The moral positioning of education policy publics: how social media is used to wedge an issue

References

• Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2014). Comparative education, the ‘New Paradigm’ and policy borrowing: Constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.826497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing Neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2021). Response: policy? Policy research? How absurd? Critical Studies in Education, 62(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.1924214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, N. (2021a). Parents, carers, and policy labor: Policy networks and new media. New Media & Society, 1461444820979004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820979004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, N. (2021b). The social life of literacy education: How the 2018 #phonicsdebate is reshaping the field. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00451-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccia Artieri, G., & Gemini, L. (2019). Mass media and the web in the light of Luhmann’s media system. Current Sociology, 67(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119837542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. //purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text, University of Oxford]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:178db677-fa8b-491d-beda-4bacdc9d7069
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. (2012). Speaking truth to power: The paradox of the intellectual in the visual information age. In S. Brooks, D. Stasiak, & T. Zyro (Eds.), Policy expertise in contemporary democracies (pp. 69–85). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315601120
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J. (2010, May 1). Students are bound to be the biggest losers. The Centre for Independent Studies. https://www.cis.org.au/commentary/opinion/students-are-bound-to-be-the-biggest-losers/
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1997). Nationalism and the public sphere Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar . In Public and private in thought and practice. (pp. 75–102). University of Chicago Books. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3643426.html
   Google Scholar
• CIS. (nd.). Mission & History. The Centre for Independent Studies. https://www.cis.org.au/about/mission/
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change (Revised) ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cruz Paragas, F., & Lin, T. T. (2016). Organizing and reframing technological determinism. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1528–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (1998). British think-tanks and the climate of opinion (1st) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1997). The public sphere. In R. E. Goodin & P. Pettit (Eds.), Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social Media and the ‘Spiral of Silence’.143-146 https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., & Boyle, C. (2011). My school? Critiquing the abstraction and quantification of Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattam, R., Prosser, B., & Brady, K. (2009). Revolution or backlash? The mediatisation of education policy in Australia. Critical Studies in Education, 50(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480902859433
   Google Scholar
• IPA. (2020). Education and Skills Archives. https://ipa.org.au/research-areas/education-and-skills
   Google Scholar
• Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, V. C., & Schmitt, O. (2021). Ideology and influence in the debate over Russian election interference. International Politics, 58(5), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00270-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2016). Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0193-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1993). The code of the moral. Cardozo Law Review, 14(3–4), 995–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2006). Risk: A sociological theory (1st) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of society. Vol. 1. Stanford University Press, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC..
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of society (volume 2) R. Barrett, Trans. Vol. 2. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology (1st) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, I. (2019). New right metapolitics and the algorithmic activism of Schild & Vrienden. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856700
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research (1st) ed.). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T. (2012a). Murky Power: “Think Tanks” as Boundary Organizations. D. Courpasson, D. Golsorkhi, & J. J. Sallaz(Eds.), Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets. Vol. Vol. 34, pp. 113–133. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000034007
   Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T. (2012b). Think Tanks in America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, P. (2003). Australian neoliberal think tanks and the backlash against the welfare state. The Journal of Australian Political Economy, 51(June), 29–56. <https://search-informit-com-au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=200307260;res=IELAPA>
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2013). Reporting the ‘education revolution’: MySchool.edu.au in the print media. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.698860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A. (2013). The future of higher education is not necessarily faster of cheaper. Policy, 29(2). https://www.cis.org.au/app/uploads/2015/04/images/stories/policy-magazine/2013-winter/29-2-13-andrew-norton.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V. (1992). Public opinion (Vol. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326061
   Google Scholar
• Roskam, J. (2003). What’s So special about universities? Review, June. https://ipa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/archive/Review55-2%20Whats%20so%20special%20about%20universities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2016). Think tanks, education and elite policy actors. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0185-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. (2009). Creativity and the experts: New labour, think tanks, and the policy process. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208328898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: the end of empire and the birth of Neoliberalism (1st) ed.). *Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Marden, P. (2008). Conservative think tanks and public politics. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140802488300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S. G., & Scott, J. (2017). The consequences of social pressures on partisan opinion dynamics. Eastern Economic Journal; Basingstoke, 43(2), 242–259. http://dx.doi.org.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/10.1057/eej.2016.6
   Google Scholar
• Tække, J. (2021). Systems-theoretical observations of moral media panic debates. Kybernetes. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchilingirian, J. (2021). Network intellectuals’ and ‘networked intellectuals’: Relational approaches to the study of British think tanks Donald E. Abelson and Christopher J. Rastrick . In Handbook on think tanks in public policy (pp. 2–15). Scopus.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., Savage, G. C., & Lingard, B. (2016). Introduction: Think tanks, edu-businesses and education policy: Issues of evidence, expertise and influence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0195-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (1997). Social theory and education policy: The legacy of Karl Mannheim. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569970180201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2021). Digital policy sociology: Software and science in data-intensive precision education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1691030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar