Good teachers and counter conduct

References

• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2012). Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/australian-teacher-performance-and-development-framework.pdf?sfvrsn=4a7fff3c_6
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2018). National Professional Standards for Teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, Power, and Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013). The Beautiful Risk of Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. (2007). The Ethical Teacher. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, M., & Talbot, D. (2020). The Corporatisation of Education: Bureaucracy, Boredom, and Transformative Possibilities. New Formations: a Journal of culture/theory/politics, 100–101, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF:100-101.03.2020
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2009). The Ethico‐politics of Teacher Identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Moore, A. (2013). Professional standards, teacher identities and an ethics of singularity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.819070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck, J., & Daliri-Ngametua, R. (2021). How to recognise an attack of the zombie (data). EduResearch Matters. Australian Association for Research in Education. https://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?p=11244
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. I. (2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2011). The ‘shape’ of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.607231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., Stacey, M., Wilson, R., & Gavin, M. (2019). Intensification of teachers’ work under devolution: A ‘tsunami’of paperwork. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(5), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618801396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality Vol. 1. Random House. An Introduction.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). On the Genealogy of Ethics. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 229–252). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1996). What is Critique? In J. Schmidt (Ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (pp. 382–398). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. G. Burchell, Trans. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. G. Burchell, Trans. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2020). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Essential Works 1954-84 (pp. 281–301). Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Blasius, M. (1993). About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591793021002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2012). On the Right and the Duty to Change the World. In M. Nikolakaki (Ed.), Critical Pedagogy in the New Dark Ages: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 45–52). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R. (2011). The Garnaut Review 2011: Australia in the Global Response to Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2015). The Utopia of Rules. Melville House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600975593
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2018). Questioning the Language of Improvement and Reform in Education: Reclaiming Meaning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., & Clarke, M. (2016). ‘Cruel optimism’: Teacher attachment to professionalism in an era of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1160293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. (2013). Foucault, counter-conduct and school leadership as a form of political subjectivity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.768968
   Google Scholar
• Odysseos, L., Death, C., & Malmvig, H. (2016). Interrogating Michel Foucault’s Counter-Conduct: Theorising the Subjects and Practices of Resistance in Global Politics. Global Society, 30(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1144568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1309072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossdale, C., & Stierl, M. (2016). Everything Is Dangerous: Conduct and Counter-Conduct in the Occupy Movement. Global Society, 30(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1133569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2011). Good teaching in difficult times: Demoralization in the pursuit of good work. American Journal of Education, 118(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/662010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2015a). “I Was Becoming Increasingly Uneasy About the Profession and What Was Being Asked of Me”: Preserving Integrity in Teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(5), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2015b). Philosophizing about teacher dissatisfaction: A multidisciplinary hermeneutic approach. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9409-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2016). “We’re Not Going to Do That Because It’s Not Right”: Using Pedagogical Responsibility to Reframe the Doublespeak of Fidelity. Educational Theory, 66(1–2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns (2nd) ed. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, N. (2021). Data Culture and the Organisation of Teachers’ Work: An Institutional Ethnography. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, D. (2016). Evidence for no-one: Standards, accreditation, and transformed teaching work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, D. (2020). Institutional Ethnography and the Materiality of Affect: Affective Circuits as Indicators of Other Possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(5), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620943276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2017a). Affect and counter-conduct: Cultivating action for social change in human rights education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1300573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2017b). Counter conducts as affective practices in the classroom: The task of pedagogies of affirmative estrangement. Teaching Education, 29(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1362551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2019). The affective dimension of everyday resistance: Implications for critical pedagogy in engaging with neoliberalism’s educational impact. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1617180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2020). Affirmative critique as a practice of responding to the impasse between post-truth and negative critique: Pedagogical implications for schools. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1723666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2008). The Ticklish Subject. Verso.
   Google Scholar