1,207
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perpetuating academic capitalism and maintaining gender orders through career practices in STEM in universities

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 205-225 | Received 09 Feb 2016, Accepted 14 Sep 2016, Published online: 06 Oct 2016

References

  • Adkins, L. (2002). Revisions: Gender and sexuality in late modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Amsler, S. S., & Bolsmann, C. (2012). University ranking as social exclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33, 283–301. doi:10.1080/01425692.2011.649835
  • Anthias, F. (1999). Theorizing identity, difference and social divisions. In M. O’Brien, S. Penna, & C. Hay (Eds.), Theorizing modernity: Reflexivity, environment and identity in Giddens’ social theory (pp. 156–178). London: Longman.
  • Bagilhole, B., & Goode, J. (2001). The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 161–180. doi:10.1177/135050680100800203
  • Bagilhole, B., & White, K. (Eds.), (2011). Gender, power and management: A cross cultural analysis of higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
  • Bullard, D. B. (2007). Academic capitalism in the social sciences: Faculty responses to the entrepreneurial university ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Florida.
  • Chan, A., & Fisher, D. (Eds.), (2008). The exchange university: Corporatization of academic culture. Vancouver: University British Columbia Press.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Paris: International Association of Universities and Elsevier Science.
  • Collyer, F. M. (2014). Practices of conformity and resistance in the marketisation of the academy: Bourdieu, professionalism and academic capitalism. Critical Studies in Education, 56, 315–331. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.985690
  • Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  • Connell, R. (2010). Understanding neoliberalism. In S. Braedley & M. Luxton (Eds.), Neoliberalism and everyday life (pp. 22–36). Montrea: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
  • Danowitz-Sagaria, M., & Agans, L. J. (2006). Gender equality in U.S. higher education: Inter/national framing and institutional realities. In K. Yokoyama (Ed.), Gender and higher education: Australia, Japan, the UK and USA (pp. 47–68). Hiroshima: Higher Education Institute Press.
  • David, M. E. (2011). Overview of researching global higher education: Challenge, change or crisis? Contemporary Social Science, 6, 147–163. doi:10.1080/21582041.2011.580610
  • David, M. E. (2014). Feminism, gender, and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37, 7–20. doi:10.1080/03050060020020408
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–42). California: Sage.
  • Devine, D., Grummell, B., & Lynch, K. (2011). Crafting the elastic self? gender and identities in senior appointments in Irish education. Gender Work and Organization, 18, 631−649. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00513.x
  • Dillabough, J. A., & Acker, S. (2008). Gender at work in teacher education: History, society and global reform. In A. Chan & D. Fisher (Eds.), The exchange university: Corporatization of academic culture (pp. 147–167). Vancouver: University British Columbia Press.
  • EU (2015). She Figures. [data set]. Retrieved October 24 2015 from. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2013_en.pdf/
  • Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22, 1240–1253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
  • Ferguson, J. (2009). The uses of neo-liberalism. Antipode, 41, 166–184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00721.x
  • Franklin, S., Lury, C., & Stacey, J. (2000). Units of genealogy. In S. Franklin, C. Lury, & J. Stacey (Eds.), Global culture, global nature (pp. 68–93). London: Sage.
  • Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review,56, 97–117. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/II/56
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ginther, D. K. (2004). Why women earn less. Economic explanations for the gender equality gap in science. AWIS Magazine, 33, 6–10. Retrieved from http://www.people.ku.edu/~dginther/Publications/AWIS%20Magazine%20Ginther%20article.pdf
  • Gottfried, H. (1994). Learning the score: The duality of control and everyday resistance in the temporary-help service industry. In J. M. Jermier, D. Knights, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations (pp. 102–127). London: Routledge.
  • Gray, B. (2004). Women and the Irish diaspora. London: Routledge.
  • Grummell, B., Devine, D., & Lynch, K. (2009). The care-less manager: Gender, care and new managerialism in higher education. Gender and Education, 21, 191–208. doi:10.1080/09540250802392273
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neo-liberalism. London: Oxford.
  • Hey, V. (2011). Affective asymmetries: Academics, austerity and the mis/recognition of emotion. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 207–222. doi:10.1080/21582041.2011.583486
  • Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its CHallenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). London: Sage.
  • Husu, L. (2000). Gender discrimination in the promised land of gender equality. Higher Education in Europe, 25, 221–228. doi:10.1080/713669257
  • Husu, L. (2013). Recognize hidden roadblocks. Laboratory life: Scientists of the world speak up for equality. Nature, 495, 35–38. doi:10.1038/495035a
  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. California: Sage.
  • Lash, S. (1994). Reflexivity and its doubles: Structure, aesthetics, community. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 110–173). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Lynch, K. (2014). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56, 190–207. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.949811
  • Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education: Commercialisation, carelessness and gender. London: Palgrave.
  • Lynch, K., & Ivancheva, M. (2015). Academic freedom and commercialisation of universities: A critical ethical analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 15, 71–85. doi:10.3354/esep00160
  • McGettigan, A. (2013). The Great University Gamble: Money, markets and the future of higher education. London: Pluto Press.
  • McKinnon, A. (2005). Girls, school and society: A generation of change? Clare burton memorial lecture, 2005. University of South Australia. Retrieved from https://odu.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/Clare_Burton_2005_Lecture.pdf
  • McRobbie, A. (2013). Feminism, the family and the new ‘mediated’ maternalism. New Formations, 80, 119–137. doi:10.3898/newF.80/81.07.2013
  • Menzies, H., & Newson, J. (2007). No time to think: Academics’ life in the globally wired university. Time and Society, 16, 83–98. doi:10.1177/0961463X07074103
  • Moore, R. (2008). Capital. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 101–117). Durham, NC: Acumen.
  • Moreau, M. P., Osgood, J., & Halsall, A. (2007). Making sense of the glass ceiling in schools: An exploration of women teachers’ discourses. Gender and Education, 19, 237−253. doi:10.1080/09540250601166092
  • Morley, L. (2008). The micropolitics of professionalism: Power and collective identities in higher education. Exploring professionalism. London: Bedford Way Papers.
  • Morley, L. (2011). Misogyny posing as measurement: Disrupting the feminisation crisis discourse. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 223–235. doi:10.1080/21582041.2011.580615
  • Morley, L. (2013). Women and higher education leadership: Absences and aspirations. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
  • Morley, L. (2014). Education and neo-liberal globalization (review of the book: Education and neoliberal globalization, by C. A. Torres). British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3, 457–468. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.893072
  • Morley, L. (2016). Troubling intra-actions: Gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy. Journal of Education Policy, 31, 28–45. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1062919
  • O’Connor, P. (2014). Management and gender in higher education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • O’Connor, P. (2015). Good jobs but places for women? Gender and Education, 27, 304–319. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1021302
  • O’Connor, P., & O’Hagan, C. (2015). Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: A problematic reality? Studies in Higher Education. Published online: February 06 2015. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.1000292
  • O’Hagan, C. (2015). Complex inequality and ‘working mothers’. Cork: Cork University Press.
  • Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rhoades, G. (2005). Capitalism, academic style and shared governance. Academe, 3, 38–42. doi:10.2307/40252785
  • Rose, N. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In P. Heelas & P. Morris (Eds.), The values of the enterprise culture: The moral debate (pp. 141–164). London: Routledge.
  • Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28, 418–437. doi:10.1080/09502386.2013.857361
  • Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8, 2154–2161. doi:10.1177/1350508401082003
  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2000). The neo-liberal university. New Labor Forum, 6, 73–79.
  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Taylor, C. (1993). To follow a rule. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 45–60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Thornton, M. (2013). The mirage of merit. Australian Feminist Studies, 28, 127–143. doi:10.1080/08164649.2013.789584
  • Thornton, M. (2014). Through a glass darkly: The social sciences look at the neoliberal University. Canberra: ANU Press.
  • Treanor, P. (2007). Neoliberalism: Origins, theory, definition. Retrieved from: http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html
  • Urry, J. (2004). Small worlds and the new ‘social physics’. Global Networks, 4, 109–130. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00083.x
  • van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 19, 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x
  • Walker, J. (2009). Time as the fourth dimension in the globalization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 483–509. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0061
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Wellen, R. (2009). Neo-liberalism (review of the book: The exchange University: Corporatization of academic culture. In A. S. Chan & D. Fisher (Eds.), Academic matters. Retrieved from http://www.academicmatters.ca/2009/03/grappling-with-academic-capitalism-in-canadian-universities/
  • White, K. (2014). Keeping women in science. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing” gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 17, 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002
  • Zabrodska, K., Linnell, S., Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2011). Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal Universities. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 709–719. doi:10.1177/1077800411420668

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.