3,376
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A colonial history of the higher education present: rethinking land-grant institutions through processes of accumulation and relations of conquest

ORCID Icon
Pages 212-228 | Received 29 Jun 2017, Accepted 22 Nov 2017, Published online: 02 Dec 2017

References

  • Adamson, M. (2009). The financialization of student life: Five propositions on student debt. Polygraph, 21, 97–110.
  • Ahenakew, C., Andreotti, V., Cooper, G., & Hireme, H. (2014). Beyond epistemic provincialism: De-provincializing Indigenous resistance. AlterNative: an International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(3), 216. doi:10.1177/117718011401000302
  • American Indian Higher Education Consortium. (2014, April 3). Statement of the AIHEC to the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations.
  • Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 4(1), 21–40.
  • Arvin, M., Tuck, E., & Morrill, A. (2013). Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 8–34. doi:10.1353/ff.2013.0006
  • Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. (2012). The land-grant tradition. Washington, DC.
  • Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. (2013). Land-grant but unequal. Washington, DC.
  • Barker, J. (2015). The corporation and the tribe. The American Indian Quarterly, 39(3), 243–270. doi:10.5250/amerindiquar.39.3.0243
  • Barker, J. (2016). The new Indian removal. Tequila Sovereign. Retrieved from https://tequilasovereign.wordpress.com/2016/05/31/the-new-indian-removal/
  • Barrow, C. W. (1990). Universities and the capitalist state: Corporate liberalism and the reconstruction of American higher education, 1894–1928. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Haymarket Books.
  • Brown, D. M. (2003). Hegemony and the discourse of the land grant movement: Historicizing as a point of departure. JAC, 23(2), 319–349.
  • Byrd, J. A. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Chakravartty, P., & Silva, D. F. D. (2012). Accumulation, dispossession, and debt: The racial logic of global capitalism – An introduction. American Quarterly, 64(3), 361–385. doi:10.1353/aq.2012.0033
  • Chaput, C. (2004). Democracy, capitalism, and the ambivalence of Willa Cather’s frontier rhetorics: Uncertain foundations of the US public university system. College English, 66(3), 310–334. doi:10.2307/4140751
  • Cottom, T. M. (2017). Lower Ed: The troubling rise of for-profit colleges in the new economy. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cross, C. F. (2012). Democracy, the West, and land-grant colleges. In D. M. Fogel & E. Malson-Huddle (Eds.), Precipice or crossroads? Where America’s great public universities stand and where they are going midway through their second century (pp. 1–15). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Crow, M. M & Dabars, W.B. (2012). University-based r&d and economic development: the morrill act and the emergence of the american research university. In D. M. Fogel, D. Mark, & E. Malson-Huddle (Eds.), Precipice or Crossroads? Where America’s great public universities stand and where they are going midway through their second century (pp. 119–158). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Dahl, A. J. (2014). Empire of the people: The ideology of democratic empire in the antebellum United States. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  • Deloria, V. (1996). Reserving to themselves: Treaties and the powers of Indian tribes. Arizona Law Review, 38, 963–980.
  • Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An Indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Eddy, E., Jr. (1957). Colleges for our land and time: The land-grant idea in American education. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
  • Ferguson, R. A. (2012). The reorder of things: the university and its pedagogies of minority difference. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Frymer, P. (2014). “A rush and a push and the land is ours”: Territorial expansion, land policy, and US state formation. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 119. doi:10.1017/S1537592713003745
  • Gates, P. W. (1976). An overview of American land policy. Agricultural History, 50(1), 213–229.
  • Geiger, R. L. (2014). The history of American higher education: Learning and culture from the founding to World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gelber, S. (2013). The populist vision for land grant universities, 1880–1900. In R. L. Geiger & N. M. Sorber (Eds.), The land-grant colleges and the reshaping of American higher education (pp. 165–194). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Goldrick-Rab, S., Kelchen, R., & Houle, J. (2014). The color of student debt: Implications of federal loan program reforms for Black students and Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Madison: Wisconsin HOPE Lab.
  • Goodchild, L.F., & Wrobel, D. M. (2014). Western college expansion: churches and evangelization, states and boosterism, 1818–1945. In L. F. Goodchild, R. Jonsen, P. Limerick, & D. Longanecker (Eds), Higher education in the american west: regional history and state contexts (pp. pp. 3–37). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Harris, C. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. doi:10.2307/1341787
  • Hartman, S. (2008). Lose you mother: a journey along the atlantic slave route. New York NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, E. L. (1981). Misconceptions about the early land-grant colleges. Journal of Higher Education, 52(4), 333–351. doi:10.1080/00221546.1981.11780153
  • Kelley, R. D. G. (2017). The rest of us: Rethinking settler and native. American Quarterly, 69(2), 267–276. doi:10.1353/aq.2017.0020
  • Key, S. (1996). Economics or education: The establishment of American land-grant universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 196–220. doi:10.1080/00221546.1996.11780256
  • King, T. L. (2016). New world grammars: The ‘unthought’ Black discourses of conquest. Theory & Event, 19, 4.
  • Kish, Z., & Leroy, J. (2015). Bonded life: Technologies of racial finance from slave insurance to philanthrocapital. Cultural Studies, 29(5/6), 630–651. doi:10.1080/09502386.2015.1017137
  • Kujovich, G. (1993). Public Black colleges: The long history of unequal funding. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, (2), 73–82. doi:10.2307/2962573
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24. doi:10.1080/095183998236863
  • Leonardo, Z. (2013). The story of schooling: Critical race theory and the educational racial contract. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(4), 599–610.
  • Lloyd, D., & Wolfe, P. (2016). Settler colonial logics and the neoliberal regime. Settler Colonial Studies, 6, 109–118. doi:10.1080/2201473X.2015.1035361
  • Mahmud, T. (2012). Debt and discipline. American Quarterly, 64(3), 469–494.
  • Melamed, J. (2015). Racial capitalism. Critical Ethnic Studies, 1(1), 76–85. doi:10.5749/jcritethnstud.1.1.0076
  • Miller, R. J. (2005). The doctrine of discovery in American Indian law. Idaho Law Review, 42, 1.
  • Miller, R. J. (2011). American indians, the doctrine of discovery, and manifest destiny. Wyoming Law Review, 11(2), 329–349.
  • National Research Council. (1995). Colleges of agriculture at the land grant universities: A profile. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Nelson, A. R. (2013). Institutionalizing agricultural research in the early american republic: an international perspective. In (Eds.), The land-grant colleges and the reshaping of american higher education (pp. 13-39). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Nevins, A. (1962). The state universities and democracy. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  • Nichols, R. (2017). Theft is property! The recursive logic of dispossession. Political Theory. doi:10.1177/0090591717701709
  • Patel, L. (2015). Desiring diversity and backlash: White property rights in higher education. The Urban Review, 47(4), 657–675. doi:10.1007/s11256-015-0328-7
  • Patton, L. D. (2016). Disrupting postsecondary prose: Toward a critical race theory of higher education. Urban Education, 51(3), 315–342. doi:10.1177/0042085915602542
  • Peck, J. (2004). Geography and public policy: constructions of neoliberalism. Progress In Human Geography, 28(3), 392–405.
  • Pounds, D. (2017, February 2). Land grant hunt is on. Check the map. Inside Iowa State. Retrieved from http://www.inside.iastate.edu/article/2017/02/02/landgrant
  • Rifkin, M. (2013). Settler common sense. Settler Colonial Studies, 3(3–4), 322–340. doi:10.1080/2201473X.2013.810702
  • Robinson, C. J. (1983). Black Marxism: The making of the black radical tradition. London: Zed Press.
  • Ross, E. D. (1942). Democracy’s college: The land-grant movement in the formative stage. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press.
  • Seamster, L., & Charron-Chénier, R. (2017). Predatory inclusion and education debt: Rethinking the racial wealth gap. Social Currents, 4, 199–207. doi:10.1177/2329496516686620
  • Silva, D. F. D. (2007). Toward a global idea of race. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Simpson, L. (2011). Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg, MB: Arbeiter Ring Publisher.
  • Soederberg, S. (2014). Student loans, debtfare and the commodification of debt: The politics of securitization and the displacement of risk. Critical Sociology, 40(5), 689–709. doi:10.1177/0896920513513964
  • Sorber, N. M. (2011). Farmers, scientists, and officers of industry: The formation and reformation of land-grant colleges in the northeastern United States, 1862–1906. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
  • Sorber, N. M., & Geiger, R. L. (2014). The welding of opposite views: Land-grant historiography at 150 years. In M.B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 385–422). Springer Netherlands.
  • Stein, S., Hunt, D., Suša, R., & Andreotti, V. (2017). The educational challenge of unraveling the fantasies of ontological security. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 11, 69–79. doi:10.1080/15595692.2017.1291501
  • Te Wharepora Hou. (2016). University continues to benefit from colonial land confiscations. Retrieved from https://tewhareporahou.wordpress.com/2016/08/31/university-continues-to-benefit-from-colonial-land-confiscations/
  • WeTheProtestors (2015, December). The demands. Retrieved from: http://www.thedemands.org
  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Turner, F. J. (1910). Commencement address: Pioneer ideals and the state university. Indiana Unvierstiy Bulletin, 8(6), 6–29.
  • Turner, F. J. (1920). The frontier in history. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
  • van der Zwan, N. (2014). Making sense of financialization. Socio-economic Review, 12(1), 99-129.
  • Vimalassery, M., Pegues, J. H., & Goldstein, A. (2016). Introduction: On colonial unknowing. Theory & Event, 19, 4.
  • Wilder, C. S. (2013). Ebony and ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Williams, R. L. (1991). The origins of federal support for higher education: George W. Atherton and the land-grant college movement. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409. doi:10.1080/14623520601056240
  • Wolfe, P. (2012). Against the intentional fallacy: Legocentrism and continuity in the rhetoric of Indian dispossession. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 36(1), 3–45. doi:10.17953/aicr.36.1.d35pr5h374lq8p21

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.