Placing PISA and PISA for schools in two federalisms, Australia and the USA

References

• Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 385–399. doi:10.1068/a3439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2012). Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2016). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000-2014. Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1252856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, J. (2016). A governmentality perspective on the common core. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(20), 230–240.
   Google Scholar
• Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Papers, 71, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L. M., & Costa, E. (2015). Seeing education with one’s own eyes and through PISA lenses: Considerations of the reception of PISA in European countries. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 638–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, L. C., & Frizzell, M. O. (2015). Competitive comparison and PISA bragging rights: Sub-national uses of the OECD’s PISA in Canada and the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 665–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15, 598–616. doi:10.1177/1474904116658299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, S., & Wu, M. (2015). Leaning too far? PISA, policy and Australia’s ‘top five’ ambitions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 647–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursh, D. (2016). The end of public schools: The corporate reform agenda to privatise public education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Hunter, A., Sonnemann, J., & Burns, T. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Melbourne: Gratton Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., Bullen, E., Fahey, J., & Robb, S. (2006). Haunting the knowledge economy. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2016). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 1–22. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Lingard, B. (2015). The multiple effects of international large-scale assessment on education policy and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 621–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). ‘PISA for Schools’: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57. doi:10.1086/684458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Lewis, S. (2016). Globalisation of the Anglo-American approach to top-down, test-based educational accountability. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 387–403). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22(3), 314–332. doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.794455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., Niemann, D., & Teltemann, J. (2016). Effects of international assessments in education - a multidisciplinary review. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 516–522. doi:10.1177/1474904116668886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Better skills, better jobs, better lives: A strategic approach to skills policies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264177338-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013a). International benchmarking for school improvement: The OECD Test for Schools (based on PISA): An introduction to the assessment Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisa-based-test-for-schools-assessment.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201118-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). About PISA. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, G. (1994). Education 1960-1990: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, D. (2015). The OECD and the local: PISA-based Test for Schools in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 683–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saultz, A., McEachin, A., & Fusarelli, L. (2016). Waivering as governance: Federalism during the Obama Administration. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 358–366. doi:10.3102/0013189X16663495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C., & O’Connor, K. (2015). National agendas in global times: Curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 609–630. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.969321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (1990) The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education (pp. 25-83). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2015). New literacisation, curricular isomorphism and the OECD’s PISA. In M. Hamilton, B. Maddox, & C. Addey (Eds.), Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment (pp. 17–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tampio, N. (2016). Democracy and national education standards. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldow, F., Takayama, K., & Sung, Y.-K. (2014). Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing: Media discourses over the ‘Asian Tigers’ PISA success in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Comparative Education, 50(3), 302–321. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.860704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlam, G. (1985). The whitlam government. Ringwood: Penguin.
   Google Scholar