A fuzzy-MADM based approach for prioritising Six Sigma projects in the Indian auto sector

References

• Agalgaonkar, A., Kulkarni S., & Khaparde, S. A. (2005). Multi-attribute decision making approach for strategic planning of DGs. In Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2005. IEEE, (pp. 2985–2990). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Anvari, A., Zulkifli, N., & Arghish, O. (2014). Application of a modified VIKOR method for decision-making problems in lean tool selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 829–841.10.1007/s00170-013-5520-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, A. P. S., Idapalapati, S., & Subbiah, S. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making techniques for compliant polishing tool selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79, 519–530.10.1007/s00170-015-6822-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2011). An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 163–177.10.1007/s10845-009-0269-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banuelas Coronado, R., & Antony, J. (2002). Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisations. The TQM Magazine, 14, 92–99.10.1108/09544780210416702
   Google Scholar
• Banuelas, R., Tennant, C., Tuersley, I., & Tang, S. (2006). Selection of six sigma projects in the UK. The TQM Magazine, 18, 514–527.10.1108/09544780610685485
   Google Scholar
• Behara, R. S., Fontenot, G. F., & Gresham, A. (1995). Customer satisfaction measurement and analysis using six sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science 17 B-141-B-164.10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyfogle, F. W. III (2003). Implementing six sigma: Smarter solutions using statistical methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Öztürkcan, D. (2010). An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 5835–5847.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649–655.10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T. & Huang, S.-F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102, 289–301.10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-J., & Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghan-Manshadi, B., Mahmudi, H., Abedian, A., & Mahmudi, R. (2007). A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & design, 28, 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinesh Kumar, U., Saranga, H., Ramírez-Márquez, J. E., & Nowicki, D. (2007). Six sigma project selection using data envelopment analysis. The TQM Magazine, 19, 419–441.10.1108/09544780710817856
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H.-P., Chu, K.-K. Chao, P., Lee, H.-H., & Liao, Y.-C. (2011). Using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for benchmarking analysis in the hotel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 31, 2373–2389.10.1080/02642069.2010.503874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundin, A., & Cronemyr, P. (2003). Use customer feedback to choose Six Sigma projects. ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, 3, 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gijo, E., & Scaria, J. (2014). Process improvement through Six Sigma with Beta correction: A case study of manufacturing company. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 717–730.10.1007/s00170-013-5483-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwo-Hshiung, T. (2010). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, G. J., Hill, W. J., Hoerl, R. W., & Zinkgraf, S. A. (1999). The impact of Six Sigma improvement—a glimpse into the future of statistics. The American Statistician, 53, 208–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensley, R. L., & Dobie, K. (2005). Assessing readiness for six sigma in a service setting. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15, 82–101.10.1108/09604520510575281
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. C., Jenicke, L. O., & Hempel, J. L. (2015). A framework for Six Sigma project selection in higher educational institutions, using a weighted scorecard approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 23, 30–46.10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilangkumaran, M., Sasirekha, V., Anojkumar, L., & Boopathi Raja, M. (2012). Machine tool selection using AHP and VIKOR methodologies under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Modelling in Operations Management, 2, 409–436.10.1504/IJMOM.2012.049133
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen, F., Leist, S., & Zellner, G. (2011). Six sigma as a business process management method in services: Analysis of the key application problems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 9, 307–332.10.1007/s10257-010-0128-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuei, C.-H. (2004). Leading Six Sigma: A step-by-step guide based on experience with GE and other Six Sigma companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21, 467–468.
   Google Scholar
• Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six Sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 193–203.10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Chen, Y. Z., & Fan, X. J. (2014). Site selection in municipal solid waste management with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 72, 4179–4189.10.1007/s12665-014-3314-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modarres, M., & Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2005). Fuzzy simple additive weighting method by preference ratio. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 11, 235–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammady, P., & Amid, A. (2011). Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 3, 411–431.10.1007/s12543-011-0095-4
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., Dawal, S. Z. M., Nukman, Y., & Aoyama, H. (2014). A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 3078–3090.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12983–12990.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445–455.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi, R., Khanduja, D., & Sharma, S. (2015). Synergy of fuzzy AHP and Six Sigma for capacity waste management in Indian automotive industry. Decision Science Letters, 4, 441–452.10.5267/j.dsl.2015.1.005
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, R. A. (1996). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 155–181.10.1016/0165-0114(95)00166-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Cristóbal, J. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36, 498–502.10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., & Tarokh, M. J. (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12160–12167.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, C.-T., & Chou, C.-J. (2008). A systematic methodology for the creation of Six Sigma projects: A case study of semiconductor foundry. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2693–2703.10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, L. I., Chen, C. C., & Wang, C. H. (2007). Optimization of multi-response processes using the VIKOR method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31, 1049–1057.10.1007/s00170-005-0284-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treichler, D., Carmichael, B., Kusmanoff, A., Lewis, J., & Berthiez, G. (2002). Design for Six Sigma: 15 lessons learned. Quality Progress, 35, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Vats, G., & Vaish, R. (2013). Piezoelectric material selection for transducers under fuzzy environment. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2, 141–148.10.1007/s40145-013-0053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Varadharajan, A. R., & Subramanian, A. (2013). Application of fuzzy VIKOR for concept selection in an agile environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65, 825–832.10.1007/s00170-012-4220-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Liu, S. , Wang, S., & Lai K.-K. (2010). A weighted product method for bidding strategies in multi-attribute auctions. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 23, 194–208.10.1007/s11424-010-9337-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G. H., Conti, T., Kondo, Y., & Watson, G. (2003). Six-Sigma: An evolving stage in the maturity of quality. Quality into the 21st Century: Perspectives on Quality and Competitiveness for Sustained Performance (pp. 219–236). Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. The international journal of advanced manufacturing Technology, 28, 839–844.10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaboli, R., Tourani, S. Seyedin, S. H., & Manesh, A. O. (2014). Prioritizing the determinants of social-health inequality in Iran: A Multiple attribute decision making application. Iranian red crescent medical journal, 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q.-L., Li, D.-D., & Yang, Y.-B. (2013). VIKOR method with enhanced accuracy for multiple criteria decision making in healthcare management. Journal of medical systems, 37, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhang, J. Lai, K.-K., & Lu, Y. (2009). An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 9557–9563.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar