1,543
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Challenging fundraising, challenging inequity: contextual constraints on advocacy groups’ policy influence

Pages 54-73 | Received 13 Aug 2015, Accepted 05 Apr 2016, Published online: 25 Apr 2016

References

  • Allahar, A. L., & Côté, J. E. (1998). Richer and poorer: The structure of inequality in Canada. Toronto, ON: J. Lorimer.
  • Alphonso, C. (2005, July 15). Schools rely on the 4th ‘r’. The Globe and Mail, p. A6.
  • Alphonso, C., & Hammer, K. (2014, November 3). Toronto school fundraising raises questions about equity in public-education system. Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/education/fundraising-clout-gives-torontos-affluent-schools-a-wider-edge/article21421933/
  • Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, god and inequality (Vol. 2). New York: Routledge.
  • Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics Fo Education, 21(1), 45–57.
  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.
  • Ball, S. J., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of new labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169. doi:10.1080/02680930903486125
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York: Routledge.
  • Bedard, G. J., & Lawton, S. B. (2000). The struggle for power and control: Shifting policy-making models and the Harris agenda for education in Ontario. Canadian Public Administration, 43(3), 241–269. doi:10.1111/capa.2000.43.issue-3
  • Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London : Routledge.
  • Brent, B. O., & Lunden, S. (2009). Much ado about very little: The benefits and costs of school-based commercial activities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(3), 307–336. doi:10.1080/15700760802488619
  • Brown, L. (2002, June 13). School fund to spread cash: Well-off can raise money to help needy areas. The Toronto Star, p. C04.
  • Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714. doi:10.1177/0090591706293016
  • Canadian Press. (2011). McGuinty defends junk food ban, school fundraising. Retrieved July 21, 2015, from http://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/mcguinty-defends-junk-food-ban-school-fundraising-1.695912
  • Chase, M. M., Dowd, A. C., Pazich, L. B., & Bensimon, E. M. (2014). Transfer equity for ‘minoritized’ students: A critical policy analysis of seven states. Educational Policy, 28(5), 669–717. doi:10.1177/0895904812468227
  • Corbett, E. P. J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crawford, T. (1996). Middle class standing up to be counted. Toronto Star, p. F.1. Toronto, Ont., Canada, Toronto, Ont.
  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751
  • Dumas, M., & Anderson, G. L. (2014). Qualitative research as policy knowledge: Framing policy problems and transforming education from the ground up. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(11). doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n11.2014
  • Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Edwards, R., & Nicoll, K. (2001). Researching the rhetoric of lifelong learning. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 103–112. doi:10.1080/02680930010025310
  • Edwards, R., Nicoll, K., Solomon, N., & Usher, R. (2004). Rhetoric and educational discourse. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Evans, M. P., Newman, A., & Winton, S. (2015). Not your mother’s PTA: Hybridity in community-based organizations working for educational reform. The Educational Forum, 79(3), 263–279. doi:10.1080/00131725.2015.1037510
  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (2012). Introduction: The argumentative turn revisited. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 1–30). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Froese-Germain, B., Hawkey, C., Larose, A., McAdie, P., & Shaker, E. (2006). Commercialism in Canadian schools: Who’s calling the shots? Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
  • Frye, L. O. (2014, November 5). Fund-raising exacerbates existing disparities. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/11/04/is-fund-raising-good-or-bad-for-public-schools-15/school-fund-raising-is-unfair-but-unavoidable
  • Fulcher, G. (1999). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disabilty (Vol. 2). Sheffield, Great Britain: Philip Armstrong Publications.
  • Fundraising fever: Durham and Ontario schools turn to parents for money. (2012). Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.durhamregion.com/community-story/3505346-fundraising-fever-durham-and-ontario-schools-turn-to-parents-for-money/
  • Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Tracing the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(3), 393–407.
  • Gerstl-Pepin, C. I. (2002). Media (mis)representations of education in the 2000 presidential election. Educational Policy, 16(1), 37–55.
  • Gidney, R. D. (1999). From Hope to Harris: The reshaping of Ontario’s schools. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Goldberg, M. P. (2012). A retrospective look at the social construction of ‘skilled’ immigrant workers in Ontario. In B. L. Spencer, K. D. Gariepy, K. Dehli, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Canadian education: Governing practices and producing subjects (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 123–130; 7). Boston, MA: Sense.
  • Gottweis, H. (2012). Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States: Embodiments, scenographies and emotions. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 211–235). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Itkonen, T. (2009). Stories of hope and decline: Interest group effectiveness in national special education policy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 43–65. doi:10.1177/0895904808328526
  • Jacoby, D. (2011). Teacher unionization in school governance. Educational Policy, 25(5), 762–783. doi:10.1177/0895904810374852
  • Johnston, L. (2011). The real cost of public education: Fees, fundraising, equity and access in Ontario. Retrieved July 30, 2015, from http://educationactiontoronto.com/home/the-real-cost-of-public-education-fees-fundraising-equity-and-access-in-ontario
  • Kimelberg, S. M. (2014). Middle-class parents, risk, and urban public schools. In A. Lareau & K. A. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 207–236). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Lakoff, G. (2014). The all new don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and fram the debate (Pck Pap/Dv edition). White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
  • Landeros, M. (2011). Defining the ‘good mother’ and the ‘professional teacher’: Parent–teacher relationships in an affluent school district. Gender and Education, 23(3), 247–262. doi:10.1080/09540253.2010.491789
  • Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lareau, A., & Goyette, K. A. (2014). Middle-class parents, risk, and urban public schools. In A. Lareau & A. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. xi–xxiii). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63 (Journal Article), 5–25.
  • Leach, J. (2000). Rhetorical analysis. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 207–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lim, L. (2014). Ideology, rationality and reproduction in education: A critical discourse analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 61–76.
  • Lugg, C. (2006). On politics and theory: Using an explicitly activist theory to frame educational research. In V. A. Anfara & N. T. Mertz (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (pp. 175–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lugg, C., & Robinson, M. (2009). Religion, advocacy coalitions, and the politics of U.S. public schooling. Educational Policy, 23(1), 242–266. doi:10.1177/0895904808328527
  • Mahoney, J. (2008, May 23). Declining enrolment: Turn emptying schools into service hubs: Report. The Globe and Mail, A7.
  • Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Marchese, R. (2010, November 3). Education Funding. Ontario. Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Official Report of Debates (Hansard). 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. Retrieved from http://www.ontla.on.ca/
  • McDonnell, L. M. (2009). A political science persepctive on education policy analysis. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 57–70; 4). New York: Routledge.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., Scott, W. R., Deschenes, S., Hopkins, D., & Newman, A. (2009). Between movement and establishment: Organizations advocating for youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Metroland. (2012, June 6). Fundraising fever: The have-not schools in Durham and Ontario. Retrieved July 30, 2015, from http://www.durhamregion.com/community-story/3505339-fundraising-fever-the-have-not-schools-in-durham-and-ontario/
  • Miller, V. W. (2012). The broad challenge to democratic leadership: The other crisis in education. Democracy and Education, 20(2), 1–11.
  • Molnar, A. (2006). The commercial transformation of public education. Journal of Education Policy, 21(5), 621–640. doi:10.1080/02680930600866231
  • Newman, A., Deschenes, S., & Hopkins, K. (2012). From agitating in the streets to implementing in the Suites: Understanding education policy reforms initiated by local advocates. Educational Policy, 26(5), 730–758. doi:10.1177/0895904811417586
  • Oakes, J., Renée, M., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2008). Research and community organizing as tools for democratizing educational policymaking. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), The future of educational change: International perspectives (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 136–154). New York: Routledge.
  • Oakes, J., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2006). Learning power: Social inquiry, grassroots organizing, and educational justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Realizing the promise of diversity: Ontario’s equity and inclusive education strategy (Vol. 2008). Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/equity.pdf
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2012). Fundraising guideline. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/parents/fundraising.html
  • Opfer, V. D. (2001). Beyond self-interest: Educational interest groups and congressional influence. Educational Policy, 15(1), 135–152. doi:10.1177/0895904801015001008
  • Opfer, V. D., Young, T. V., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Politics of interest: Interest groups and advocacy coalitions in American education. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 196–216). New York: Routledge.
  • Orr, M., & Rogers, J. (2011). Unequal schools, unequal voice: The need for public engagement for public education. In M. Orr & J. Roges (Eds.), Public engagement for public education (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section, pp. 1–24; 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Pal, L. A. (2010). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times (4th ed.). Toronto: Nelson Education.
  • People for Education. (1996). Submission to Ontario’s standing committee on social development. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from www.ontla.on.ca
  • People for Education. (1999). The 1999 tracking report. Toronto, ON: Author.
  • People for Education. (2001). The 2001 tracking report. Toronto, ON: Author.
  • People for Education. (2006). 2006 Annual Report on Elementary Schools. Toronto, ON: Author.
  • People for Education. (2011). The measure of success; What really counts. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved from http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Annual-Report-on-Ontario-Schools-2011.pdf
  • People for Education. (2012). Making connections beyond school walls. Toronto. Retrieved from http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/research/annual-report/
  • People for Education. (2013a). Fees and fundraising. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved from www.peopleforeducation.ca
  • People for Education. (2013b). Mind the gap: Inequality in Ontario’s schools. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved from http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/research/p4e-reports-by-topic/
  • People for Education. (2015). Ontario’s schools: The gap between policy and reality. Retrieved July 21, 2015, from http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/research/annual-report/
  • Picus, L. O. (2014, November 5). School fund-raising is unfair but unavoidable. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/11/04/is-fund-raising-good-or-bad-for-public-schools-15/school-fund-raising-is-unfair-but-unavoidable
  • Pinto, L. (2012). Curriculum reform in Ontario: ‘Common Sense’ policy processes and democratic possibilities. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Pinto, L. E., & Blue, L. E. (2015). Pushing the entrepreneurial prodigy: Canadian aboriginal entrepreneurship education initiatives. Critical Studies in Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.1096291
  • Pistiolis, V. (2012). The results and implications of fundraising in elementary public schools: Interviews with Ontario principals. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
  • Porter, A. (2012). Neo-conservatism, neo-liberalism and Canadian social policy: Challenges for feminism. Canadian Woman Studies, 29(3), 19–31.
  • Posey-Maddox, L. (2013). Professionalizing the PTO: Race, class, and shifting norms of parental engagement in a city public school. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 235–260. doi:10.1086/668754
  • Robertson, H. (2005, Summer). The many faces of privatization. Our Schools, Our Selves, 14(4), 43–59.
  • Rushowy, K. (1999). Parents struggling with the new math of fundraising. Toronto Star, p. A1. Toronto.
  • Saltmarsh, S. (2015). Michel de Certeau, everyday life and policy cultures: The case of parent engagement in education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 38–54. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.961166
  • Sattem, J. L. (2007). Publicly funded, privately assisted: The role of giving in Oregon K-12 education. Oregon State University. Retrieved from https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/6193/Sattem%20MPP%20Essay.pdf?sequence=1
  • Scheurich, J. J. (1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 297–316. doi:10.1080/0268093940090402
  • School fundraising is raising questions. (2007, May 17). The Toronto Star, p. R7. Toronto, ON.
  • Scott, J. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106–136. doi:10.1177/0895904808328531
  • Selzer, J. (2004). Rhetorical analysis: Understanding how texts persuade readers. In P. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 279–307). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
  • Social Planning Toronto. (2011). Public system, private money: Fees, fundraising and equity in the Toronto district school board. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://socialplanningtoronto.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Public-System-Private-Money-Final-Full-Report.pdf
  • Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Vol. 3). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse, 18(1), 23–35.
  • Thomas, S. (2005). The construction of teacher identities in educational policy documents: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Studies in Education, 46(2), 25–44.
  • Toronto District School Board. (2013). 2013-2014 fundraising guide. Toronto, ON: Author.
  • Tota, P. M. (2014). Filling the gaps: The role and impact of international non-governmental organisations in “Education for All”. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(1), 92–109. doi:10.1080/14767724.2013.858988
  • Vincent, C., & Martin, J. (2002). Class, culture and agency: Researching parental voice. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 23(1), 108–127. doi:10.1080/01596300220123079
  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167.
  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2014). A mixed methods approach for identifying influence on public policy. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(2), 115–138. doi:10.1177/1558689813490996
  • Winsa, P. (2015, April 11). As fundraising gap grows, Toronto’s wealthy schools leaving poor schools behind. Toronto Star. The Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/yourtoronto/education/2015/04/11/as-fundraising-gap-grows-torontos-wealthy-schools-leaving-poor-schools-behind.html
  • Winsa, P., & Rushowy, K. (2011). Rich schools get richer thanks to private cash. Toronto Star, pp. A1, A6. Toronto.
  • Winton, S. (2008). The appeal(s) of character education in threatening times: Caring and critical democratic responses. Comparative Education, 44(3), 305–316. doi:10.1080/03050060802264843
  • Winton, S. (2013a). How schools define success: The influence of local contexts on the meaning of success in three schools in Ontario, Canada. Canadian and International Education, 42(1). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cie-eci/vol42/iss1/5
  • Winton, S. (2013b). Rhetorical analysis in critical policy research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(2), 158–177. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.666288
  • Winton, S., & Brewer, C. (2014). People for education: A critical policy history. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 27(9), 1091–1109.
  • Wong, J. (2002, November 23). Teacher, can you spare a dime? The Globe and Mail, p. F1. Toronto.
  • Yair, G. (2007). Meritocracy. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (Vols. 1–Book, 1–Section). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Retrieved June 9, 2015 from Blackwell Reference Online.
  • Zimmer, R. W., Krop, C., & Brewer, D. J. (2003). Private resources in public schools: Evidence from a pilot study. Journal of Education Finance, 28, 485–522.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.