “Participatory Peacebuilding.” In Building Sustainable Peace, edited by T. Keating, and W. A. Knight, 241–261. Edmonton/Tokyo: University of Alberta Press/United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colletta, N., and R. Muggah. 2009. “Context Matters: Interim Stabilization and Second Generation Approaches to Security Promotion.” Conflict, Security and Development 9 (4): 425–453. doi: 10.1080/14678800903345762
   Google Scholar
• Cubitt, C. 2013. “Responsible Reconstruction After war: Meeting Local Needs for Building Peace.” Review of International Studies 39: 91–112. doi: 10.1017/S0260210512000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denney, L. 2013. “Liberal Chiefs of Illiberal Development? The Challenge of Engaging Chiefs in DFID’s Security Sector Reform Programme in Sierra Leone.” Development Policy Review 31 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2013.00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donais, T., ed. 2008. Local Ownership and Security Sector Reform. Zurich/Berlin: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T. 2013. Towards Vertically Integrated Peace Building: Bridging Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T. 2015. “Ownership: From Policy to Practice.” In Handbook of International Security and Development, edited by P. Jackson, 227–247. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T., and A. Knorr. 2013. “Peacebuilding from Below vs. the Liberal Peace: The Case of Haiti.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 34 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2013.761130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donini, A. 2007. “Local Perceptions of Assistance to Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 14 (1): 158–172. doi: 10.1080/13533310601114376
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. 2014. “Security Sector Reform, Statebuilding and Local Ownership: Securing the State or its People?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. doi:10.1080/17502977.2014.930219.
   Google Scholar
• Graben, S., and A. Fitz-Gerald. 2013. “Mind the Gap: The Importance of Local Institutional Development in Peace-Building-Funded Security Interventions.” Conflict, Security and Development 13 (3): 285–316. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2013.811049
   Google Scholar
• IDPS (International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding). 2011. “A New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States.” November 30. http://www.pbsbdialogue.org/media/filer_public/07/69/07692de0-3557-494e-918e-18df00e9ef73/the_new_deal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. 2011. “Security Sector Reform and State Building.” Third World Quarterly 32 (10): 1803–1822. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2011.610577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. 2012. Towards a Non-State Security Sector Reform Strategy. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, J. P. 2012. “The Origins and Evolution of Infrastructures for Peace: A Personal Reflection.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (3): 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. 2010. “Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-up Peace.” Security Dialogue 41 (4): 391–412. doi: 10.1177/0967010610374312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., and O. Richmond. 2013. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., and P. Wilson. 2008. “Security Sector Evolution: Which Locals? Ownership of What?”.” In Local Ownership and Security Sector Reform, edited by T. Donais, 83–103. Zurich/Berlin: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, K. 2012. “The Strength of Weak States? Non-State Security Forces and Hybrid Governance in Africa.” Development and Change 43 (5): 1073–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaers, N., and R. Robrecht. 2009. “The Trouble with Participation: Assessing the new aid Paradigm.” In Doing Good or Doing Better? Development Policies in a Globalizing World, edited by M. Kremer, P. van Lieshout, and R. Went, 255–278. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muggah, R., T. D. Sisk, E. Piza-Lopez, J. Salmon, and P. Keuleers. 2012. Governance for Peace: Securing the Social Contract. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, V. 2017. “Positive Hybridity? Unpacking UN Security Sector Reform in South Lebanon.” Contemporary Politics 23 (2): 156–174. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2016.1233756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odendaal, A. 2013. A Crucial Link: Local Peace Committees and National Peacebuilding. Washington: US Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Supporting Statebuilding in Situations of Conflict and Fragility: Policy Guidance. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, S. 2012. “A ‘New Deal’ for Fragile States? Promises and Pitfalls.” Council on Foreign Relations, February 1. https://www.cfr.org/blog/new-deal-fragile-states-promises-and-pitfalls.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations. 2014. “Inclusivity in Rebuilding States: Focusing on Inclusivity in Security Sector Reform (SSR).” Draft concept note. April 22. http://www.un.emb-japan.go.jp/events/2014/042214/Draft_Concept_Note_22_April2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pouligny, B. 2005. “Civil Society and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Ambiguities of International Programmes Aimed at Building ‘New’ Societies.” Security Dialogue 36 (4): 495–510. doi: 10.1177/0967010605060448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouligny, B. 2009. “Local Ownership.” In Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon, edited by V. Chetail, 174–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. 2009. “A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirinism and the Everyday.” Review of International Studies 35: 557–580. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricigliano, R. 2003. “Networks of Effective Action: Implementing an Integrated Approach to Peacebuilding.” Security Dialogue 34 (4): 445–462. doi: 10.1177/0967010603344005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, U., and F. Chappuis. 2014. “New Perspectives on Security Sector Reform: The Role of Local Agency and Domestic Politics.” International Peacekeeping 21 (2): 133–148. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.910401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedra, M. 2010. “Towards Second Generation Security Sector Reform.” In The Future of Security Sector Reform, edited by M. Sedra, 102–116. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Titov, D. 2014. “Inclusivity in Rebuilding States: Focusing on Inclusivity in SSR.” Speech given at Seminar on Inclusivity in Rebuilding States: Focusing on Inclusivity in Security Sector Reform, New York, 22 April 2014. http://www.un.emb-japan.go.jp/events/2014/042214/ASG_Dmitry_Titov_22_April2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2008. “Securing Peace and Development: The Role of the United Nations in Supporting Security Sector Reform.” A/62/659_S/2008/39, 23 January.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2010. “Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture.” A/64/868-S/2010/393, 21 July.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2013. “Security States and Societies: Strengthening the United Nations Comprehensive Support to Security Sector Reform.” A/67/970-S/2013/480, 13 August.
   Google Scholar
• Wilén, N. 2009. “Capacity-building or Capacity-Taking? Legitimizing Concepts in Peace and Development Operations.” International Peacekeeping 16 (3): 337–351. doi: 10.1080/13533310903036392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar