Interpreter performance in police interviews. Differences between trained interpreters and untrained bilinguals

References

• Berk-Seligson, S. [1990] 2002. The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. 2000. “Interpreting for the Police: Issues in Pre-Trial Phases of the Judicial Process.” International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 7 (2): 212–237. doi:10.1558/sll.2000.7.2.212.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. 2002. “The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English-speaking Murder Suspect.” In Language in the Legal Process, edited by J. Cotterill, 127–146. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. 2009. Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. Vol. 25. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge, J. 1999. “Information Loss in Bilingual Medical Interviews through an Untrained Interpreters.” The Translator 5 (2): 201–219. doi:10.1080/13556509.1999.10799041.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, A. 2001. “Discourse Theory and Performance-Based Assessment: Two Tools for Professional Interpreting.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 46 (2): 365–378. doi:10.7202/002345ar.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Attorney General’s Department (CAGD). 1991. Access to Interpreters in the Australian Legal System. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., J. Goodman-Delahunty, and S. Desai. 2017. “Development of an Information Sheet Providing Rapport Advice for Interpreters in Police Interviews.” Police Practice and Research 18 (3): 291–305. doi:10.1080/15614263.2017.1291580.
   Google Scholar
• Ewens, S., A. Vrij, S. Leal, S. Mann, E. Jo, A. Shaboltas, M. Ivanova, J. Granskaya, and K. Houston. 2016. “Using the Model Statement to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit from Native Speakers, Non‐Native Speakers and Those Talking through an Interpreter.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 30 (6): 854–862. doi:10.1002/acp.3270.
   Google Scholar
• Ewens, S., A. Vrij, S. Leal, S. Mann, E. Jo, and R. P. Fisher. 2014. “The Effect of Interpreters on Eliciting Information, Cues to Deceit and Rapport.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 1–19. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12067.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, G., M. B. Laws, S. J. Mayo, B. Zuckerman, M. Abreu, L. Medina, and E. J. Hardt. 2003. “Errors in Medical Interpretation and Their Potential Clinical Consequences in Pediatric Encounters.” Pediatrics 111 (1): 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., and L. M. Howes. 2017. “High-Stakes Interviews and Rapport Development: Practitioners’ Perceptions of Interpreter Impact.” Policing and Society 1–18. doi:10.1080/10439463.2017.1293051.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., and N. Martschuk. 2016. “Risks and Benefits of Interpreter-Mediated Police Interviews 1.” Journal of Criminal Justice and Security 18 (4): 451–471.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman‐Delahunty, J., N. Martschuk, and M. K. Dhami. 2014. “Interviewing High Value Detainees: Securing Cooperation and Disclosures.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 28 (6): 883–897. doi:10.1002/acp.3087.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. [2004] 2010. The Discourse of Court Interpreting. Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. 2007a. “The Challenges of Court Interpreting: Intricacies, Responsibilities and Ramifications.” Alternative Law Journal 32 (4): 198–202. doi:10.1177/1037969X0703200402.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. 2007b. Community Interpreting. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. 2011. “The Need to Raise the Bar: Court Interpreters as Specialised Experts.” The Judicial Review 10: 237–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S., and E. Gonzalez. 2017. “Teaching Legal Interpreting at University Level: A Research-Based Approach.” In Teaching Dialogue Interpreting. Research-Based Proposals for Higher Education, edited by L. Cirillo and N. Niemants, 199–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S., J. Goodman‐Delahunty, and N. Martschuk. Forthcoming. “Interactional Management in a Simulated Police Interview: Interpreters’ Strategies.” In The Discourse of Police Investigation, edited by M. Mason and F. Rock. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. Forthcoming. “Specialist Legal Interpreters for a Fairer Justice System.” In Discourse in Translation, edited by S. Faiq, 47–66. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S., I. Garcia, J. Hlavac, M. Kim, M. Lai, B. Turner, and H. Slatyer. 2012. Improvements to NAATI Testing: Development of a Conceptual Overview for a New Model for NAATI Standards, Testing and Assessment. Sydney: The University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Hlavac, J. 2013. “A Cross-National Overview of Translator and Interpreter Certification Procedures.” Translation & Interpreting 5 (1): 32–65.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, L. M. 2018. “Community Interpreters’ Experiences of Police Investigative Interviews: How Might Interpreters’ Insights Contribute to Enhanced Procedural Justice?” Policing and Society 1–19. doi:10.1080/10439463.2018.1447572.
   Google Scholar
• ImPLI Project. 2012. Improving Police and Legal Interpreting: Final Report. Paris: Institut de Management et de Communication Interculturels.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., and J. Zetzsche. 2012. Found in Translation: How Language Shapes Our Lives and Transforms the World. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Krikke, A., and M. Besiktaslian. 2004. “Effective Use of Interpreters.” In Instruments for Lifting Language Barriers in Intercultural Legal Proceedings, Aequilibrium, EU Project, edited by W. J. Gasille and H. Keijzer-Lambooy, 155–171. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ITV Hogeschool voor Tolken en Vertalen.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M., and S. Mulayim. 2014. “Interpreter Linguistic Intervention in the Strategies Employed by Police in Investigative Interviews.” Police Practice and Research 15 (4): 307–321. doi:10.1080/15614263.2013.809929.
   Google Scholar
• Laster, K., and V. Taylor. 1994. Interpreters and the Legal System. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2008. “Rating Scales for Interpreting Performance Assessment.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (2): 165–184. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2008.10798772.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2017. “A Case Study of Interpreter-Mediated Witness Statement: Police Interpreting in South Korea.” Police Practice and Research 18 (2): 194–205. doi:10.1080/15614263.2016.1248840.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and S. Hale. 2018. “Achieving Accuracy in a Bilingual Courtroom: The Effectiveness of Specialised Legal Interpreter Training.” The Interpreter & Translator Trainer 12 (3): 299–321. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2018.1501649.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Gómez, A. 2015. “Non-Professional Interpreters.” In The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, edited by H. Mikkelson and R. Jourdenais, 429–443. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., C. E. Kelly, and S. A. Woestehoff. 2015. “Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11: 211–233. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelson, H. 2013. “Universities and Interpreter Certification.” Translation & Interpreting 5 (1): 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, B. 2011. The Criminal Trial: Courtroom Practices, Policies and Procedures. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. 1993. “The Interlingual Interpreter - Cypher or Intelligent Participant?” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale De Semiotique Juridique 6 (18): 271–291. doi:10.1007/BF01099836.
   Google Scholar
• Mulayim, S., and M. Lai. 2017. Ethics for Police Translators and Interpreters. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulayim, S., M. Lai, and C. Norma. 2015. Police Investigative Interviews and Interpreting: Context, Challenges, and Strategies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAATI. 2017. “National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters.” https://www.naati.com.au/
   Google Scholar
• Nakane, I. 2014. Interpreter-Mediated Police Interviews: A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr, W. M. 1982. Linguistic Evidence. Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega Herráez, J. M. 2011. Interpretar para la justicia. Granada: Editorial Comares.
   Google Scholar
• Pochhacker, F. 2001. “Quality Assessment in Conference and Community Interpreting.” Meta 46 (2): 410–425. doi:10.7202/003847ar.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2004. Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Smith, L. 2009. “Forensic Interpreting - Trial and Error.” In Critical Link 5. Quality in Interpreting: A Shared Responsibility, edited by S. Hale, U. Ozolins, and L. Stern, 13–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins P/C.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. L. 2002. Interpreting in Legal Contexts: Consecutive and Simultaneous Interpretation. Burtonsville, MD: Sign Media.
   Google Scholar
• Schweda-Nicholson, N. 1989. “Ad Hoc Court Interpreters in the United States: Equality, Inequality, Quality?” Meta: Journal Des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 34 (4): 711–723. doi:10.7202/004074ar.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, L. 2011. “Courtroom Interpreting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by K. Malmkjær and K. Windle, 325–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tebble, H. 2012. “Interpreting or Interfering?.” In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, edited by C. Baraldi and L. Gavioli, 23–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, W., J. A. Burn, and I. H. M. Crezee. 2018. “I’m Asking You Again! Chinese Student Interpreters’ Performance When Interpreting Declaratives with Tag Questions in the Legal Interpreting Classroom.” Perspectives 26 (5): 745–766. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2018.1444071.
   Google Scholar
• Wadensjö, C. [1998] 2014. Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar