Realist review

References

• Agha, R., & Rosin, D. (2015). The Research Registry–answering the call to register every research study involving human participants. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 4(2), 95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Astbury, B., & Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010371972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, R. C., & Nanavati, J. (2016). Realist review: Current practice and future prospects. Journal of Research Practice, 12(1), R1–R1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2014). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, A., & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of change and realistic evaluation. Evaluation, 13(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082129
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Briscoe, S., & Wright, J. M. (2020). The “realist search”: A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., & Carroll, C. (2015). Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: Is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Harris, J., Croot, E., Springett, J., Campbell, F., & Wilkins, E. (2013). Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: Case study (CLUSTER). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Booth, A., Wright, J., & Briscoe, S. (2018). Scoping and searching to support realist approaches. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 147–165). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, V., Harwood, R., Hancox, J. E., Hood-Moore, V., Masud, T., & Logan, P. (2019). Motivation as a mechanism underpinning exercise-based falls prevention programmes for older adults with cognitive impairment: A realist review. BMJ Open, 9(6), e024982. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N., Bryce, M., Pearson, M., Wong, G., Cooper, C., & Archer, J. (2014). Understanding how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: A realist review protocol. BMJ Open, 4(6), e005466–e005466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton, L. J., Evans, C. J., Man, W. D., & Maddocks, M. (2020). Improving exercise-based interventions for people living with both COPD and frailty: A realist review. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Volume 15, 841–855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s238680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. E., Atkin, A. J., Panter, J., Wong, G., Chinapaw, M. J. M., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2017). Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: A systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Obesity Reviews, 18(4), 491–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2009). Implications of attachment theory for sport and physical activity research: Conceptual links with achievement goal and peer-relationship models. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840902759173
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical program evaluation: Theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Lhussier, M., & Carr, S. (2020). Blurring the boundaries between synthesis and evaluation. A customized realist evaluative synthesis into adolescent risk behavior prevention. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(3), 457–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, E. K., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2019). Lessons from the experts: The effect of a cognitive processing intervention during deliberate practice of a complex task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41(5), 298–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2017-0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337(7676), a1655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2019). CASP systematic review checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
   Google Scholar
• Dalkin, S. M., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidoff, F., Dixon-Woods, M., Leviton, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Monaghan, M., & Dalkin, S. (2018). Doing realist research. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, G., Allman-Farinelli, M., & Redfern, J. (2020). Effectiveness of family-based behavior change interventions on obesity-related behavior change in children: A realist synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPPI Centre. (2019). What is a systematic review? http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=67
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D. M. (2017). Evidence and health policy: Using and regulating systematic reviews. American Journal of Public Health, 107(1), 88–92. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, A. R., Faulkner, G., Ciliska, D., & Hicks, A. (2015). Corrigendum to “factors contributing to the effectiveness of physical activity counselling in primary care: A realist systematic review”. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(7), 923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.001. [Patient Educ. Couns. 98 (4) (412–419].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gledhill, A., & Forsdyke, D. (2021). Realist synthesis in sport and exercise medicine: “time to get real.”. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 102073–102073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102073
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, J., & Manzano, A. (2021). Understanding “context” in realist evaluation and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1918484
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis? BMJ, 348(jun13 4), g3725–g3725. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris, K. (2018). Building sport for development practitioners’ capacity for undertaking monitoring and evaluation – reflections on a training programme building capacity in realist evaluation. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 795–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1442870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, R. E. (2001, July 16th). Knowledge mapping for complex social messes. [Paper presentation]. David and Lucile Packard Foundation, California, USA. https://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/TC510-Fall2011/HornKnowledgeMapping.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. (2019). Realist synthesis for public health: Building an ontologically deep understanding of how programs work, for whom, and in which contexts. Annual Review of Public Health, 40(1), 361–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. (2020). Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley’s applied scientific realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1723301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J., Pluye, P., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Herbert, C. P., Green, L. W., Greenhalgh, T., & Macaulay, A. C. (2013). Critical reflections on realist review: Insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, K. N., Polce, E. M., Vadhera, A., Williams, B. T., Nwachukwu, B. U., Nho, S. J., & Chahla, J. (2020). What Is the predictive ability and academic impact of the Altmetrics score and social media attention? The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1056–1062. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520903703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehe, R. T. (1998). Realism and reality. Journal of Philosophical Research, 23, 219–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_19
   Google Scholar
• Leone, L., & Pesce, C. (2017). From delivery to adoption of physical activity guidelines: Realist synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10), 1193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, I., Booth, A., Mullan, J., McKeown, J., Bailey, S., & Wong, G. (2017). Developing a framework for a novel multi-disciplinary, multi-agency intervention(s), to improve medication management in community-dwelling older people on complex medication regimens (MEMORABLE)––a realist synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0528-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manville, C., Jones, M. M., Henham, M. L., Castle-Clarke, S., Frearson, M., Gunashekar, S., & Grant, J. (2015). Preparing impact submissions for REF 2014: An evaluation. RAND Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., Kegels, K., & Van Belle, S. (2018). Theory and realist methods. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 79–91). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., van Belle, S., van Olmen, J., Hoerée, T., & Kegels, G. (2012). Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation, 18(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012442444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., Oatley, C., Harris, K., & Ryan, L. (2021). How and why does local area coordination work for people in different contexts? Methodological Innovations, 14(1), 205979912098538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120985381
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1967). On theoretical sociology: five essays, old and new (No. HM51 M392).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., Moore, L., O’Cathain, A., Tinati, T., Wight, D., & Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 350(mar19 6), h1258–h1258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., Hendry, M., Booth, A., Chandler, J., Lewin, S., Glenton, C., & Garside, R. (2016). Current use was established and Cochrane guidance on selection of social theories for systematic reviews of complex interventions was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 78–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of `realist synthesis’. Evaluation, 8(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135638902401462448
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006a). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006b). Digging for nuggets: How “Bad” research Can yield “good” evidence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595314
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The Science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. United Kingdom Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2018). Realist memorabilia. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 203–220). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction (pp. 1–55). Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 21–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Chilton, R., Woods, H. B., Wyatt, K., Ford, T., Abraham, C., & Anderson, R. (2012). Implementing health promotion in schools: Protocol for a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom (UK). Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Punton, M., Vogel, I., & Lloyd, R. (2016). Reflections from a realist evaluation in progress: Scaling ladders and stitching theory. Opendocs.ids.ac.uk. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/11254
   Google Scholar
• RAMESES II Project. (2017a). Philosophies and evaluation design: The RAMESES II Project. https://www.ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_Philosophies_and_evaluation_design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RAMESES II Project. (2017b). Developing realist programme theories: The RAMESES II Project. https://ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_Developing_realist_programme_theories.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RAMESES II Project. (2017c). Protocols and realist evaluation: The RAMESES II Project. https://ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_Protocols_and_realist_evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., Wallin, L., & Wilson, V. (2012). Realist synthesis: Illustrating the method for implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearn, K., Allmark, P., Piercy, H., & Hirst, J. (2017). Building realist program theory for large complex and messy interventions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691774179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917741796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Such, E., Burton, H., Copeland, R. J., Davies, R., Goyder, E., Jeanes, R., Kesterton, S., Mackenzie, K., & Magee, J. (2019). Developing a theory-driven framework for a football intervention for men with severe, moderate or enduring mental health problems: A participatory realist synthesis. Journal of Mental Health, 29(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1581339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., Lubarsky, S., Durning, S. J., & Young, M. E. (2017). Knowledge Syntheses in Medical education. Academic Medicine, 92(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tod, D. (2019). Conducting systematic reviews in sport, exercise, and physical activity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2013). Developing complexity-consistent theory in a realist investigation. Evaluation, 19(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013505042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist impact evaluation: An introduction, 1–12. Overseas Development Institute. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/9138.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G. (2018). Data gathering in realist reviews: Looking for needles in haystacks. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 131–145). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses. BMC Medicine, 11(1), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-21
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2014). Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: The RAMESES (realist And meta-narrative evidence syntheses–evolving standards) project. Health Services and Delivery Research, 2(30). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr02300
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. JAMA, 310(20), 2191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar