Policy mobilities and methodology: a proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies

References

• Allen, J. (2011). Topological twists: Power’s shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1(3), 283–298. doi:10.1177/2043820611421546
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 385–399. doi:10.1068/a3439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Levitt, K. (Ed.). (2003). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arnove, R., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (1999). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., & LeTendre, G. K. (Eds.). (2005). National differences, global similarities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2016). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 1–18. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2),10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buraway, M. (2009). The extended case method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2011). Introduction: Mobile methods. In M. Büscher, J. Urry, & K. Witchger (Eds.), Mobile methods (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2012). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366–393. doi:10.1086/665708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A., & Ward, K. (2012). Guest editorial – Researching the geographies of policy mobility: Confronting the methodological challenges. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 5–12. doi:10.1068/a44176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., & Merriam, P. (2011). Introduction: Geographies of mobility: Practices, spaces, subjects. In T. Cresswell & P. Merriam (Eds.), Geographies of mobility: Practices, spaces, subjects (pp. 1–17). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1),39–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. doi:10.2307/778828
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multi-modal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 77–96. doi:10.1177/1468794106058876
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. (2011). Are some things unrepresentable? Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7–8), 85–102. doi:10.1177/0263276411423038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldie, D., Linick, M., Jabbar, H., & Lubienski, C. (2014). Using bibliometric and social media analyses to explore the ‘echo chamber’ hypothesis. Educational Policy, 28(2),281–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial theories of education: policy and geography matters. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3),389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M., & Schwanen, T. (2016). Geographies of mobility. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 243–256. doi:10.1080/24694452.2015.1123067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. A., & Beech, J. (2014). Spatial theorizing in comparative and international education research. Comparative Education Review, 58(2),191–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2013). A systemless system: Designing the disarticulation of English state education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 231–241. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.2.231
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2016). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 1–22. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Hardy, I. (2016). Tracking the topological: The effects of standardised data upon teachers’ practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1–20. doi:10.1080/00071005.2016.1254157
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). ‘PISA for Schools’: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57. doi:10.1086/684458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). Globalization, edu-business and network governance: The policy sociology of Stephen J. Ball and rethinking education policy analysis. London Review of Education, 11(3), 265–280. doi:10.1080/14748460.2013.840986
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2014). Representing your country: Scotland, PISA and new spatialities of educational governance. Scottish Educational Review, 46(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (2012). Introduction: A perpetual inventory. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Routedge.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., Parisi, L., & Terranova, T. (2012). Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2011). Introduction. Urban assemblages: Territories, relations, practices, and power. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. xiii–xxxv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51. doi:10.1068/a44178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2015). Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 828–830. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M., Bieler, A., & McNeil, R. (2015). Education policy mobility: Reimagining sustainability in neoliberal times. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 319–337. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.993934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane, I. (2016). ‘Educare’ in Australia: Analysing policy mobility and transformation. Educational Research, 58(2), 179–194. doi:10.1080/00131881.2016.1165413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, T. (Eds.). (2016). The global handbook of education policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2012). Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmedo, A. (2016). Philanthropic governance: Charitable companies, the commercialisation of education and that thing called ‘democracy’. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), The global education industry (pp. 44–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olmedo, A. (2017). Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: Philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education, 43(1), 69–87. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (Eds.). (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30. doi:10.1068/a44179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 425–447). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing educational policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2015). ‘Arriving at’ urban policies: The topological spaces of urban policy mobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 831–834. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. (2011). The new spatial politics of (re) bordering and (re) ordering the state-education-citizen relation. International Review of Education, 57(3–4), 277–297
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015a). Data infrastructure: A review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 765–777. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.931117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015b). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. doi:10.1002/berj.3120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407. doi:10.1080/03050060802481413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2016). World yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. doi:10.3102/0091732X09350472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar