Multi-criteria evaluation of financial statement quality based on hesitant fuzzy judgments with assessing attitude

References

• Beest, F., Braam, G., & Boelens, S. (2009). Quality of financial reporting: Measuring qualitative characteristics. NiCE Working Paper 09–108. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE).
   Google Scholar
• Boschetti, F., Richert, C., Walkerb, I., Price, J., & Dutra, L. (2012). Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modeling. Ecological Modelling, 247, 98–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., & Peel, M. (2016). The timeliness of UK private company financial reporting: Regulatory and economic influences. The British Accounting Review, 38, 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Dursun, M., Karsak, E. E., & Karadayi, M. A. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making framework for evaluating health-care waste disposal alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11453–11462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, B., & Elliot, J. (2009). Financial Accounting and Reporting (13th ed.). Harlow, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall, Chapter 7.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, B., & Lai, F. (2014). Multi-attribute group decision making with aspirations: A case study. Omega, 44, 136–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, A., & Jiang, H. (2015). Corporate governance and financial reporting quality in China: A survey of recent evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• He, X.R., Wu, Y., Yu, D. & Merigó, D. J. (2017). Exploring the ordered weighted averaging operator knowledge domain: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32, 1151–1166. doi:10.1002/int.21894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund, H., & Sundvik, D. (in press). Financial reporting quality and outsourcing of accounting tasks: Evidence from small private firms. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2889928
   Google Scholar
• Iatridis, G. (1981). International financial reporting standards and the quality of financial statement information. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19, 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2010.02.004
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2010). Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Chapter 3, QC1-QC34. IASB. Retrieved from http://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/standards/other/framework
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.B., Li, L., Lu, L.Y., & Yu, Y. (2016). Financial statement comparability and excepted crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 294–312. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2709908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. F. (2005). An approach to fuzzy multi-attribute decision making under uncertainty. Information Sciences, 169, 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. M., Xu, J. P., Lev, B., & Gang, J. (2015). Multi-criteria group individual research output evaluation based on context-free grammar judgments with assessing attitude. Omage, 57, 282–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Zeng, X. J. (2014). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Information Sciences, 271, 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., Zeng, X. J., & Merigó, J. M. (2015). Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 76, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2006). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 283–308). New York: Springer, US.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C., & Roslender, R. (2015). Enhancing financial reporting: The contribution of business models. The British Accounting Review, 47, 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 3–4, 193–215. doi:10.1080/0144341910110301
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1966). Attitude change and behavioral change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(4), 529–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton-Green, B., & Hodgkinson, R. (2011). Measurement in financial reporting: Information for better markets initiative (pp. 44–45). London: Financial Reporting Faculty, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Retrieved from http://www.icaew.com/~/media/corporate/files/technical/financial\%20reporting/information\%20for\%20better\%20markets/ifbm/measurement\%20in\%20financial\%20reporting.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Thuong, N. T. H., Li, Z., & Hong, P. T. D. (2016). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for financial statement quality evaluation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 502, 659–676.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2007). Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transaction of Fuzzy Systems, 15, 1179–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2015). Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, D. J. (2012). Group decision making based on generalized intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized geometric operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(7), 635–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurisandi, T., & Puspitasari, E. (2015). Financial reporting quality - before and after IFRS adoption using NICE qualitative characteristic measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 644–652.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2014). Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 3, 794–801.
   Google Scholar