https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-8688
References
- ALTER, J. 2004. Yoga in modern India: The body beween science and philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- BANERJEE, P. 2006. Politics of time: “Primitives” and history-writing in a colonial society. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
- BANERJEE, P. 2013. Time and knowledge. In Political science: Volume 3: Indian political thought, edited by S.P.A.V. Pradip Kumar Datta (pp. 28–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- BROAD, W.J. 2012. The science of yoga: The risks and the rewards. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- BRYANT, E.F. 2009. The yoga Sutras of Patanjali. New York: North Point Press.
- CHAKRABARTY, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- FABIAN, J. 2014. Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Sage Publications.
- GIRLING, S. 2019. Love Yoga Anatoy. [Online]. Available at: https://loveyogaanatomy.com (accessed 25 March 2019).
- GOLDBERG, E. 2016. The path of modern yoga - The history of an embodied spiritual practice. Rochester: Inner Traditions.
- JOIS, P. 2010. Mala yoga. New York: North Point Press.
- KPJAY. 2009. Traditional and Guided classes. [Online]. Available at: https://sharathjois.com/the-practice/traditional-method/ (accessed 25 March 2019).
- MICHELIS, E.D. 2005. A history of modern yoga: Pantanjali and Western Esotericism. New York: Continuum.
- NORDEN, B.W.V. 2017. Taking back philosophy: A multicultural manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.
- RÄISÄNEN, P. n.d The eight limb path. [Online]. Available at: https://www.petriandwambui.com/sample-page-2/ (accessed 25 March 2019).
- SINGLETON, M. 2010. Yoga body: The origins of modern posture practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- SPIVAK, G.C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: Towards a history of the vanishing present. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
- STERN, E. 2013. Eddie Sterns Letter to Barry Silver About Moon Days. [Online]. Available at: The dramaturgical frame focusing on the flag is maintained and the national “community” is both embodied and verbally addressed, in way that both stages DGI’s intentions and visions. Though this may not be intentional, that also speaks into a wider, sen. (accessed 30 March 2019).