1,105
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Normalizing race in (gifted) education: genomics and spaces of White exceptionalism

ORCID Icon
Pages 67-83 | Received 09 Dec 2020, Accepted 23 Aug 2021, Published online: 07 Oct 2021

References

  • 8VAC20: Regulations Governing Educational Services for Gifted Students. (1995). 8VAC20-40.
  • Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2013). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Asbury, K., & Wai, J. (2019). Viewing education policy through a genetic lens. Journal of School Choice, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2019.1705008
  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078662
  • Beckmann, E., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(504). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504
  • Bernasconi, R. (2010). The policing of race mixing: The place of biopower within the history of racisms. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9224-8
  • Binet, A. (1913). A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children (2nd ed.). Chicago medical book co.
  • Bliss, C. (2018). Social by nature: The promise and peril of sociogenomics. Stanford University Press.
  • Brody, L. (2018, October 3). Some parents pay up to $400 an hour to Prep 4-Year-Olds for NYC’s gifted test. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/some-parents-pay-up-to-400-an-hour-to-prep-4-year-olds-for-nycs-gifted-test-1538568001
  • Buck v. Bell. (1927). US Supreme Court. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/274/200
  • Card, D., & Giuliano, L. (2015). Can universal screening increase the representation of low income and minority students in gifted education? (Working Paper No. 21519). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21519
  • Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415580430
  • Chang, C. C., Hsu, S. D., Lee, J. J., Tellier, L. C., Yang, R., & Zhao, B. (2013). BGI Cognitive Genomics Lab: Proposal for gene-trait association study of g. https://www.cog-genomics.org/static/pdf/bgi_g_proposal.pdf
  • Chen, H., Gu, X., Zhou, Y., Ge, Z., Wang, B., Siok, W. T., Wang, G., Huen, M., Jiang, Y., Tan, L.-H., & Sun, Y. (2017). A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants associated with mathematics ability. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 40365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40365
  • Cherng, S. H.-Y. (2017). If they think I can: Teacher bias and youth of color expectations and achievement. Social Science Research, 66(2017), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.04.001
  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2018). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: An intergenerational perspective. (Working Paper No. 24441). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24441
  • Conley, D., & Fletcher, J. (2017). The genome factor. Princeton University Press.
  • Dennis, R. M. (1995). Social darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race. The Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967206
  • Donovan, B. M., Weindling, M., Salazar, B., Duncan, A., Stuhlsatz, M., & Keck, P. (2020). Genomics literacy matters: Supporting the development of genomics literacy through genetics education could reduce the prevalence of genetic essentialism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21670
  • Dreger, R. M., & Miller, K. S. (1960). Comparative psychological studies of Negroes and Whites in the United States. Psychological Bulletin, 57(5), 361–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047639
  • Dynarski, S. (2016, April 8). Why talented Black and Hispanic students can go undiscovered. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/upshot/why-talented-black-and-hispanic-students-can-go-undiscovered.html
  • Erwin, J. O., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428197
  • Evrie, J. H. V. (1868). Negroes and Negro slavery: The first an inferior race: The latter its normal condition.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Intelligence: A new look. Transaction Publishers.
  • Fiel, J. E., & Zhang, Y. (2019). With all deliberate speed: The reversal of court-ordered school desegregation, 1970–2013. American Journal of Sociology, 124(6), 1685–1719. https://doi.org/10.1086/703044
  • Fish, R. E. (2017). The racialized construction of exceptionality: Experimental evidence of race/ethnicity effects on teachers’ interventions. Social Science Research, 62(2017), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.007
  • Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Harris, J. J., III. (1997). The recruitment and retention of minority teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 19(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553832
  • Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., III, Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2001). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554129
  • Ford, D. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.919563
  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College De France, 1977-78. Springer.
  • Fullwiley, D. (2004). Discriminate biopower and everyday biopolitics: Views on sickle cell testing in Dakar. Medical Anthropology, 23(2), 157–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740490448939
  • Gentry, M., Gray, A., Whiting, G. W., Maeda, Y., & Pereira, N. (2019). Gifted education in the United States: Law, access, equity, and missingness across the country by locale, Title I school status, and race. Purdue University.
  • Gidziela, A., Rimfeld, K., Malanchini, M., Allegrini, A. G., McMillan, A., Selzam, S., Ronald, A., Viding, E., von Stumm, S., Eley, T. C., & Plomin, R. (2021). Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood. MedRxiv. 5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251308
  • Gillborn, D., Rollock, N., Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2012). ‘You got a pass, so what more do you want?’: Race, class and gender intersections in the educational experiences of the Black middle class. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.638869
  • Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2001). The new IQism: Intelligence, ‘Ability’ and the rationing of education. In J. Demaine (Ed.), Sociology of education today (pp. 65–99). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977507_5
  • Gillborn, D. (2016). Softly, softly: Genetics, intelligence and the hidden racism of the new geneism. Journal of Education Policy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1139189
  • Goldring, E. B., & Phillips, K. J. R. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public–private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930801987844
  • Goldring, R., Gray, L., & Bitterman, A. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011-12 schools and staffing survey. First Look. NCES 2013-314. National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Griffin, D. (2014). Public or private schools, tests and league tables, parental choice and competition in Australia, the USA and Britain. In Griffin, D. (Eds.), Education reform: The unwinding of intelligence and creativity (pp. 153–174). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01994-9_9
  • Griffiths, S. (2019, July 14). Genetic study aims to help poor, bright children succeed. The Sunday Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/genetic-study-aims-to-help-poor-bright-children-succeed-bjfmq58v3
  • Grissom, J. A., & Redding, C. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 233285841562217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
  • Hansen, E. T., Gluck, S., & Shelton, A. L. (2015). Obligations and concerns of an organization like the center for talented youth. Hastings Center Report, 45(S1), S66–S72. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.502
  • Harden, K. P. (2018, July 24). Opinion | Why progressives should embrace the genetics of education. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/opinion/dna-nature-genetics-education.html
  • Harden, K. P., & Koellinger, P. D. (2020). Using genetics for social science. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0862-5
  • Harden, K. P. (2021a). “Reports of my death were greatly exaggerated”: Behavior genetics in the postgenomic era. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), annurev-psych-052220-103822. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-052220-103822
  • Hart, S. A. (2016). Precision education initiative: Moving towards personalized education. Mind, Brain and Education : The Official Journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 10(4), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12109
  • Heine, S. J., Dar-Nimrod, I., Cheung, B. Y., & Proulx, T. (2017). Essentially biased: Why people are fatalistic about genes. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 137–192). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.003
  • Hunt-Grubbe, C. (2007). The elementary DNA of Dr. Watson. The Sunday Times. 14. http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/file/cogem/cogem_t49203c8e_001.pdf
  • Jensen, A. R. (1968). Social class, race, and genetics: implications for education. American Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312005001001
  • Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement. Harvard Educational Review, 39(1), 1–123. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7
  • Jensen, A. R. (1991). Spearman’s “g” and the problem of educational equality. Oxford Review of Education, 17(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498910170205
  • Kahn, J., Nelson, A., Graves, J. L. J., Abel, S., Benjamin, R., Blacker, S., Bliss, C., Braun, L., Bridges, K. M., Calhoun, C., Rapp, R., & Roberts, D. (2018, March 30). Opinion: How not to talk about race and genetics. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/bfopinion/race-genetics-david-reich
  • Kovas, Y., Tikhomirova, T., Selita, F., Tosto, M. G., & Malykh, S. (2016). How genetics can help education. In Y. Kovas, S. Malykh, & D. Gaysina (Eds.), Behavioural genetics for education (pp. 1–23)). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437327_1
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
  • Lazzarato, M. (2002). From biopower to biopolitics. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 13(2002), 112–125. https://plijournal.com/volumes/13/
  • Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., Bowers, P., Sidorenko, J., Linnér, R. K., Fontana, M. A., Kundu, T., Lee, C., Li, H., Li, R., Royer, R., Timshel, P. N., Walters, R. K., Willoughby, E. A., Alver, M., … Cesarini, D. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50(8), 1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3 1
  • Lemke, T., Casper, M., & Moore, L. J. (2011). Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. NYU Press.
  • Lewis, A. E., & Diamond, J. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
  • Luciano, M., Evans, D. M., Hansell, N. K., Medland, S. E., Montgomery, G. W., Martin, N. G., Wright, M. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). A genome-wide association study for reading and language abilities in two population cohorts. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 12(6), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12053
  • Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., Allegrini, A., Ritchie, S. J., & Plomin, R. (2020). Cognitive ability and education: How behavioural genetic research has advanced our knowledge and understanding of their association. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 111(2020), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.016
  • Martens, F. K., Tonk, E. C. M., & Janssens, A. C. J. W. (2019). Evaluation of polygenic risk models using multiple performance measures: A critical assessment of discordant results. Genetics in Medicine, 21(2), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0058-9
  • Martschenko, D., Trejo, S., & Domingue, B. W. (2019). Genetics and education: Recent developments in the context of an ugly history and an uncertain future. AERA Open, 5(1), 233285841881051. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418810516
  • Martschenko, D. (2019). DNA dreams’: Teacher perspectives on the role and relevance of genetics for education. Research in Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523719869956
  • Martschenko, D. (2020). Embodying biopolitically discriminate borders: Teachers’ spatializations of race. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1813089
  • McWhorter, L. (2004). Sex, race, and biopower: A Foucauldian genealogy. Hypatia, 19(3), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01301.x
  • Morris, T. T., Davies, N. M., & Davey Smith, G. (2020). Can education be personalised using pupils’ genetic data? ELife, 9(2020), e49962. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49962
  • Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700206
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2014). Turning a blind eye: Neglecting the needs of the gifted and talented through limited accountability, oversight, and reporting (State of the Nation).
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2017a). Advocate for gifted children. https://www.nagc.org/get-involved/advocate-gifted-children
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2017b). Definitions of giftedness | National Association for Gifted Children. National Association for Gifted Children. https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/definitions-giftedness
  • Newman, T. M. (2008). Assessment of giftedness in school-age children using measures of intelligence or cognitive abilities. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 161–176). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_9
  • Owens, A. (2018). Income segregation between school districts and inequality in students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717741180
  • Panofsky, A. L. (2009). Behavior genetics and the prospect of “personalized social policy.”. Policy and Society, 28(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.09.006
  • Panofsky, A. (2015). What does behavioral genetics offer for improving education? Hastings Center Report, 45(S1), S43–S49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.498
  • Panofsky, A. (2018). Rethinking scientific authority: Behavior genetics and race controversies. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 6(2), 322–358. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0032-z
  • Parens, E. (2020). Social genomics can combat inequality or be used to justify it. Aeon Magazine. https://aeon.co/essays/social-genomics-can-combat-inequality-or-be-used-to-justify-it
  • Pearson, T. A., & Manolio, T. A. (2008). How to Interpret a Genome-wide Association Study. JAMA, 299(11), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.11.1335
  • Peters, S. J., Gentry, M., Whiting, G. W., & McBee, M. T. (2019). Who Gets Served in Gifted Education? Demographic Representation and a Call for Action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
  • Peterson, E. R., Rubie-Davies, C., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. (2016). Teachers’ explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap. Learning and Instruction, 42(2016), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.010
  • Popejoy, A. B., Crooks, K. R., Fullerton, S. M., Hindorff, L. A., Hooker, G. W., Koenig, B. A., Pino, N., Ramos, E. M., Ritter, D. I., Wand, H., Wright, M. W., Yudell, M., Zou, J. Y., Plon, S. E., Bustamante, C. D., & Ormond, K. E., & Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Ancestry and Diversity Working Group. (2020). Clinical genetics lacks standard definitions and protocols for the collection and use of diversity measures. American Journal of Human Genetics, 107(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.005
  • Popejoy, A. B., & Fullerton, S. M. (2016). Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature News, 538(7624), 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/538161a
  • Porter, J. W. (2017). A “precious minority”: Constructing the “gifted” and “academically talented” student in the era of Brown v. Board of Education and the National Defense Education Act. ISIS, 108(3), 581–605. https://doi.org/10.1086/694446
  • Raffington, L., Mallard, T., & Harden, K. P. (2020). Polygenic scores in developmental psychology: Invite genetics in, leave biodeterminism behind. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2(1), null. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051820-123945
  • Raman, S., & Tutton, R. (2009). Life, science, and biopower. Science, Technology & Human Values, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345838
  • Redding, C., & Grissom, J. A. (2021). Do students in gifted programs perform better? Linking gifted program participants to achievement and nonachievement outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(3), 520–544. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211008919
  • Regalado, A. (2019, February 11). More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/11/103446/more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/
  • Reich, D. (2018, March). How genetics is changing our understanding of ‘Race’. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html
  • Richardson, K. (2002). What IQ Tests Test. Theory & Psychology, 12(3), 283–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012003012
  • Ritchie, S. (2016, September 13). We’re finally starting to understand the “genetics of success”. Business Insider. http://uk.businessinsider.com/were-finally-starting-to-understand-the-genetics-of-success-2016-9
  • Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty (6th ed.). Pantheon Books.
  • Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
  • Rose, N. (2013). The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412456569
  • Sabatello, M. (2018). A genomically informed education system? Challenges for behavioral genetics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766027
  • Shero, J., van Dijk, W., Edwards, A., Schatschneider, C., Solari, E., & Hart, S. (2021). The practical utility of genetic screening in school settings. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00090-y
  • Shockley, W. (1971). Negro IQ deficit: Failure of a “malicious coincidence” model warrants new research proposals. Review of Educational Research, 41(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543041003227
  • Shockley, W. (1972). Dysgenics, geneticity, raceology: A challenge to the intellectual responsibility of educators. The Phi Delta Kappan, 53(5), 297–307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20373194
  • Stark, L. (2014). Naming giftedness: Whiteness and ability discourse in US schools. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.983758
  • Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Toom, V. (2012). Bodies of science and law: Forensic DNA profiling, biological bodies, and biopower. Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00575.x
  • Wade, N. (2014). A troublesome inheritance: Genes, race and human history (Second printing edition). Penguin Press.
  • Wilby, P. (2014, February 18). Psychologist on a mission to give every child a learning chip. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/feb/18/psychologist-robert-plomin-says-genes-crucial-education
  • Yong, E. (2016, May 11). The genetics of staying in school. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/05/the-genetics-of-staying-in-school/482052/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.