Are interpreters better respeakers?

References

• Arumí Ribas, M., and P. Romero Fresco. 2008. “A Practical Proposal for the Training of Respeakers.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 10: 106–127.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., and G. Hitch. 1974. “Working Memory.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, edited by G. H. Bower, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, G., J.-F. Beaumont, M. Boisvert, J. Brousseau, P. Cardinal, C. Chapdelaine, M. Comeau, P. Ouellet, F. Osterrath, and P. Dumuchel. 2009. “Shadow Speaking for Real-Time Closed-Captioning of TV Broadcasts in French.” In Listening to Subtitles. Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, edited by A. Matamala and P. Orero, 191–208. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler, H. 1986. “Linguistic (Semantic) and Extra-Linguistic (Pragmatic) Criteria for the Evaluation of Conference Interpretation and Interpreters.” Multilingua 5 (4): 231–235.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., M. J. Kane, M. F. Bunting, D. Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm, and R. W. Engle. 2005. “Working Memory Span Tasks: A Methodological Review and User’s Guide.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12: 769–786. doi:10.3758/BF03196772.
   Google Scholar
• De Korte, T. 2006. “Live Inter-Lingual Subtitling in the Netherlands. Historical Background and Current Practice.” Intralinea. http://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/Live_inter-lingual_subtitling_in_the_Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Den Boer, C. 2001. “Live Interlingual Subtitling.” In (Multi)Media Translation: Concepts, Practices and Research, edited by Y. Gambier and H. Gottlieb, 167–172. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and N. Charness. 1994. “Expert Performance. Its Structure and Acquisition.” American Psychologist 49 (8): 725–747. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725.
   Google Scholar
• Eugeni, C. 2008. “A Sociolinguistic Approach to Real-Time Subtitling: Respeaking Vs. Shadowing and Simultaneous Interpreting.” English in International Deaf Communication 72: 357–382.
   Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 2009. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A., 2015. “The Acquisition of Translation Competence. Competences, Tasks, and Assessment in Translator Training.” Meta: Translators’ Journal 60: 256-280.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2002. Conference Interpreting Explained, 2nd ed. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., P. Ayres, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2003. “The Expertise Reversal Effect.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 1999. “Managing Split Attention and Redundancy in Multimedia Instruction.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 13: 351–371. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., L. Kesterand, and G. Corbalan. 2011. “Cognitive Load Theory and Multimedia Learning, Task Characteristics, and Learner Engagement: The Current State of the Art.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lambourne, A. 2006. “Subtitle Respeaking. A New Skill for A New Age.” Intralinea. http://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/Subtitle_respeaking
   Google Scholar
• Luyckx, B., T. Delbeke, L. Van Waes, M. Leijten, and A. Remael 2010. “Live Subtitling with Speech Recognition. Causes and Consequences of Text Reduction.” IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, A. 2004. “Simultaneous Interpreting and Respeaking: A Comparison.” MA thesis., University of Westminster.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, A. 2006. “Respeaking for the BBC.” Intralinea http://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/Respeaking_for_the_BBC
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Pérez, J., and O. Lopes. 2013. “Tool for Assessing Accuracy Rate of Live Subtitles.” Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Live Subtitling, Barcelona, March.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Pérez, J. 2015. “New Approaches to Improve the Quality of Live Subtitling on TV.” Paper presented at the Respeaking, Live Subtitling and Accessibility Conference, Rome, June 12.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2014. Measuring live subtitling quality. Results from the first sampling exercise. London. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/41114/qos_4th_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2015. Measuring Live Subtitling Quality. Results from the Fourth Sampling Exercise.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., A. Renkl, and J. Sweller. 2003. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2004. Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Remael, A., and B. Van Der Veer 2006. “Real-Time Subtitling in Flanders: Needs and Teaching.” Intralinea, Special Issue: Respeaking, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, I., and A. Remael. 2017. “Assessing Quality in Live Interlingual Subtitling: A New Challenge.” Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 14: 168–195.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Fresco, P. 2009. “Quality in Respeaking: The Reception of Respoken Subtitles.” Paper presented at the Media for All 3 conference, Antwerp, October 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P. 2011. Subtitling through Speech Recognition: Respeaking. Manchester: St Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P. 2012. “Respeaking in Translator Training Curricula. Present and Future Prospects.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 6 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1080/13556509.2012.10798831.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P. 2013. “Quality and NER in the UK.” Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Live Subtitling, Barcelona, March.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P. 2016. “Accessing Communication: The Quality of Live Subtitles in the UK.” Language & Communication 49: 56–69. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2016.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P., and F. Pöchhacker. 2017. “Quality Assessment in Interlingual Live Subtitling: The NTR Model.” Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 14: 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Fresco, P., and J. Martínez Pérez. 2015. “Accuracy Rate in Live Subtitling: The NER Model.” In Audiovisual Translation in a Global Context. Mapping an Ever-Changing Landscape, edited by J. Díaz Cintas and R. Baños Pinero, 28–50. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sandrelli, A. 2013. “Reduction Strategies and Accuracy Rate in Live Subtitling of Weather Forecasts: A Case Study.” Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Live Subtitling, Barcelona, March.
   Google Scholar
• Shlesinger, M. 2000. “Strategic allocation of working memory and other attentional resources in simultaneous interpreting.” PhD diss., Bar Ilan University.
   Google Scholar
• Szarkowska, A., K. Krejtz, Ł. Dutka, and O. Pilipczuk. 2016. “Cognitive Load in Intralingual and Interlingual Respeaking – A Preliminary Study.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52 (2): 209–233. doi:10.1515/psicl-2016-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Timarová, Š., I. Čeňková, and R. Meylaerts. 2015. “Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory Capacity.” In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting, edited by A. Ferreira and J. W. Schwieter, 101–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar