The subject of policy

References

• Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report [Bradley review]. Retrieved from http://www.industry.gov.au/highereducation/ResourcesAndPublications/ReviewOfAustralianHigherEducation/Pages/ReviewOfAustralianHigherEducationReport.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan—How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In K. Knorr Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 277–303). London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Carrette, J. (2007). Religion and critical psychology: Religious experience in the knowledge economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 451–469. doi:10.1177/0305829813481006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2009). Another politics of life is possible. Theory, Culture and Society, 26(5), 44–60. doi:10.1177/0263276409106349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). On governmentality. Ideology & Consciousness, 6, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978–1979). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. In M. Senellart & M. Foucault (Eds.) (2008), The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. (2003). Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: Towards and analytics of government. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagennar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 247–267). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G., & Wortham, S. (1997). Rethinking authority: Interview with Homi K. Bhabha. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 2(2), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hukkinen, J., Roe, E., & Rochlin, G. I. (1990). A salt on the land: A narrative analysis of the controversy over irrigation-related salinity and toxicity in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Policy Sciences, 23(4), 307–329. doi:10.1007/BF00141324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38, 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamuf, P. (2007). Accounterability. Textual Practice, 21(2), 251–266. doi:10.1080/09502360701264428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 783–791. doi:10.1080/09518390600976006
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2012). The ruins of neo-liberalism and the construction of a new (scientific) subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 1021–1025. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9465-4
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2003). Is re-modernization occurring – And if so, how to prove it?: A commentary on Ulrich Beck. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(2), 35–48. doi:10.1177/0263276403020002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74–89). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, F., & Miorelli, R. (2013). Taking discourse seriously: Discursive institutionalism and post-structuralist discourse theory. Political Studies, 61, 301–331. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. The Journal of the Royal Institute, 5(4), 557–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd rev. ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Transforming Australia’s Higher Education System, Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/highereducation/Documents/TransformingAusHigherED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia, Advancing Equity and Participation in Australian Higher Education. (2008, April). Retrieved from http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au
   Google Scholar