Market mobilities/immobilities: mutation, path-dependency, and the spread of charter school policies in the United States

References

• Allen, J. (Ed.). (2014). Education reform: Before it was cool: The real story and pioneers who made it happen. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W., & Ferrare, J. J. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Temenos, C. (2015). Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 824–827. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345. doi:10.1080/14747731003669669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkley, K. E. (2004). Reinventing an idea: The political construction of charter schools. Educational Foundations, 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkley, K. (2005). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: The cases of Arizona, Michigan and Georgia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(4), 527–554. doi:10.1080/09518390500137683
   Google Scholar
• Buras, K. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, C. (2014). Discourse yes, implementation maybe: An immobility and paralysis of sustainable development policy. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1824–1840. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.806433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (1995, May 11). Oregon House Defeats Charter School Proposal.). The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (1997, July 4). Onetime Backer Votes No, Dooms Charter Schools. The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (1998). Efforts heat up to create charter schools. The Oregonian, November 16. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (1999, February 4). Senate Approves Charter School Bill. The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Cascade Policy Institute. (2006). Oregon charter school report card: The history, progress and future of charter schools in Oregon (p. 25). Portland, OR: Author. Retrieved from http://cascadepolicy.org/blog/2006/05/26/oregon-charter-school-report-card-the-history-progress-and-future-of-charter-schools-in-oregon/
   Google Scholar
• Clinton Digital Library. (n.d.). Domestic Policy Council, Bruce Reed, and Education Series, ‘Charter Schools [1]’. Clinton Digital Library. Retrieved from http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/22375
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Lizotte, C. (2015). Teaching the market: Fostering consent to education markets in the United States. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1824–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I. R., & Ward, K. (2012). Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden “BID ready”. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(2), 137–152. doi:10.1177/0969776411420029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L. (2011, November 16). How online learning companies bought America’s schools. The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/how-online-learning-companies-bought-americas-schools/
   Google Scholar
• Fiddling while kids wait Oregon lawmakers have twice failed to pass a charter-school law. (1998, November 24). The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Forman, J. J. (2004). Secret history of school choice: How progressives got there first. The Georgetown Law Journal, 93, 1287–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Get the fine print right (1999, January 15). The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Goenner, J. (2011). The origination of Michigan’s charter school policy: An historical analysis. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418. doi:10.1177/0042098010374510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottesdiener, L. (2015). Republicans trashed democracy in Michigan. Now they want to trash it in your state, too. Retrieved April 14, 2016, from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/06/michigan-detroit-austerity-democracy-environment
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. K., & Burr, S. (1996). The story of California’s charter school legislation. The Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 37–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R. (1995). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. L., Bates, M., Pattison, K., & Ray, R. A. (2011). COSA fall conference for Special Education Administrators: Oregon Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.cosa.k12.or.us/downloads/profdev/SPED%202011/Handouts/2011%2010%20COSA%20SpEd%20final2.pptx
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, I. (2014, September 16). A New Orleans model for Detroit? Detroit News. Retrieved from http://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/08/29/column-a-new-orleans-model-for-detroit/14817041/
   Google Scholar
• Junge, E. R. (2012, June 13). Reclaiming the origins of chartered schools. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/06/13/35junge_ep.h31.html
   Google Scholar
• Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education (Policy Report No. 8). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kolderie, T. (1995). [A guide to charter activity (2nd ed.)]. Domestic Policy Council, Bruce Reed, and Education Series, ‘Charter Schools [2]’. Clinton Digital Library. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/22376
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502. doi:10.1080/03050068.2011.555941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2001). Institutionalist and incrementalist perspectives on ‘public’ education: Strategies and implications of the schools choice movement in Michigan. New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. L., & Arsen, D. (2014). Michigan’s education achievement authority and the future of public education in Detroit: The challenge of aligning policy design and policy goals (Working Paper No. 43). East Lansing, MI: Education Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2013). Vocabularies of the economy. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 54, 9–22. doi:10.3898/136266213807299023
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51. doi:10.1068/a44178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2015). Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 828–830. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melanie, S. (2014). Growing charters in the garden state. In J. Allen (Ed.), Education reform: Before it was cool: The real story and pioneers who made it happen (pp. 69–72). Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, B. (2004). Seed money for conservatives. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/voucher_report/v_seed184.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. (2011). Confronting the seduction of choice: Law, education, and American pluralism. The Yale Law Journal, 814–848. http://www.yalelawjournal.org/feature/confronting-the-seduction-of-choice-law-education-and-american-pluralism
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Lizotte, C. (2014). The grassroots and the gift: Moral authority, American philanthropy, and activism in education. Foucault Studies, 18(Oct), 66–89.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, A. (1998). Smaller classes not vouchers increase student achievement. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448225\
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2014). (Im-)Mobile policies: Why sustainability went wrong in the 2014 Olympics in Sochi. European Urban and Regional Studies, 969776414523801. doi:10.1177/0969776414523801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2014). A growing movement: America’s largest charter school communities: Ninth annual edition. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_216.90.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2014). School voucher laws: State-by-state comparison. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/documents/educ/StateByStateVoucherComparison.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oancă, A. (2015). Europe is not elsewhere: The mobilization of an immobile policy in the lobbying by Perm (Russia) for the European capital of culture title. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(2), 179–190. doi:10.1177/0969776414535419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Education. (2015). Fall membership report 2014-2015. Salem: Oregon Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2012). Recreative city: Amsterdam, vehicular ideas and the adaptive spaces of creativity policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 462–485. doi:10.1111/ijur.2012.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30. doi:10.1068/a44179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, T. C. (2011). Urban shrinkage as performance of whiteness: Neo-liberal urban restructuring, education, and racial containment in the post-industrial, global niche city. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (2010). Saving schools : From Horace Mann to virtual learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, D. (1994, December 15). Chart(er)ing new paths to school reform. The Oregonian. Portland, Oregon. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106–136. doi:10.1177/0895904808328531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009, June 8). States open to charters start fast in ‘race to top’ [press release]. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/06/06082009a.html
   Google Scholar
• Viteritti, J. P. (1998). Blaine’s wake: School choice, the first amendment, and state constitutional Law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 21(3), 657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2006). “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75. doi:10.1111/ijur.2006.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar