789
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Normative Legitimacy Gap: International Sports Associations, Human Rights and Stakeholder Democracy

References

  • Adams, A. and M. Piekarz. 2015. Sport events and human rights: Positive promotion or negative erosion? Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 7 (3): 220–36. doi:10.1080/19407963.2014.997864
  • Amis, L. 2013. Striving for excellence: Mega sporting events and human rights, Occasional Paper Series, Paper no. 2. London: Institute for Human Rights and Business. Available at https://www.ihrb.org/pdf/2013-10-21_IHRB_Mega-Sporting-Events-Paper_Web.pdf. (accessed 12 October 2017).
  • Ashforth, B.E. and B.E. Gibbs. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organizational Science 1 (2): 177–94. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
  • Astor, H. 2007. Mediator neutrality: Making sense of theory and practice. Social and Legal Studies 16 (2): 221–39. doi:10.1177/0964663907076531
  • Bistagnino, G. 2016. Legitimacy in the European Union: What’s throughput got to do with it? Working Paper 3/16, 1-24. Centro di Ricerca e Documentazione. Available at file:///C:/Users/orelio/Downloads/WP_Bistagnino.pdf (accessed 5 February 2018).
  • Bodemar, A. and E. Skille. 2016. ‘Stuck in structure’: How young leaders experienced the institutional frames at the Youth Olympic Games in Innsbruck, 2012. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 51 (8): 940–56. doi:10.1177/1012690214563198
  • Buchanan, A. and R.O. Keohane. 2008. The legitimacy of global governance institutions. In Legitimacy in international law, edited by L.R. Wolfrum and V. Röben. Berlin: Springer: 25–63.
  • Cassese, A. 2002. Are human rights truly universal? In The politics of human rights, edited by O. Savic. London: Verso: 149–66.
  • Chappelet, J.-L. 2016. Autonomy and governance: Necessary bedfellows in the fight against corruption in sport. In Transparency international global corruption report: Sport, edited by G. Sweeney. Abington: Routledge: 16–28.
  • Chappelet, J.-L. 2018. Beyond governance: The need to improve the regulation of international sport. Sport in Society 21 (5): 724–34. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1401355
  • Cordelli, C. 2017. Neutrality of what? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (1): 36–48. doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1253161
  • Dorsey, J.S. 2017. Tackling the elephant in the room: The incestuous and inseparable relationship between sports and politics. playthegame.org, 13 September. Available at http://www.playthegame.org/news/comments/2017/047_tackling-the-elephant-in-the-room-the-incestuous-and-inseparable-relationship-between-sports-and-politics (accessed 23 November 2017).
  • Duval, A. and B.V. Rompuy, eds. 2016. The legacy of Bosman. Revisiting the relationship between EU law and sport. Berlin: Springer/Asser press.
  • Elcombe, T. 2010. Thinking small about sport: A philosophical recovery of moral leadership. In Philosophy of sport: International perspectives, edited by A. Hardman and C. Jones. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 6–22.
  • Falk, R. 2012. Introduction: Legality and legitimacy. In Legality and legitimacy in global affairs, edited by R. Falk, M. Juergensmeyer, and V. Popovski. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 3–44.
  • Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIA). 2016a. Code of ethics. Paris: FIA. Available at https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/basicpage/file/20141219/2014-12-17-Code%20of%20Ethics%20(FR-EN)-2015%20version%20with%20new%20logo.pdf (accessed 20 November 2017).
  • Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA). 2016b. FIA activity report. Paris: FIA. Available at https://www.fia.com/multimedia/publication/2016-fia-activity-report (accessed 29 November 2017).
  • FIFA. 2017. FIFA’s human rights policy. Zurich: FIFA. Available at http://resources.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/footballgovernance/02/89/33/12/fifashumanrightspolicy_neutral.pdf (accessed 20 November 2017).
  • Forster, J. 2006. Global sports governance and corruption. Palgrave Communications 2: 15048. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.48
  • Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Toronto: Pitman Publishing.
  • Friedman, L.M. 2011. The human rights culture: A study in history and context. New Orleans: Quid Pro Quo Books.
  • Friedman, M.T., M.M. Parent, and D.S. Mason. 2004. Building a framework for issues management in sport through stakeholder theory. European Sport Management Quarterly 4 (3): 170–90. doi:10.1080/16184740408737475
  • Gauthier, R. 2017. The international olympic committee, law, and accountability. London: Routledge.
  • Geeraert, A. 2014. New EU governance modes in professional sport: Enhancing throughput legitimacy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 10 (3): 302–21.
  • Geeraert, A. 2015. Sports governance observer 2015. The legitimacy crisis in international sports governance. Copenhagen: Play the Game.
  • Geeraert, A., M. Mrkonjic, and J.-L. Chappelet. 2015. A rationalist perspective on the autonomy of international sport governing bodies: Towards a pragmatic autonomy in the steering of sports. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 7 (4): 473–88. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.925953
  • Giulianotti, R. 2004. human rights, globalization and sentimental education: The case of sport. Sport in Society 7 (3): 355–69. doi:10.1080/1743043042000291686
  • Hahn, R. and C. Weidtmann. 2016. Transnational governance, deliberative democracy, and the legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analyzing the case of a global multistakeholder process. Business and Society 55 (1): 90–129. doi:10.1177/0007650312462666
  • Hendry, J. 2001. Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1): 159–76. doi:10.2307/3857875
  • Hölzen, M. and H.E. Meier. 2018. Do football consumers care about sport governance? An analysis of social media responses to the recent FIFA scandal. Journal of Global Sport Management. doi:10.1080/24704067.2018.1432983
  • Horne, J. 2018. Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events. Leisure Studies 37 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512
  • HRSAC (Human Rights Council Advisory Committee). 2015. Final report of the human rights council advisory committee on the possibilities of Using sport and the olympic ideal to promote human rights for all and to strengthen universal respect for them. New York, NY: UN.
  • Jerabek, M.M., A.M.F. Andrade, and A.M. Figueroa. 2017. FIFA’s Hegemony: Examples from World Cup hosting countries. Global Society 31 (3): 417–40. doi:10.1080/13600826.2016.1261807
  • King, N. 2017. Sport governance. An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Krieger, J. 2018. No struggle, no Progress: The historical significance of the governance structure reform of the international association of athletics federation. Journal of Global Sport Management. doi:10.1080/24704067.2018.1477522
  • Lawrence, T. 1999. Institutional strategy. Journal of Management 25 (2): 161–88. doi:10.1177/014920639902500203
  • Liu, J.H. 2007. Lighting the torch of human rights: The olympic games as a vehicle for human rights reform. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 5 (2): 213–35.
  • Lock, D.K.F.I.L.O., T. Kunkel, and J.L. Skinner. 2015. The development of a framework to capture perceptions of sport organizations legitimacy. Journal of Sport Management 29 (4): 362–79. doi:10.1123/jsm.2014-0005
  • Louw, A. 2012. Ambush marketing and the mega-event monopoly: How laws are abused to protect commercial rights to major sporting events. Durban: Springer.
  • Lovatt, H. and M. Konecny. 2017. Will FIFA give Israeli settlement clubs a yellow card? Lobe log, May 9. Available at https://lobelog.com/will-fifa-give-israeli-settlement-clubs-a-yellow-card (accessed 18 May 2018).
  • MacAloon, J.J. 2016. Agenda 2020 and the Olympic Movement. Sport in Society 19 (6): 767–85. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1119960
  • Mena, S. and G. Palazzo. 2012. Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3): 527–56. doi:10.5840/beq201222333
  • Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63. doi:10.1086/226550
  • Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–66. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  • Mittag, J. and N. Putzmann. 2013. Reassessing the democracy debate in sport alternatives to the one association one vote principle? In Action for good governance in international sports organisations, edited by J. Alm. Copenhagen: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sport Studies: 83–97.
  • Moriarty, J. 2014. The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy: An excavation and defense. Business and Society 53 (6): 820–52. doi:10.1177/0007650312439296
  • Næss, H.E. 2018. The neutrality Myth: Why International Sport Associations and politics are inseparable. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (2): 144–60. doi:10.1080/00948705.2018.1479190
  • Naha, S. and D. Hassan. 2017. Introduction: Ethical concerns in sport governance. Sport in Society 21 (5): 721–23. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1400783
  • Neville, B.A., S.J. Bell, and G.J. Whitwell. 2011. Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refuelling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3): 357–78. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9
  • O’Dwyer, B. 2005. Stakeholder democracy: Challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (1): 28–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00384.x
  • OECD. 2016. Organising sporting events: Preventing corruption and promoting responsible business conduct. Paris: OECD.
  • Parrish, R. 2003. Sports law and policy in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Pielke, R. 2013. How can FIFA be held accountable? Sport Management Review 16 (3): 255–67. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2012.12.007
  • Pirson, M. and S. Turnbull. 2018. Decentralized governance structures are able to handle CSR-induced complexity better. Business and Society 57 (5): 929–61. doi:10.1177/0007650316634039
  • Ruggie, J.G. 2016. ‘FOR THE GAME. FOR THE WORLD.’ FIFA and human rights. Corporate Responsibility Initiative Report No 68. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Savic, O., ed. 2002. The politics of human rights. London: Verso.
  • Schmidt, V. 2010. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union Revisited. Input, output, and throughput, KFG Working Paper, 21. 1–32.
  • Schneider, R. 2014. A democratic approach to strategic management in sport organizations. In Handbook of research on strategic management in small and medium enterprises, edited by K. Kildorov and D. Smalbone. Hershey, PA: IGI Global: 305–28.
  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Scott, W.R. 2008. Approaching Adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society 37 (5): 427–42. doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
  • Sharma, A. 2006. Are human rights Western? A contribution to the dialogue of civilizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. American Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  • Sweeney, G., ed. 2016. Transparency international global corruption report: Sport. Abington: Routledge.
  • Sylt, C. 2017. Exclusive: British government begins looking into grants from F1 regulator. Forbes, 14 November. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2017/11/14/exclusive-british-government-begins-looking-into-grants-from-f1-regulator/#437bdbac4c65 (accessed 24 November 2017).
  • Talbot, A. and T.F. Carter. 2016. Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 olympics: Activism and the media. Leisure Studies. doi:10.1080/02614367.2017.1318162
  • THE RULES OF THE GAME. 2001. Conference report and conclusions. Brussels, 26–27 February. Available at https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/basicpage/file/governance_sport.pdf (accessed 22 November 2017).
  • Thiel, A. and J. Mayer. 2009. Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs management: A sociological perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly 9 (1): 81–98. doi:10.1080/16184740802461744
  • Tomlinson, A. 2014. FIFA: The men, the myths, and the money. Abington: Routledge.
  • Tomlinson, A., C. Young, and R. Holt, eds. 2011. Sport and the transformation of modern Europe: States, media and markets 1950–2010. London: Routledge.
  • Washington, M. and K.D.W. Patterson. 2011. Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research. Sport Management Review 14 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003
  • Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Westergren, M. 2016. The political legitimacy of global governance institutions. A justice-based account. Stockholm studies in politics 169. PhD thesis, Stockholm University.
  • Westland, N. 2016. Image-laundering by countries through sports. In Transparency international global corruption report: Sport, edited by G. Sweeney. Routledge: Abington: 73–78.
  • Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zakus, D.W. and J. Skinner. 2008. Modelling organisational change in the international olympic committee. European Sport Management Quarterly 8 (4): 421–42. doi:10.1080/16184740802461660
  • Zeidan, O.S. and S. Fauser. 2015. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility – The case of FIFA. Problems and Perspectives in Management 13 (1–2): 183–92.
  • Zimmermann, A. 2017. Legal status of Israeli football clubs located in the occupied palestinian territory and ensuing legal consequences for FIFA. Available at https://www.diakonia.se/globalassets/documents/ihl/ihl-resources-center/expert-opinions/legal-status-of-israeli-football-clubs-located-in-the-occupied-palestinian-territory-and-ensuing-legal-consequences-for-fifa.pdf (accessed 12 February 2018).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.