Towards productive critique of large-scale comparisons in education

References

• Banks, G. (2009). Evidence-based policy making: What is it, and how do we get it? In J. Wanna (Ed.), Critical refelctions on Australian public policy - selected essays (pp. 107–113). Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). General Introduction. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bottani, N. (1996). OECD international education indicators. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(3), 279–288. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(96)82857-6
   Google Scholar
• Breakspeare, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance OECD Education Working Paper (Vol. 71). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C., Gross, N., & Lamont, M. (2011). The study of social knowledge making. In C. Camic, N. Gross, & M. Lamont (Eds.), Social knowledge in the making (pp. 1–40). London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2005). Evidence-based practice in education research: A critical realist critique of systematic review. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 415–428. doi:10.1080/01425690500128932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dersken, L. (2000). Towards a sociology of measurement: The meaning of measurement error in the case of DNA profiling. Social Studies of Science, 30(6), 803–845. doi:10.1177/030631200030006001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge, Mass. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2011). Policy as Assemblage. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 611–622. doi:10.2304/eerj.2011.10.4.611
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72. doi:10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.58
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2015). Producing calculable worlds: education at a glance. Discourse-studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 578-595. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2015.974942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2016). The “thin descriptions” of the secondary analyses of PISA. Education and Society, 37(136), 647–688. doi:10.1590/es0101-73302016166211
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R., & Wu, M. (2015). Leaning too far? PISA, policy and Australia’s ‘top five’ ambitions. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 647–664. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.930020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyneman, S. P. (2003). The history and problems in the making of education policy at World Bank 1960-2000. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 315–337. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00053-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Pennock, D., Ritzen, J., Ahtaridou, E., & Zimmer, K. (2008). External evaluation of the policy impact of PISA (Vol. EDU/PISA/GB(2008)35/REV1). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2011). The practices of objectivity in regulatory science. In C. Camic, N. Gross, & M. Lamont (Eds.), Social knowledge in the making (pp. 307–338). Chicago and London: The Unviersity of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017). What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using PISA data. In Department of quantitative social science (Ed.) Vol. Working Paper No. 17-04) Online. London: Institute of Education, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action - how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Padora’s hope - essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA; London, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(Winter), 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Online: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, R., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalising educational accountabilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2005). Government, knowledge and the business of policy making: The potential and limits of evidence-based policy. Evidence and Policy, 1(2), 215–226. doi:10.1332/1744264053730789
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance - the long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 - PISA results in focus. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (2012). Thin description: surface and depth in science and science studies. Osiris, 27(209–226), . doi: 10.1086/667828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2016). National Evidence Base, Draft Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in finland. New York; London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, R. (2013). The OECD and Global Governance in Education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. A. (2005). UNESCO’s International Literacy Statistics 1950-2000 Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006 - Literacy for Life. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719. doi:10.1177/1077800414532435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations,’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2011). Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 48–63. doi:10.1215/0961754x-2010-035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991). Beyond the citation debate: Towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 18, 319–332. doi:10.1093/spp/18.5.319
   Google Scholar