Standardisation and diversity in international assessments: barking up the wrong tree?

References

• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, T., Martens, K., Newmann, D., & Teltemann, J. (2015). Towards a global model in education? International student literacy assessments and their impact on policies and institutions. In M. Hamilton, B. Maddox, & C. Addey (Eds.), Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment regimes (pp. 165–186). Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro, R., & Gordon, J. (2013). Warranting our future: Literacy and literacies. European Journal of Education, 48(4), 476–497. doi:10.1111/ejed.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefai, C., Clouder, C., Antoganzza, D., & Boland, N. (2014). From PISA to Santander: A statement on children’s growth and wellbeing. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(2), 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (1998). Anyone for Tennis? Social class differences in children’s responses to national curriculum mathematics testing. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 115–148. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children´s mathematical knowledge. Social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dall, A. (2011). Is PISA counter-productive to building successful educational systems? Social Alternatives, 30(4), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dept, S., Ferrari, A., & Wäyrynen, L. (2010). Developments in translation verification procedures in three multilingual assessments: A plea for an integrated translation and adaptation monitoring tool. In J. A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. P. Mohler, & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (pp. 157–173). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470609927.ch9
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, S. S., Gruenewald, T. L., & Kemeny, M. E. (2011). Physiological effects of social threat: Implications for health. In J. Decety & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 787–803). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1934). On the method of theoretical physics. Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 163–169. doi:10.1086/286316
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. (2007). What is intelligence?: Beyond the Flynn effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (2000). The interpretation of cultures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2015). Assembling a sociology of numbers. In M. Hamilton, B. Maddox, & C. Addey (Eds.), Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment regimes (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (2008). Assessing national achievement levels in education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (Eds.). (2011). Implementing a national assessment of educational achievement. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2015). Transnational education policy-making: International assessments and the formation of a new institutional order. In M. Hamilton, B. Maddox, & C. Addey (Eds.), Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment regimes (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guadalupe, C., & Cardoso, M. (2011). Measuring the continuum of literacy skills among adults: Educational testing and the LAMP experience. International Review of Education, 57(1–2), 199–217. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9203-2
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting psychological and educational tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2001). Privileged literacies: Policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education, 15, 178–196. doi:10.1080/09500780108666809
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2000). The international adult literacy survey: What does it really measure? International Review of Education, 46, 377–389. doi:10.1023/A:1004125413660
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. ITC. Retrieved from http://www.intestcom.org
   Google Scholar
• Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalisation and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for “best practices” and magic bullets. In H.-D. Mayer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 117–140). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kamens, D. H., & Mcneely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25. doi:10.1086/648471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The relation between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1013–1037. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9534-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2014). Representing your country: Scotland, PISA and new spatialities of educational governance. Scottish Educational Review, 46, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive development, its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, B. (2014). Globalising assessment: An ethnography of literacy assessment, camels and fast food in the Mongolian Gobi. Comparative Education, 50(4), 474–489. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.871440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddox, B. (2015). The neglected situation: Assessment performance and interaction in context. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–17. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1026246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2007). How to become an influential actor: The “comparative turn” in OECD education policy. In K. Martens, A. Rusconi, & K. Leuze (Eds.), New arenas of education governance. The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policy making (pp. 40–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22(3), 314–332. doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.794455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1983). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie  [Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy]. In Marx-Engels Werke [Works by Marx & Engels]. Band [Vol.42]. Institute for Marxism-Leninism. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Olivos, T. (2010). Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo: las muchas caras de la evaluación  [The good, the bad and the ugly: the many faces of assessment]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 1(2), 84-97.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://timss.bc.edu/methods/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M., Minnich, C., Drucker, K. T., & Ragan, M. (Eds.). (2012). PIRLS 2011 encyclopedia (Vol. 2). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M., Minnich, C., Stanco, G., Arora, A., Centurino, V., & Castle, C. (Eds.). (2012). TIMSS 2011 encylopedia (Vol. 2). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Hoffman, A. B. (2012). Concepts. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive science (Kindle). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. S., Kirsh, I., & Jenkins, L. (1997). Adult literacy in OECD countries: Technical report on the first international adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: NCES.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Ríordáin, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). The relationship between performance on mathematical word problems and language proficiency for students learning through the medium of Irish. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 43–64. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9158-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013b). Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/piaac/publications.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD & Canada: Statistics Canada. (2005). Learning a living: First results of the adult literacy and life skills survey. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/learning-a-living_9789264010390-en
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2010). Decoding, vocabulary, and comprehension: The golden triangle of reading skill. In M. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading researchers to life: Essays in honor of Isabel Beck (pp. 291–303). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing systems variations. In K. Koda & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 13–38). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Rieben, L. (1991). Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). PISA and the expanding role of the OECD in global education governance. In H.-D. Mayer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 185–206). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G. (2016). Comments on valid (and invalid?) commentaries. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 319–321. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1158694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair, R. (2012). The limits of levels: Understanding the International Adult Literacy Surveys (IALS). International Review of Education, 58, 759–776. doi:10.1007/s11159-013-9330-z
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10, 1–24. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80103-X
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO/UIS. (2009). The next generation of literacy statistics. Implementing the Literacy Assessment and Monitoring Programme (LAMP). Montreal: Author. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/Tech1-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 457–466. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, S. (2003). Fundamental of standardized testing. San Antonio. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/tmrs_rg/Fundamentals_of_Standardized_Testing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 223–233. doi:10.1080/15434300701375832
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B., & Hubley, A. M. (2016). Bringing consequences and side effects of testing and assessment to the foreground. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 299–303. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1141169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar