A Revenge of the Generals. The Rebalancing of the Civil-military Relations in France

References

• Albert, Mathias, and Barry Buzan. 2010. “Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (3): 315–337. doi: 10.1177/1354066109350064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosetti, David, Yves Buchet de Neuilly, and Sandrine Lefranc. 2015. “Sociologie des crises politiques et analyse des relations internationales.” In La logique du désordre. Relire la sociologie de Michel Dobry, edited by Aït-Aoudia Myriam and Roger Antoine, 197–260. Paris: Presses de Science Po.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John. 1962. How to do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autessere, Séverine. 2015. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batiste, John. 2006. “A case for accountability.” Washington Post, April 19.
   Google Scholar
• Bennani-Chraïbi, Mounia, and Fillieule, Olivier. 2012. “Retour sur les situations révolutionnaires arabes.” Revue française de science politique 62: 767–796. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.625.767
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2005. “La mondialisation de l‘(in)sécurité? Réflexions sur le champ des professionnels de la gestion des inquiétudes et analytique de la transnationalisation des processus d‘(in)sécurisation.” Cultures & Conflits 2 (58): 53–101. doi: 10.4000/conflits.1813
   Google Scholar
• Bonditti, Philippe. 2015. “Les concepts, parent pauvre des études (critiques) de sécuritéProposition pour une archéologie des savoirs de la sécurité.” Études Internationales 46 (2-3): 167–188. doi: 10.7202/1035176ar
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Ken. 1991. “Security and Emancipation.” Review of International Studies 17 (4): 313–326. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112033
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Réponses. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Chistoper, and Macdonald Matt. 2013. “The Future of Critical Security Studies: Ethics and the Politics of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 235–255. doi: 10.1177/1354066111419538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchet de Neuilly, Yves. 2019. “Presence on the Ground: Expectations, Resources and Tactical Moves in the Negotiation of a UN Peacekeeping Operation in the Central African Republic.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13 (3): 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1623752
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, States and Fear – An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Hervester.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2007. “The Security–Development Nexus and the Rise of ‘Anti-Foreign Policy.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 362–386. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David, and Nik Hynek. 2011. “No Emancipatory Alternative, no Critical Security Studies.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (1): 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chantebout, Bernard. 1986. “La dissuasion nucléaire et le pouvoir présidentiel.” Pouvoirs 38: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Samy. 1994. La Défaite des généraux. Le pouvoir politique et l‘armée sous la Ve République. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Daho, Grégory. 2011. “Les interfaces militaro-industrielles et la prospection des marchés de la reconstruction en ex-Yougoslavie. Un laboratoire pour l‘intelligence économique nationale ?” Les Champs de Mars 2 (22): 133–153. doi: 10.3917/lcdm1.022.0133
   Google Scholar
• Daho, Grégory. 2014. “L‘érosion des tabous algériens. Une autre explication de la transformation des organisations militaires en France.” Revue Française de Science Politique 64: 57–78. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.641.0057
   Google Scholar
• Daho, Grégory. 2016. La transformation des armées. Enquête sur les relations civilo-militaires en France. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l‘Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvin, Pascal, and Johanna Siméant. 2002. Le travail humanitaire. Les acteurs des ONG du siège au terrain. Paris: Presses de Science-Po.
   Google Scholar
• Desch, Michael. 1999. Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant Garth. 2002. La Mondialisation des guerres de palais. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, Michel. 1986. “Le jeu du consensus.” Pouvoirs 38: 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Duclos, Nathalie and Cécile Jouhanneau. 2019. “To Serve and Survey: French Gendarmes as International Police in Peacebuilding Missions in Bosnia and Kosovo.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13 (3): 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1623755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. 2007. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, Paul. 2006. “For his failures, Rumsfled must go.” The New York Times, March 19.
   Google Scholar
• Egnell, Robert. 2006. “Explaining U.S. and British Performance in Complex Expeditionary Operations: The Civil-Military Dimension.” Journal of Strategic Studies 29 (6): 1041–1075. doi: 10.1080/01402390601016717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter. 2003. nor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter. 2011. “The Right to Be Right: Civil-Military Relations and the Iraq Surge Decision.” Quarterly Journal : International Security 35: 87–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, Samuel. 1988. The Man on Horseback. The Role of the Military in Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galula, David. 2006. Pacification in Algeria, 1956–1958. Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Goetze, Catherine. 2017. The Distinction of Peace. A Social Analysis of Peacebuilding. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guibert, Nathalie. 2010. “On ne peut pas faire la guerre contre le moral des soldats.” Le Monde 2, juillet: 8.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, Morton, and Arnold Kanter. 1973. Readings in American Foreign Policy: A Bureaucratic Perpective. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Hamelin, Fabrice. 2003. “Le combattant et le technocrate. La formation des officiers à l‘aune du modèle des élites civiles.” Revue Française de Science Politique 53: 435–436. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.533.0435
   Google Scholar
• Hué, Bernard. 2007. “Les apports des actions de cooperation civilo-militaire (CCM) en stabilization.” Doctrine 12: 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irondelle, Bastien. 2003. Gouverner la défense : analyse du processus décisionnel de la réforme militaire, Thèse de doctorat en science politique, Paris, Sciences Po, 16 décembre.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, Morris. 1960. The Professional Soldier: a Social and Political Portrait. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter. 1976. “International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States.” International Organizations 30 (1): 1–45. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300003726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert, and Nye, Joseph. 1977. Power and Interdependance: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnen, Alexandre. 2007. “ALAT et stabilisation, le cas de l‘Algérie.” Cahier de la recherché doctrinale, Paris Ministère de la Défense.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Richard. 2002. “Erosion of Civilian Control of the Military in the United States Today.” Naval War College Review 55 (3): 8–59.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36 (2): 185–205. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasconjarias, Guillaume. 2005. “Les “sections administratives spécialisées en Algérie”: un outil pour la stabilisation”, Cahier de la recherché doctrinale, Paris, Ministère de la Défense.
   Google Scholar
• Le Guen, Adèle. 2006. “L‘emploi des forces terrestres dans les missions de stabilisation en Algérie”, Cahier de la recherché doctrinale, Paris, Ministère de la Défense.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinot-Leroy, Rémy. 2006. “Guerre à l‘école et école de Guerre : la désobéissance doctrinale des officiers français de l‘armée de terre face au ‘fait atomique‘ à travers les écrits des officiers brevetés de l‘école supérieur de guerre (1970-1977).” Cahiers du CEHD 26: 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Merchet, jean-Dominique. 2013. “Cette extrême-droite qui fantasme sur un coup d‘Etat militaire”, Secret Défense, liberation.fr., 5 juin.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Adam. 2019. “Localizing Peacebuilding: The Arizona Market and the Evolution of US Military Peacebuilding Priorities in Bosnia.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13 (3): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1610991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, Charles. 1987. “La banalisation de l‘institution militaire. L‘armée américaine: du modèle institutionnel au modèle industriel.” Futuribles 111: 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, John. 1989. Retreat From Doomsday. The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold, Greg. 2006. “Why Iraq was a mistake.” Times Magazine, April 9.
   Google Scholar
• Newsinger, John. 2002. British Counterinsurgency. From Palestine to Nothern Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, Christian. 2007. “Guerre totale et/ou force minimaleHistoire et paradoxes des “cœurs et des esprits.” Cultures & Conflits 67: 35–62. doi: 10.4000/conflits.3102
   Google Scholar
• Owens, Thomas. 2011. US Civil-Military Relations After 9/11. Renegotiating the Civil-Military Bargain. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Petraeus, David. 2006. “Learning Counter-Insurgency: Observations from Soldiering in Irak.” Military Review 86: 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pichelin, Quentin. 2007. “Vaincre une guérilla. Le cas français en Algérie.” Cahier de la recherché doctrinale, Paris, Ministère de la Défense.
   Google Scholar
• Pouponneau, Florent, and Frédéric Mérand. 2017. “Diplomatic Practices, Domestic Fields, and the International System : Explaining France‘s Shift on Nuclear Non-Proliferation.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (1): 123–135. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqw046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report of the High Committee for the Evaluation of the Military Condition. 2015. Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the High Committee for the Evaluation of the Military Condition. 2017. Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Rigouste, Mathieu. 2007. “L‘ennemi intérieur, de la guerre coloniale au contrôle sécuritaire.” Cultures & Conflits 67: 157–174. doi: 10.4000/conflits.3128
   Google Scholar
• Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies.” World Politics 43 (3): 479–512. doi: 10.2307/2010534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossigneux, Brigitte. 2013. “La gay guerre de nos armées”, Le Canard Enchaîné, 22 mai.
   Google Scholar
• SURCOUF. 2008. “Livre blanc sur la défense: une espérance déçue.” Le Figaro, June 19.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the States: the Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, Elie. 2009. “De l‘IRA à l‘IRAK. Transferts d‘expérience contre-insurrectionnelle dans l‘armée britannique.” Les Champs de Mars 20: 131–153. doi: 10.3917/lcdm1.020.0131
   Google Scholar
• Thièblemont, André. 2005. “Approche critique de la notion de culture militaire.” In Sociologie du milieu militaire. Les conséquences de la professionnalisation sur les armées et l‘identité militaire, edited by Gresle François, 15–26. Paris: L‘Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Trinquier, Roger. 2006. A French View of Counterinsurgency. Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Valeyre, Bertrand. 2010. “Gagner les cœurs et les esprits - Origine historique du concept - Application actuelle en Afghanistan.” Paris, Ministère de la Défense.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole. 1993. “Societal Security: The Concept.” In Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, edited by O. Weaver et al, 17–40. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542. doi: 10.1177/135406610394001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyn Jones, Richard. 1999. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar