What crisis of representation? Challenging the realism of post-structuralist policy research in education

References

• Adkins, L., & Lury, C. (2009). Introduction: What is the empirical? European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/1368431008099641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, V. (2008). Writing culture, holism, and the partialities of ethnographic inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725. doi:10.1177/1077800414530254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. (A. Sheridan, trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon (Ed.)). New York, NY: Random House LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium. FemaleMan_meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2011). Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2005, April). Scientism and scientificity in the rage for accountability: A feminist deconstruction. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2005). ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: Where’s the quality in systematic review? Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 393–416. doi:10.1080/02680930500131801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1986). Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. San Francisco: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B. (2004). Academic boundary work: The discursive constitution of scientificity among researchers in the humanities and social sciences. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. (2008). Saving social construction: Contributions from cultural studies. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1976). Translator’s preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology (pp. ix–lxxxix). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719. doi:10.1177/1077800414532435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., Frankham, J., & Stark, S. (2007). Sex, science and educational research: The unholy trinity. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 215–235. doi:10.1080/02680930601158968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2006). The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 201–214. doi:10.1080/02680930500500450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(3), 364–376.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2004). What does good education research look like?: Situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar