Who’s being ‘sheltered?’: How monolingual language ideologies are produced within education policy discourse and sheltered English immersion

References

• Allan, E. J. (2008). Policy discourses, gender, and education: Constructing women’s status (Vol. 11). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, M. B., & Faltis, C. J. (Eds.). (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., Goldenberg, C., & Rueda, R. (2010). Restrictive state language policies: Are they scientifically based? In P. Gándara & M. Hopkins (Eds.), Forbidden language (pp. 139–158). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C. K. (2018). It’s not really my job: A mixed methods framework for language ideologies, monolingualism, and teaching emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118783188
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. A., & de Kanter, A. A. (1983). An answer from research on bilingual education. American Education, 19(6), 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bansel, P. (2015). The subject of policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang-Bacon, C. K. (2020). Monolingual language ideologies and the Massachusetts Sheltered English Immersion (SEI) endorsement initiative: A critical policy analysis. Educational Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820901465
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (1994). Productive, relational and everywhere? Conceptualising power and resistance within Foucauldian feminism. Sociology, 28(2), 435–454.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2014). Rethinking pedagogical assumptions in Canadian French immersion programs. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarría, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2016). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, H., Wesche, M., Krashen, S., Clement, R., & Kruidenier, B. (1984). Second-language acquisition through subject-matter learning: A study of sheltered psychology classes at the University of Ottawa. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41(2), 268–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2014). Language ideologies of Arizona voters, language managers, and teachers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(1), 34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formosinho, M., Jesus, P., & Reis, C. (2019). Emancipatory and critical language education: A plea for translingual possible selves and worlds. Critical Studies in Education, 60(2), 168–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1971–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzen, A. (2011). Teaching as sheltering: A metaphorical analysis of sheltered instruction for English language learners. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 185–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, O., Flores, N., & Spotti, N., (Eds.). (2017). The oxford handbook of language and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs and practices for English learners (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Wei, L. (2013). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2009). Critical perspectives on race and schooling. In J. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 173–185). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gramling, D. (2016). The invention of monolingualism. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, M. (2017). Rethinking equity: Preservice teachers’ perceptions and practice around policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(4), 466–485.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, K. A. (2016). Call it what it is: Monolingual education in US schools. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(1), 20–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., Stephens, C., Nelson, J. J., & Johnson, E. J. (2018). Violating Lau: Sheltered English instruction programs and equal educational opportunity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(4), 488–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettle, M. (2005). Critical discourse analysis and hybrid texts: Analysing English as a second language (ESL). Critical Studies in Education, 46(2), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Koslowski, M. (2018). Poststructuralism, linguistic imperialism, and the English-only question. In P. P. Trifonas & S. Jagger (Eds.), Handbook of cultural studies and education (pp. 190–201). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1991). Sheltered subject matter teaching. Cross Currents, 18(2), 183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. (2014). A cerebration of language diversity, language policy, and politics in education. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 312–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2006). Disinventing and (re) constituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2(3), 137–156.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). (2014). Massachusetts sheltered English instruction teacher endorsement course, Facilitators manual. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/retell/teacher-syllabus.docx
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). (2019). Advancing, extending, or renewing a license. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/licensure/advance-extend-renew-license.html
   Google Scholar
• May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2014). Ethnography and language policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, T. L., & May, S. (Eds.). (2017). Language policy and political issues in education. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McField, G. P. (Ed.). (2014). The Miseducation of English learners: A tale of three states and lessons to be learned. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, G. S. (2017). The multilingual turn as a critical movement in education: Assumptions, challenges and a need for reflection. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 131–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language education policies: Educators as policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. S. Y. (2008). Two processes of reproducing monolingualism in South Korea. Sociolinguistic Studies, 2(3), 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2017). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Proposition 203, Arizona. (2000). English language education for children in public schools. (Subsequently Arizona education code section 3, Title 15, Chapter 7, Article 3.1). Retrieved from http://apps.azsos.gov/election/2000/Info/pubpamphlet/english/prop203.htm
   Google Scholar
• Proposition 227, California. (1997). English language in public schools. (Subsequently California Education Code 300–340). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20100618094226/http://primary98.sos.ca.gov/VoterGuide/Propositions/227text.htm
   Google Scholar
• Question 2, Massachusetts. (2002). English language education in public schools. (Amended Massachusetts Education Chapter 71A and enacted Chapter 386of the Acts of 2002). Retrieved from http://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/elepdf/ifv02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ray-Subramanian, C. E. (2011). Structured English immersion. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development (p. 1454). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Razfar, A., & Rumenapp, J. C. (2012). Language ideologies in English learner classrooms: Critical reflections and the role of explicit awareness. Language Awareness, 21(4), 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2006). An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, J. D., & Burdick, C. (2017). Language Ideologies. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 103–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In D. Brenneis & R. S. Macaulay (Eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology (pp. 284–306). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education – Or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Windle, J. (2019). Exploring the positioning of teacher expertise in TESOL‐ Related curriculum standards. TESOL Quarterly. Online advance publication. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tesq.527
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2005). History: Twenty- five years of progress in education children with disabilities through IDEA. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Special Education Programs. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/history.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). (2011, September 27). Massachusetts takes steps to require sheltered English immersion training in response to justice department’s letter. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/massachusetts-takes-steps-require-sheltered-english-immersion-training-response-justice.
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and postructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, T. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance? Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, W. E. (2019). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. E., & Choi, D. (2006). The impact of language and high-stakes testing policies on elementary school English language learners in Arizona. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, Y. (2012). Beyond the mother tongue: The postmonolingual condition. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar