References
- The JARS group. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology. American Psychologist, 63(9), 839–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
- Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588
- The Cochrane Collaboration. (2014). Review manager (RevMan) (Version 5.3) [Computer software]. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.
- Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- SAS Institute. (2020). SAS [Computer software]. SAS Inc. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/stat.html
- IBM Inc. (2021). SPSS [Computer software]. IBM Inc. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
- LLC, S. (2021). Stata (Version 17) [Computer software]. StatCorp. http://stata.com
- Alexander, R. A., Scozzaro, M. J., & Borodkin, L. J. (1989). Statistical and empirical examination of the chi-square test for homogeneity of correlations in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 329–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.329
- Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x
- Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. M. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154
- Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., & Moons, K. G. M. (2007). A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-40
- Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2015). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 3) [Computer software]. Biostat. https://www.meta-analysis.com/
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2016). When does it make sense to perform a meta-analysis? In M. Borenstein, L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, & H. R. Rothstein (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
- Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017). Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1230
- Brannick, M. T. (2015). Meta-analysis. Retrieved 2021, March 6, from http://faculty.cas.usf.edu/mbrannick/meta/index.html
- Cafri, G., Kromrey, J. D., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(2), 239–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680187
- Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 796–815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000083
- Carter, E. C., Schonbrodt, F., Gervais, W., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
- Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
- Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521.
- Cheung, M. W.-L., & Hong, R. Y. (2017). Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modeling in health psychology: Examples, issues, and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 11(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1343678
- Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729380
- Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). Sage.
- Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2019a). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. (3rd ed, pp. 3–16). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2019b). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. (3rd ed.).Russell Sage Foundation.
- Cornwell, J. M., & Ladd, R. T. (1993). Power and accuracy of the Schmidt and Hunter meta-analytic procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 877–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053004002
- Cuijpers, P. (2016). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psychological interventions of the Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam. Retrieved March, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP7_VBrG_TY&t=10s
- Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. L. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
- Egger, M., Smith, D. G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
- Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10068. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068
- Giustini, D. (2019). Retrieving grey literature, information, and data in the digital age. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 101–126). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Glanville, J. (2019). Searching bibliographic databases. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 73–100). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
- Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Sage.
- Greco, T., Landoni, G., Biondi-Zoccai, G., D'Ascenzo, F., & Zangrillo, A. (2016). A Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: How to do it. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(5), 1757–1773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213500185
- Gucciardi, D. F., Lines, R. L. J., & Ntoumanis, N.. (2021). Handling effect size dependency in meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1946835
- Hagger, M. S. (2006). Meta-analysis in sport and exercise research: Review, recent developments, and recommendations. European Journal of Sport Science, 6(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390500528527
- Hagger, M. S. (2010). Self-regulation: An important construct in health psychology research and practice. Health Psychology Review, 4(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.503594
- Hagger, M. S. (2019a). Embracing open science and transparency in health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 13(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1605614
- Hagger, M. S. (2019b). Habit and physical activity: Theoretical advances, practical implications, and agenda for future research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 118–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.007
- Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., & Lintunen, T. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of behavior change. Cambridge University Press.
- Hagger, M. S., Chan, D. K. C., Protogerou, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2016). Using meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illustration based on meta-analyses of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 89, 154–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.020
- Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Angonno, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A., Brand, R., Brandt, M. J., Brewer, G., Bruyneel, S., Calvillo, D. P., Campbell, D. K., Cannon, P. R., Carlucci, M., Carruth, N., Cheung, T., Crowell, A., De Ridder, D. T. D., Dewitte, S., … Zwienenberg M. (2016). A multi-lab pre-registered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546–573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873
- Hagger, M. S., Cheung, M. W. L., Ajzen, I., & Hamilton, K. (2021). Moderation effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis in the health behavior domain. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3W2K7
- Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2020). General causality orientations in self-determination theory: Meta-analysis and test of a process model. European Journal of Personality, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962330
- Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2021). Effects of socio-structural variables in the theory of planned behavior: A mediation model in multiple samples and behaviors. Psychology & Health, 36(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1784420
- Hagger, M. S., Koch, S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Orbell, S. (2017). The common-sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychological Bulletin, 143(11), 1117–1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000118
- Hagger, M. S., Moyers, S., McAnally, K., & McKinley, L. E. (2020). Known knowns and known unknowns on behavior change interventions and mechanisms of action. Health Psychology Review, 14(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1719184
- Hagger, M. S., Polet, J., & Lintunen, T. (2018). The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and test of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Social Science & Medicine, 213, 85–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.038
- Hagger, M. S., & Weed, M. E. (2019). DEBATE: Do behavioral interventions work in the real world? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0795-4
- Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
- Hales, A. H., Wesselmann, E. D., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Improving psychological science through transparency and openness: An overview. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00186-8
- Hamilton, K., van Dongen, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for parent-for-child health behaviors: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 39(10), 863–878. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000940
- Harari, M. B., Parola, H. R., Hartwell, C. J., & Riegelman, A. (2020). Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103377
- Hardcastle, S. J., Fortier, M. S., Blake, N., & Hagger, M. S. (2017). Identifying content-based and relational techniques to change behavior in motivational interviewing. Health Psychology Review, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1190659
- Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2551803
- Hedges, L. V. (1984). Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effects of censoring studies yielding statistically insignificant mean differences. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986009001061
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
- Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 426–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.426
- Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
- Higgins, J. P. T., Savović, J., Page, M. J., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2019). Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/current-version-of-rob-2
- Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2021). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
- Hoaglin, D. C. (2016). Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test’ in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 35(4), 485–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6632
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. Random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge in psychology. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies (Vol. 4). Sage.
- IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 6(7), e010247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774507079441
- Iyengar, S., & Greenhouse, J. B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013012
- Johnson, B. T., Low, R. E., & MacDonald, H. V. (2015). Panning for the gold in health research: Incorporating studies’ methodological quality in meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 30(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.953533
- Kitayama, S. (2017). Editorial: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 357–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000077
- Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams Jr, R. B., Bahník, Š, Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., … Nosek Brian A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
- Kwasnicka, D., ten Hoor, G. A., van Dongen, A., Gruszczyńska, E., Hagger, M. S., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., Heino, M. T. J., Kotzur, M., Noone, C., Rothman, A. J., Toomey, E., Warner, L. M., Kok, G., Peters, G.-J., & Luszczynska, A. (2020). Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: Results of the synergy expert meeting of the European health psychology society. Health Psychology Review, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037
- Lakens, D. (2020). Introduction to meta-analysis. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO6s8dFBmPc
- López-López, J. A., Page, M. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2018). Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1310
- Lortie, C. J., & Filazzola, A. (2020). A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R. Ecology and Evolution, 10(20), 10916–10921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6747
- Love, J., Dropmann, D., Selker, R., Gallucci, M., Jentschke, S., & Balci, S. (2021). jamovi [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
- Lumley, T. (2018). rmeta [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmeta/rmeta.pdf
- Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001). A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 20(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.698
- McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M. T., Taylor, N., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684
- McEwan, D., Harden, S. M., Zumbo, B. D., Sylvester, B. D., Kaulius, M., Ruissen, G. R., Dowd, A. J., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2016). The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 10(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1104258
- McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 730–749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243
- Moreau, D., & Gamble, B. (2020). Conducting a meta-analysis in the age of open science: Tools, tips, and practical recommendations. Psychological Methods, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000351
- Moyer, A., & Finney, J. W. (2005). Rating methodological quality: Toward improved assessment and investigation. Accountability in Research, 12(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620500440287
- Moyers, S. A., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Physical activity and sense of coherence: A meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1846068
- Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
- Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., … McDonald, S. (2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
- Peters, G.-J. Y., de Bruin, M., & Crutzen, R. (2015). Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: Towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychology Review, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.848409
- Polanin, J. R., Hennessy, E. A., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2017). A review of meta-analysis packages in R. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42(2), 206–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998616674315
- Protogerou, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology methods in psychology. Methods in Psychology, 3, 100031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100031
- Protogerou, C., Johnson, B. T., & Hagger, M. S. (2018). An integrated model of condom use in sub-Saharan African youth: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 37(6), 586–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000604
- Pustejovsky, J. E., & Rodgers, M. A. (2019). Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1332
- Quintana, D. S. (2015a). Conducting a meta-analysis with R. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1pYHfCKhyA&t=17s
- Quintana, D. S. (2015b). From pre-registration to publication: A non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549
- Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2008). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
- Rhodes, R. E., Boudreau, F., Weman Josefsson, K., & Ivarsson, A. (2020). Mediators of physical activity behavior change interventions among adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1706614
- Rhodes, R. E., McEwan, D., & Rebar, A. L. (2019). Theories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 100–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.010
- Rodgers, M. A., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2021). Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes. Psychological Methods, 26(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000300
- Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). The fugitive literature. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 85–94). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Ryan, R. (2016). Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group: Meta-analysis. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from https://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/meta-analysis_revised_december_1st_1_2016.pdf
- Schimmack, U. (2020). A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 61(4), 364–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000246
- Schmidt, F. L., Le, H. U. Y., & Oh, I.-S. (2019). Correcting for the distorting effects of study artifacts in meta-analysis and second order meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 315–338). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Schwarzer, G., Carpenter, J. R., & Rücker, G. (2015). Meta-analysis with R. Springer.
- Sheeran, P., Klein, W. M. P., & Rothman, A. J. (2017). Health behavior change: Moving from observation to intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 573–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044007
- Sheeran, P., Wright, C. E., Avishai, A., Villegas, M. E., Lindemans, J. W., Klein, W. M. P., Rothman, A. J., Miles, E., & Ntoumanis, N. (2020). Self-determination theory interventions for health behavior change: Meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(8), 726–737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000501
- Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
- Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
- Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
- Spence, J. C., & Blanchard, C. (2001). Publication bias in sport and exercise psychology: The games we play. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32(4), 386–399.
- Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C., & Doucouliagos, H. (2018). What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000169
- Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095
- Sterling, T. D., Rosenbaum, W. L., & Weinkam, J. J. (1995). Publication decisions revisited: The effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. The American Statistician, 49(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476125
- Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rücker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., Tetzlaff, J., Deeks, J. J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343(Jul22 1), d4002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002
- Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., & Hak, T. (2017). Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(4), 537–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1260
- Turner, R. M., Bird, S. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2013). The impact of study size on meta-analyses: Examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059202
- Turner, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). Bayesian meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 299–314). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need?: A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961
- van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018). Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the P-uniform* method. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/zqjr9
- van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2019). Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(4), e0215052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215052
- van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000025
- Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias. Psychometrika, 60(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294384
- Vevea, J. L., & Woods, C. M. (2005). Publication Bas in research synthesis: Sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 428–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.428
- Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ly, A., Boutin, B., Goosen, J., de Jong, T., Raj, A., Gronau, Q. F., Sarafoglou, A., van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J., Matzke, D., van Kesteren, E.-J., Grasman, R., Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., Gu, X., Morey, R., Derks, K., … Kucharský, Š. (2020). JASP [Computer Software] (Version 0.14). The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam. https://jasp-stats.org/
- Wallace, B. C., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2009). Meta-analyst: Software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-80
- Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H.-N. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes”. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203
- White, H. D. (2021). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 52–72). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Zhang, C. Q., Zhang, R., Schwarzer, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). A meta-analysis of the health action process approach. Health Psychology, 38(7), 623–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000728