Micro-political practices in higher education: a challenge to excellence as a rationalising myth?

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1998). The future of gender and organizations: Connections and boundaries. Gender, Work and Organization, 5(4), 195–206. doi:10.1111/gwao.1998.5.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, D. D., Bitanc, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., & D’Enbeau, S. (2009). Stories of caregiving: Intersections of academic research and women’s everyday experiences. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(7), 1199–1224. doi:10.1177/1077800409338025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Blackwell: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2010). Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes. Research Policy, 39, 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, J., Thiele, B., & Harris, P. (2002). Gendered universities in globalised economies. Oxford: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, K. M. (2008). Women’s accounts of organizational politics as a gendering process. Gender, Work & Organization, 15(6), 650–671. doi:10.1111/gwao.2008.15.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E. (2017). Informality and state theory: Some concluding remarks. Current Sociology, 65(2), 315–324. doi:10.1177/0011392116657301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebreiro, 1., & San Segundo, M.J. (1998). Spain. In: De Groof J, Neave GR and Svec J (eds) Democracy and governance in higher education. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp.359-364.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., Hilliard, S., & Reed, M. (2008). Knowledge, higher education and the new managerialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2004) Gender and excellence in the making. Retrieved from https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/41563255/GenderMainstreaming.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU (2012). Structural Change in research institutions: Enhancing excellence, gender equality and efficiency in research and innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/structural-changes-final-report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2015) She figures: Gender in research and innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. (2004). Blocking the use of gender-based double standards for competence. In Gender and excellence in the making (EU report) (pp. 51–57). Retrieved June 15, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/bias_brochure_final_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. (2006). On the application files design for the study of competence and double standards. Sociological Focus, 39(2), 115–132. doi:10.1080/00380237.2006.10571280
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2008). Adding insult to injury: Nancy fraser debates her critics. ( K. Olson, Ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Grummell, B., Lynch, K., & Devine, D. (2009). Appointing senior managers in education: Homosociability, local logics and authenticity in the selection process. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 37(3), 329–349. doi:10.1177/1741143209102783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. doi:10.1177/0003122409357044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. (2017) Higher educational institutional staff profiles by gender. Retrieved from http://hea.ie/2017/07/19/report-on-higher-education-institutional-staff-profiles-by-gender-published/
   Google Scholar
• Healy, G., Özbilgin, M., & Aliefendioğlu, H. (2005). Academic employment and gender: A Turkish challenge to vertical sex segregation. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(2), 247–264. doi:10.1177/0959680105053966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husu, L. (2014) Research funding gap: Her excellence dwarfed by his excellence. Retrieved from http://euroscientist.com/2014/06/research-funding-gap-excellence-dwarfed-excellence/
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., Carter, N., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, S. K., & McDonald, C. (2017). Underpinning excellence in higher education – An investigation into the leadership, governance and management behaviours of high-performing academic departments. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 210–231. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1036849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think inside the curious world of academic judgement. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Cooper, C. L. (2005). Work-life integration: Case studies of organisational change. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2015). In the wings and backstage: Exploring the micropolitics of leadership in higher education. London: Leadership Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (2014). Control by numbers: New managerialism and rankings in Higher Education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., Gummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education: Commercialisation, carelessness and gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘Said and done’ ‘versus ‘Saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender Work and Organization, 13(3), 254–276. doi:10.1111/gwao.2006.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes López, E. (2017) Academic career development and gender. Case study of the University of Salamanca (Desarrollo de la carrera académica y género: Las explicaciones que el profesorado universitario da a la desigual posición de la mujer en la Universidad de Salamanca.) ( Ph.D thesis submitted to the University of Salamanca).
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (1999). Organising feminisms: The micropolitics of the academy. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. (2016). Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, A. E., & Zilberstein-Levy, R. (2006). Planning for academic excellence: Tenure and professional considerations. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 537–554. doi:10.1080/03075070600922725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P. (2014). Management and gender in higher education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P., & O’Hagan, C. (2016). Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: A problematic reality? Studies in Higher Education 41(11:0), 1943–1957. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.1000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, C., O’Connor, P., Myers, E. S., Baisner, L., Apostolov, G., Topuzova, I., … Çağlayan, H. (2016). Perpetuating academic capitalism and maintaining gender orders through career practices in STEM in universities. Critical Studies in Education, 1–21. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1238403
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos Insead, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio, B. (2010). Vertical segregation and gender practices. Perspectives of analysis and action. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 428–437. doi:10.1108/17542411011069864
   Google Scholar
• QS. (2017) World University rankings 2016-17. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016
   Google Scholar
• Rhoton, L. A. (2011). Distancing as a gendered barrier: Understanding women scientists gender practices. Gender & Society, 25(6), 696–716. doi:10.1177/0891243211422717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J., & Davis, G. (2013). From sex roles to gender structure. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 733–755. doi:10.1177/0011392113479315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. D., & Sonnert, G. (2010). The costs and benefits of ‘red tape’: Anti-bureaucratic structure and gender inequity in a science research organization. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 385–409. doi:10.1177/0306312710391494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2012). Managerialism rhetorics in Portuguese higher education. Minerva, 50, 511–532. doi:10.1007/s11024-012-9211-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Menéndez, L., Cruz-Castro, L., & Alva, K. (2013). Time to tenure in Spanish universities: An event history analysis. PloS ONE, 8(10), 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446. doi:10.1023/A:1015575616285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1983). The organization of societal sectors. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 129–154). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, M. (1997). Meritocracy. In R. Edward & P. Werhan (Eds), Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of business ethics (pp. 413–414). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39. doi:10.2307/2392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN (2014). Human Development Report. (2014). Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Arensbergen, P., Van Der Weijden, I., & Van Den Besselaar, P. (2014). Different views on scholarly talent: What are the talents we are looking for in science? Research Evaluation, 23, 273–284. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of science: gender practices in the recruitment and selection of professors in the netherlands. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organisation, 19(4), 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349–12353. doi:10.1073/pnas.1510159112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Cupeiro, S., & Elston, M. A. (2006). Gender and academic career trajectories in Spain: From gendered passion to consecration in a sistema endogámico? Employee Relations, 28(6), 588–603. doi:10.1108/01425450610704515
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, N. (2017). Learning from informality? Rethinking the mismatch between formal policy strategies and informal tactics of citizenship. Current Sociology, 65(2), 167–181. doi:10.1177/0011392116657287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387(6631), 341–343. doi:10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. (2014). Keeping women in science. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. (2005). Crimes against logic. London: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffram, A., Aye, M., Apostolov, G., Andovona, S., O'Hagan, C., O'Connor, P., Chizzola, V., Çağlayan, H., Sağlamer, G., Tan, M.G. (2015). Perceptions of excellence in hiring processes. Retrieved from www.festa-europa.eu
   Google Scholar