Meta-analyzing enhanced expectancies on motor learning: positive effects but methodological concerns

References

• *Abbas, Z. A., & North, J. S. (2018). Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learning and Instruction, 55, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Abe, M., Schambra, H., Wassermann, E. M., Luckenbaugh, D., Schweighofer, N., & Cohen, L. G. (2011). Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains. Current Biology, 21(7), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ávila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 849–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bacelar, M. F. B., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2020). The effect of rewards and punishments on learning action selection and execution components of a motor skill. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(3), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2019-0039
   Google Scholar
• *Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bahmani, M., Diekfuss, J. A., Rostami, R., Ataee, N., & Ghadiri, F. (2018). Visual illusions affect motor performance, but not learning in highly skilled shooters. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0011
   Google Scholar
• *Bahmani, M., Wulf, G., Ghadiri, F., Karimi, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2017). Enhancing performance expectancies through visual illusions facilitates motor learning in children. Human Movement Science, 55, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barker, J., Jones, M., & Greenlees, I. (2010). Assessing the immediate and maintained effects of hypnosis on self-efficacy and soccer wall-volley performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barzouka, K., Bergeles, N., & Hatziharistos, D. (2007). Effect of simultaneous model observation and self-modeling of volleyball skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.1.32-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, A. R., Vigotsky, A. D., Tenan, M. S., Radel, R., Mellor, D. T., Kreutzer, A., Lahart, I. M., Mills, J. P., Boisgontier, M. P., & Consortium for Transparency in Exercise Science (COTES) Collaborators. (2020). Moving sport and exercise science forward: A call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Medicine, 50(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Gervais, W. M., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
   Google Scholar
• *Carter, M. J., Smith, V., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2016). Judgments of learning are significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively poor trials despite no actual learning differences. Human Movement Science, 45, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chauvel, G., Wulf, G., & Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 717–721. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., Ávila, L., & Kaefer, A. (2010). Efeitos do feedback após boas tentativas de prática na aprendizagem de uma habilidade motora complexa em crianças. Revista Da Educação Física/UEM, 21(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v21i2.7745
   Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., Cardozo, P. L., & Chalabaev, A. (2018). Age stereotypes’ effects on motor learning in older adults: The impact may not be immediate, but instead delayed. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 36, 209–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2014). Effects of generic versus non-generic feedback on motor learning in children. Plos One, 9(2), e88989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2016). Temporal-comparative feedback affects motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0034
   Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., & Harter, N. M. (2015). Perceptions of competence and motor learning: Performance criterion resulting in low success experience degrades learning. Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.2015-0002
   Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., Harter, N. M., Gonçalves, G. S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2019). Temporal-comparative feedback facilitates golf putting. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(3), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chung, Y., Lewthwaite, R., Winstein, C. J., Monterosso, J. R., & Fisher, B. E. (2020). Expectancy and affective response to challenging balance practice conditions in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(6), 3652–3662. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Diekfuss, J. A., & Raisbeck, L. D. (2016). Focus of attention and instructional feedback from NCAA division 1 collegiate coaches. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0026
   Google Scholar
• *Drews, R., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2013). Children’s motor skill learning is influenced by their conceptions of ability. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(2), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.2.38
   Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, G., Sarnelle, O., & Cooper, S. D. (1999). The importance of data-selection criteria: Meta-analyses of stream predation experiments. Ecology, 80(4), 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1132:TIODSC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90(3), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ghorbani, S. (2019). Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory. The Journal of General Psychology, 146(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2018.1535486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ghorbani, S., & Bund, A. (2020). Motivational effects of enhanced expectancies for motor learning in individuals with high and low self-efficacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 127(1), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519892390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Goudini, R., Saemi, E., Ashrafpoornavaee, S., & Abdoli, B. (2018). The effect of feedback after good and poor trials on the continuous motor tasks learning. Acta Gymnica, 48(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2018.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Grealy, M. A., Cummings, J., & Quinn, K. (2019). The effect of false positive feedback on learning an inhibitory-action task in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 45(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2019.1627494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., Butler, M. S., & Fischman, M. G. (1995). On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: Measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1995.9941714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide. https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/
   Google Scholar
• *Harter, N. M., Cardozo, P. L., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2019). Conceptions of ability influence the learning of a dance pirouette in children. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 23(4), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.12678/1089-313X.23.4.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (*) Included in meta-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• *Jennings, C. T., Reaburn, P., & Rynne, S. B. (2013). The effect of a self-modelling video intervention on motor skill acquisition and retention of a novice track cyclist’s standing start performance. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 8(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.8.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Diaz, J., Chaves-Castro, K., & Morera-Castro, M. (2020). Effect of self-controlled and regulated feedback on motor skill performance and learning: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Motor Behavior, 53(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1782825
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., Jimenez-Diaz, J., & Chen, J. (2017).The effect of attentional focus in balancing tasks: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.122.22
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest (grand Rapids, Mich ), 46(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lessa, H. T., Tani, G., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Benefits of enhanced expectancies through temporal-comparative feedback for motor learning in older adults. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 49(6), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2018.49.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, K., Buchanan, T., & Miller, M. (2016). Underpowered and overworked: Problems with data analysis in motor learning studies. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0010
   Google Scholar
• Lohse, K. R., Sherwood, D. E., & Healy, A. F. (2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science, 29(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, K., Pedroni, A., Nadig, K., Luechinger, R., & Jäncke, L. (2012). The rewarding value of good motor performance in the context of monetary incentives. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1739–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makaruk, H., Starzak, M., & Marak Porter, J. (2020). Influence of attentional manipulation on jumping performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Human Kinetics, 75(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2020-0037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, L. A., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2021). Risk-of-bias visualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, J. B., Gale, D. J., Gallivan, J. P., Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2020). Human decision making anticipates future performance in motor learning. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(2), e1007632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Navaee, S. A., Abedanzadeh, R., Salar, S., & Sharif, M. R. (2018). The effects of positive normative feedback on learning a throwing task among children with autism spectrum disorder. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 7(2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_71_17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Navaee, S. A., Farsi, A., & Abdoli, B. (2016). The effect of normative feedback on stability and efficacy of some selected muscles in a balancing task. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 5(1), 43–52. Retrieved June 19, 2020, from http://www.ijaep.com/index.php/IJAE/article/view/46
   Google Scholar
• *Ong, N. T., Hawke, J., & Hodges, N. J. (2019). Target size manipulations affect error-processing duration and success perceptions but not behavioural indices of learning. Brain Sciences, 9(5), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9050119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). Balancing our perceptions of the efficacy of success-based feedback manipulations on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(6), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ong, N. T., Lohse, K. R., & Hodges, N. J. (2015). Manipulating target size influences perceptions of success when learning a dart-throwing skill but does not impact retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Palmer, K., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2016). Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pascua, L. A. M., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2015). Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.922693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, J. L., Nakagawa, S., & Noble, D. W. A. (2018). Reproducible, flexible and high-throughput data extraction from primary literature: The metaDigitise R package. Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/247775
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. M., Wu, W. F. W., & Partridge, J. A. (2010). Focus of attention and verbal instructions: Strategies of elite track and field coaches and athletes. Sport Science Review, 19(3-4), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10237-011-0018-7
   Google Scholar
• *Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(4), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Saemi, E., Wulf, G., Varzaneh, A. G., & Zarghami, M. (2011). "Feedback" após boas versus más tentativas melhora a aprendizagem motora em crianças. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 25(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-55092011000400011
   Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Braun, E. K., Wager, T. D., & Shohamy, D. (2014). Mind matters: Placebo enhances reward learning in Parkinson’s disease. Nature Neuroscience, 17(12), 1793–1797. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2020). Motor learning and performance: From principles to application (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). p-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Steel, A., Silson, E. H., Stagg, C. J., & Baker, C. I. (2016). The impact of reward and punishment on skill learning depends on task demands. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36056
   Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Vertes, K., Rymal, A. M., & Martini, R. (2011). Feedforward self-modeling enhances skill acquisition in children learning trampoline skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., Emberson, J. R., Hernán, M. A., Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D. R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, J. J., Lasserson, T., Li, T., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., Tetzlaff, J., Deeks, J. J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343, d4002–d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration. (2013). Supplementary guidance for authors undertaking reviews with the cochrane consumers and communication review group. http://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Study_design_guide2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A. (2004). Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(4), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Cardozo, P., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Hooyman, A. (2013). Can ability conceptualizations alter the impact of social comparison in motor learning? Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, M., Diekfuss, J. A., & Raisbeck, L. D. (2020). Motor behavior literature fails to translate: A preliminary investigation into coaching and focus of attention in recreational distance runners. International Journal of Exercise Science, 3, 789–801.
   Google Scholar
• *Ziv, G., Lidor, R., & Lavie, M. (2019). Enhanced expectancies in golf putting – A replication study with increased ecological validity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2019.1637362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ziv, G., Ochayon, M., & Lidor, R. (2019). Enhanced or diminished expectancies in golf putting—Which actually affects performance? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 40, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zobe, C., Krause, D., & Blischke, K. (2019). Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence. Human Movement Science, 66, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar