Policy scientificity 3.0: theory and policy analysis in-and-for this world and other-worlds

References

• Ahluwalia, P. (2005). Out of Africa: Post-structuralism's colonial roots. Postcolonial Studies, 8(2), 137–154. doi:10.1080/13688790500153554
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2008). Non-representational theory. In R. Johnston, & G. Pratt (Eds.), Dictionary of human geography. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2006). Fear of small numbers: An essay on the geography of anger. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in education studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M., & Marshall, C. (1997). Policy analysis for postsecondary education: Feminist and critical perspectives. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from post-secondary education (pp. 1–20). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bignall, S., & Patton, P. (2010). Introduction: Deleuze and the postcolonial: Conversations, negotiations, mediations. In S. Bignall, & P. Patton (Eds.), Deleuze and the postcolonial (pp. 1–19). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, M., & Proveti, J. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2010). Political theory is not a luxury: A response to timothy Kaufman-Osborn’s ‘political theory as A profession’. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 680–685. doi:10.1177/1065912910369843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski, C. (1984). War all the time. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Deleon, P. (2005). Social construction for public policy. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 635–637. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2007). Two regimes of madness: Text and interviews 1975–1995. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1953). The political system. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on ‘scientifically based’ education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31–38. doi:10.3102/0013189X032007031
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 61(6), 709–726. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00429.x
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1974). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume 1. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393. doi:10.1080/02680930110071002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. (2000). Against race: Imagining political culture beyond the color line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. R. (2005). Neoliberal multiculturalism: The remaking of cultural rights and racial dominance in Central America. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 28(1), 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1990). The emergence of cultural studies and the crisis of the humanities. October, 53, 11–23. doi:10.2307/778912
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heimans, S. (2012). Coming to matter in practice: Enacting education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(2), 313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, E., & White, C. S. (2002). Theme issue on scientific research in education. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14. doi:10.1007/BF00145189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2004a). Foucauldian ‘indiscipline’ as a sort of application: Qu(e)er(y)ing research/policy/practice. In B. M. Baker, & K. E. Heyning (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations: The uses of Foucault in the study of education (pp. 279–304). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2004b). Scientific research in education: A critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 759–772. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 783–791. doi:10.1080/09518390600976006
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2009). 2007 Kneller lecture, AESA getting lost: Social science and/ as philosophy. Educational Studies, 45(4), 342–357. doi:10.1080/00131940903066248
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, D., & Laswell, H. D. (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2006). Globalisation, the research imagination and deparochialising the study of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 287–302. doi:10.1080/14767720600752734
   Google Scholar
• May, T. (2005). The political philosophy of poststructural anarchism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (1987). Studying education through the lives of policy-makers: An attempt to close the micro-macro gap. In L. Barton, & S. Walker (Eds.), Changing policies, changing teachers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckimgham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Humes, W. (2003). Editorial: The reception of post-structuralism in educational research and policy. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 109–113. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (2006). A guide for the perplexed: Scientific educational research, methodolatry, and the gold versus platinum standards. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Prunty, J. J. (1985). Signposts for a critical educational policy analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 29(2), 133–140. doi:10.1177/000494418502900205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2003). Introduction the essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (pp. vii–xxxv). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunig, G. (2007). Art and revolution: Transversal activism in the long twentieth century (A. Dereig, Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing educational policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberston, S. L., & Dale, R. (2008). Researching education in a globalising era: Beyond methodological nationalism. methodological statism, methodological educationism and spatial fetishism. In J. Resnik (Ed.), The production of educational knowledge in the global era. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurich, J. (1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 297–316. doi:10.1080/0268093940090402
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (Eds.). (1997). Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2009a). Re-reading education policies: Part 1: The critical policy orientation. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 1–35). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2009b). Re-reading education policies: Part 2: Challenges, horizons, approaches, tools, styles. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 36–95). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson, & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.834617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Troyna, B. (1994). Critical social research and education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(1), 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. (2007). Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3), 285–298. doi:10.1080/00131910701427231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(3), 364–376. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.762480
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. N. (in press). Policy scientificity 3.0: Policy geophilosophy and education. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 30–51. doi:10.1177/0002716205276734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C. (1993). Race matters. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: England.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1965). The blue and brown books: Preliminary studies for the ‘philosophical investigations’. Rush Rhees, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar