Jokers’ pursuit of truth: critical policy analysis in the age of spectacle and post-truth politics

References

• Apple, M. W. (2013). Can education change society? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2019). On doing critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 33(1), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818807307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydarova, E. (2019a). Flipping the paradigm: Studying up and research for social justice. In K. Strunk & L. Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 33–43). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Aydarova, E. (2019b). Teacher education reform as political theater: Russian policy dramas. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aydarova, E. (forthcoming). Knowledge for the elites, competencies for the masses: Political theatre of educational reforms in the Russian Federation. Comparative Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydarova, O. (2015). Glories of the Soviet past or dim visions of the future: Russian teacher education as the site of historical becoming. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 46(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
   Google Scholar
• Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Political interviews and the politics of interviewing. In G. Walford (Ed.), Researching the powerful in education (pp. 108–127). University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, A. (1979). Theater of the oppressed. Urizen Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, A. (2017). Power in elite interviewing: Lessons from feminist studies for political science. Women’s Studies International Forum, 62, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). For a scholarship with commitment. Profession, 40–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25595701
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2003). Firing back: Against the tyranny of the market. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, K. (2019). Unpacking post-truth. Critical Policy Studies, 13(4), 432–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1673200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L. (2003). Interviewing, power/ knowledge,and social inequality. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Postmodern interviewing (pp. 242–255). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2013). Cultural struggles: Performance, ethnography, praxis. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1994). Society of the spectacle. Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, B. (2003). Researcher or trickster? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 725. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000143020
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K. (2002). Getting beyond the “official line”: Reflections on dilemmas of access, knowledge and power in researching policy networks. Journal of Social Policy, 31(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279402006505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2007). Policy analysis in critical perspective: The epistemics of discursive practices. Critical Policy Studies, 1(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518510
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, J., Halpin, D., & Power, S. (1994). Brief encounters: Researching education policy making in elite settings. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Tear off the masks! Identity and imposture in twentieth-century Russia. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Graveline, F. J. (2000). Circle as methodology: Enacting an aboriginal paradigm. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183900413304
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). Ecce homo, ain’t (ar’n’t) I a woman, and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 104–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., & Imber, J. B. (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (1995). Local knowledge and local power: Notes on the ethnography of local community elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 151–170). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2003). Transformational elite interviews: Principles and problems. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403009003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolshus, T. (2017). The power of ethnography in the public sphere. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1997). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237124
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (2000). Putting danger in the frame. In G. Lee-Treweek & S. Linkogle (Eds.), Danger in the field: Ethics and risk in social research (pp. 8–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Z. S. (2009). The truth about interviewing elites. Politics, 29(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nader, L. (1999). CA comment on Pels 1999a. Current Anthropology, 40(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1086/200001
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrander, S. A. (1995). ’Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful:’ Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 133–150). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2019). Problematising policy: The development of (critical) policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1697718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pels, P. (1999). Professions of duplexity: A prehistory of ethical codes in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 40(2), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/200001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privalov, A. (2014). Ob ocherednoy vnezapnoy reforme [About another sudden reform]. Ekspert, January 20. https://expert.ru/expert/2014/04/ob-ocherednoj-vnezapnoj-reforme/
   Google Scholar
• Quantz, R. A., & O’Connor, T. W. (1988). Writing critical ethnography: Dialogue, multivoicedness, and carnival in cultural texts. Educational Theory, 38(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1988.00095.x
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. A. (2013). Indigenous knowledge and the machinist metaphors of the bricoleur researcher. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(7), 780–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.666290
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., Wright, S., & Però, D. (2011). Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., Miller-Kahn, L., Heinecke, W., & Jarvis, P. F. (2004). Political spectacle and the fate of American schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180102
   Google Scholar
• Thuesen, F. (2011). Navigating between dialogue and confrontation: Phronesis and emotions in interviewing elites on ethnic discrimination. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(7), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411413998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (1994). Researching the powerful in education. University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (2012). Researching the powerful in education: A re-assessment of the problems. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.669523
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R. (2008). Shadow elite: How the world’s new power brokers undermine democracy, government, and the free market. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar