A feel for numbers: affect, data and education policy

References

• Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., & Jacobsen, R. (Eds.). (2013). The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798. doi:10.1177/0309132510362600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bowe, R., Ball, S., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Husinger, L. Klastrup, & M. M. Allen (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., & Wells, A. S. (1997). The transformation of education and society: An introduction. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education culture economy society (pp. 1–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61. doi:10.1177/1368431008099643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorising the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 619–634. doi:10.1080/03054980600976320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N. (2002). Commensuration and cognition. In K. A. Cerulo (Ed.), Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition (pp. 63–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2000). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1983 (Vol. 3, pp. 201–222). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gatens, M. (1996). Through a Spinozist lens: Ethology, difference, power. In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 162–187). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gatens, M., & Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2013). Expert moves: International comparative testing and the rise of expertocracy. Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (1992). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. (1993). Gilles Deleuze: An apprenticeship in philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., Staunæs, D., & Ratner, H. (2013). The return of the Freudian Couch®: Managing affectivity through technologies of comfort. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(9), 1132–1152. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.816885
   Google Scholar
• Land, N. (1995). Meat (or How to Kill Oedipus in Cyberspace). Body & Society, 1(3–4), 191–204. doi:10.1177/1357034X95001003011
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P. (1998). Becoming-virtual: Reality in the digital age. New York, NY: Plenum Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, C., Parisi, L., & Terranova, T. (2012). Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(4–5), 3–35. doi:10.1177/0263276412454552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, M. (2013). ‘Datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 381–386. doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1987). Notes on the translation and acknowledgments. In G. Deleuze, & F. Guattari (Eds.), A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In M. Gregg, & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 52–70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. N. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Murphie, A. (2008). Clone your technics! Research creation, radical empiricism and the constraints of models. INFLeXions, 1. Retrieved from www.inflexions.org
   Google Scholar
• Novoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–438. doi:10.1080/0305006032000162002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). Making reform happen: Lessons from OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. doi:10.1080/02680930902733121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461. doi:10.1080/0305006032000162020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pors, J. G. (2009). Servile power: When something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Power and Education, 1(2), 201–213. doi:10.2304/power.2009.1.2.201
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, H., & Pors, J. G. (2013). Making invisible forces visible: Managing employees’ values and attitudes through transient emotions. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 7(3–4), 208–223. doi:10.1504/IJMCP.2013.056501
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E. (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(4–5), 116–136. doi:10.1177/0263276412439428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2014). Data infrastructure: A review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.931117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New modes of global governance in education. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/berj.3120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. (2011). Governing the potentials of life itself? Interrogating the promises in affective educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(3), 227–247. doi:10.1080/00220620.2011.586454
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44, 387–407. doi:10.1080/03050060802481413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2009). What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the ‘PISA shock’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 476–483. doi:10.2304/eerj.2009.8.3.476
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. (2012). Policy prolepsis in education: Encounters, becomings, and phantasms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2014). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, OnlineFirst. doi:10.1177/1357034X14539020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34, 1–24. doi:10.3102/0091732X09350472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. (2013). Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In H.-D. Meyer, & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 303–322). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar