Rethinking the legal translation classroom: a course for legal translation professionals

References

• Alcaraz Varó, E., and B. Hughes. 2002. Legal Translation Explained. Translation practices explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, M. 2012. “Not Your Father’s Bureau: Who are We and Where We are Going?” The ATA Chronicle 41: 16–19. January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Angelone, E. 2010. “Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management, and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by M. S. Gregory and E. Angelone, 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Borja Albi, A. 2007. Estrategias, materiales y recursos para la traducción jurídica. Madrid: Edelsa.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, J., and I. Jesionowski. 2010. “Trends in Court Interpreter Training.” MultiLingual June 21 (4): 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., and K. K. Sin. 2008. “Terminological Equivalence in Legal Translation: A Semiotic Approach.” Semiotica 172: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavijo Olmos, B. 2011. “Algunos apartes de la traducción jurídica y oficial en Colombia.” [Some Thoughts about Legal and Official Translation in Colombia.] Revista de la Escuela de Administración de Negocios (EAN) 70: 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Language Access in the Courts. 2011. Guide to Translation of Legal Materials. Williamsburg, VA: The National Center for State Courts. Accessed March 25, 2014. http://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/accessfair/id/232
   Google Scholar
• Dimeny, E., and J. C. Elliott. 2013. “Linguistic and Cultural Competency in the Courtroom.” In Paper presented at NAJIT Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 19 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, E. S. 2011. “Project as a Learning Environment: Scaffolding Team Learning in Translation Projects’.” In Translation and Localization Project Management, edited by K. J. Dunne and E. S. Dunne, 265–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “European Master’s EMT. EMT Conferences.” Brussels: European Commission, DG Translation, Accessed March 25, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/translation/programmes/emt/conferences/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gómez González-Jover, A. 2011. “Course Design and Lesson Planning in Legal Translation Training.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 19 (3): 253–273. doi:10.1080/0907676x.2011.592201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Davies, M. 2004. Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom. Activities, Tasks and Projects. Benjamins Translation Library. Amsterdam, Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gouadec, D. 2007. Translation as a Profession. Benjamins Translation Library Vol. 73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hernon, P., and R. E. Dugan. 2004. Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education: Views and Perspectives. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. H. 2007. “Competence-based Curriculum Design for Training Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1 (2): 163–195. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. 2001. Traducción y traductología. Madrid: Cátedra.
   Google Scholar
• Katschinka, L. 2003. “On Language, Language Skills and Structures that Should Be Utilized in Legal Interpreting and Translation.” In Aequalitas Equal Access to Justice across Language and Culture in the EU Grotius Project 2001/GRP/015, edited by E. Hertog, 59–68. Belgium: Lessius Hogeschool.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. 2002. “Un modelo de competencia traductora: bases para el diseño curricular.” Puentes. Hacia nuevas investigaciones en la mediación intercultural 1: 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. 2005. A Handbook for Translator Trainers, Translation Practices Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Kiraly, D. 2005. “Project-Based Learning: A Case for Situated Translation.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 50 (4): 1098–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2013. “Teaching Business Translation.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 7: 1–26. doi:10.1080/13556509.2013.10798841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert, R. 1932. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes.” Archives of Psychology 140: 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Marco, J., and H. van Lawick. 2009. “Using Corpora and Retrieval Software as a Source of Materials for the Translation Classroom.” In Corpus Use and Translating, edited by A. Beeby, P. R. Inés, and P. Sánchez-Gijón, 9–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, L., and A. H. Albir. 2002. “Translation Techniques Revisited: A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach.” Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs 47 (4): 498–512. http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2002/v47/n4/008033ar.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monzó Nebot, E. M. 2008. “Corpus-based Activities in Legal Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (2): 221–252. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2008.10798775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAJIT (National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators). n.d. “What does a legal translator do?” Washington. Accessed March 25, 2014. http://www.najit.org/certification/faq.php - legaldif
   Google Scholar
• Nord, C. 1991. Text Analysis in Translation. Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco Jutorán, M., and P. Sánchez-Gijón. 2011. “New Resources for Legal Translators.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 19: 25–44. doi:10.1080/09076761003784979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pym, A., F. Grin, C. Sfreddo, and A. L. J. Chan. 2013. The Status of the Translation Profession in the European Union. New York: Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Reiß, K., and H. J. Vermeer. 1984. Grundlegung Einer Allgemeinen Translationstheorie. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, W. P. 2011. “The Language Enterprise in the US: The Public and Private Sectors.” In Paper presented at The American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese (AATSP), Conrad San Juan Condado Plaza Hotel, San Juan, October 1, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Castro, M. 2013. “The Project Manager and Virtual Translation Teams: Critical Factors.” Translation Spaces A Multidisciplinary, Multimedia, and Multilingual Journal of Translation 2 (1): 37–62. doi:10.1075/ts.
   Google Scholar
• Shreve, G. M. 2002. “Knowing Translation: Cognitive and Experiential Aspects of Translation Expertise from the Perspective of Expertise Studies.” In Translation Studies: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, edited by A. Riccardi, 150–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R., K. Reid, D. Kok, and M. Collins. 2012. “Teaching a Fishbowl Tutorial: Sink or Swim?” The Clinical Teacher 9 (2): 80–84. doi:10.1111/tct.2012.9.issue-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Economist. 2012. “Translating and the Law.” In The Economist, Vol. 66. New York: The Economist Group
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Group. 2013. Learning Outcomes. Washington: The World Bank Group. Accessed March 25, 2014. http://go.worldbank.org/GOBJ17VV90
   Google Scholar
• Ulicna, D. 2011. Order 144 –Study on the Use of Credit Systems in Higher Education’, GHK in Cooperation with Technopolis. Contribution from the US Made by Penn State University. Brussels: GHK consulting. http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/study/2011/us_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Washbourne, K. 2009. Manual of Spanish-English Translation. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Washbourne, K. 2012. “Translation Style Guides in Translator Training: Considerations for Task Design.” JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 17: 2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Way, C. 2012. “A Discourse Analysis Approach to Legal Translator Training: More than words.” International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 2 (4): 39–61.
   Google Scholar