252
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Dose discordance of direct acting oral anticoagulants using different equations for estimating GFR: a literature review

, &
Pages 857-863 | Received 04 Feb 2020, Accepted 17 Jul 2020, Published online: 27 Jul 2020

References

  • Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, et al. The 2018 European heart rhythm association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(8):1330–1393.
  • Hepburn-Brown M, Darvall J, Hammerschlag G. Acute pulmonary embolism: a concise review of diagnosis and management. Intern Med J. 2019;49(1):15–27.
  • Nimmo C, Wright M, Goldsmith D. Management of atrial fibrillation in chronic kidney disease: double trouble. Am Heart J. 2013;166(2):230–239.
  • Fanikos J, Burnett AE, Mahan CE, et al. Renal function considerations for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2017;130:1015–1023.
  • Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254.
  • Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612.
  • Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
  • Spruill WJ, Wade WE, Iii HHC. Continuing the use of the cockcroft – gault equation for drug dosing in patients with impaired renal function. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(5):468–470.
  • Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, et al. Comparative performance of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(3):486–495.
  • Levey AS, Inker LA. Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in health and disease: a state of the art review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;102(3):405–419.
  • Noormohamed NZ, Gao W, Rizk ML. A systematic review of renal function estimation equations. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2019;5:359–376.
  • Eknoyan G, Lameire N, Eckardt K, et al. KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int (Suppl). 2013;3:1–150.
  • FDA. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function — study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. 2010.
  • European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function (EMA/CHMP/83874/2014). [ cited 2020 July 12]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-evaluation-pharmacokinetics-medicinal-products-patients-decreased-renal-function_en.pdf
  • MacCallum PK, Mathur R, Hull SA, et al. Patient safety and estimation of renal function in patients prescribed new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study. Br Med J. 2013;3:1–7.
  • Kruger PC, Robinson MA, Xu K, et al. Assessing renal function in patients receiving DOACs: cockcroft-gault versus estimated glomerular filtration rate. Thromb Res. 2017;157:165–166.
  • Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–891.
  • Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–1151.
  • Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–992.
  • Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–2104.
  • Parker K, Thachil J. The use of direct oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(2):170–184.
  • Shroff GR. Renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulants. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(4):375–376.
  • Pokorney SD, Peterson ED, Piccini JP. When less is not more. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(23):2791–2793.
  • Moranville MP, Jennings HR. Implications of using modification of diet in renal disease versus Cockcroft-Gault equations for renal dosing adjustments. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(2):154–161.
  • Malavasi VL, Pettorelli D, Fantecchi E, et al. Variations in clinical management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation according to different equations for estimating renal function: post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(7):1059–1067.
  • Andrade JG, Hawkins NM, Fordyce CB, et al. Variability in NOAC dose adjustment in atrial fibrillation patients with renal dysfunction: the influence of renal function estimation formulae. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(8):1010–1018.
  • Manzano-Fernández S, Andreu-Cayuelas JM, Marín F, et al. Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate equations for dosing new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rev Esp Cardiol (English Ed.). 2014;68(6):497–504.
  • Ahlert D, Wynn E, Thomas H. Abstract of “Appropriate DOAC dosing: an evaluation for real world cardiology”. Heart. 2018;104:A28–9.
  • Chen Y-T, Lin H-J. Renal function estimates and dosing of direct oral anticoagulants in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: an observational study. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2018;27(2):39–44.
  • Gerchman F, Tong J, Kristina MU, et al. Superiority of the modification of diet in renal disease equation over the cockcroft-gault equation in screening for impaired kidney function in japanese americans. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77(2):320–326.
  • Lum DOCJ, Azuma S. A comparison of methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate for a population in Hawai’i with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72(9 Suppl 4):27–29.
  • Kucey M, Bolt J, Albers L, et al. Prescribing of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation based on estimation of renal function using standard and modified cockcroft-gault equations: a retrospective analysis. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016;69(5):409–414.
  • Kantorovich A. Renal function and direct oral anticoagulant dose reduction. Am J Med. 2017;130(8):e363.
  • Loo SY, Coulombe J, Dell’Aniello S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants in UK patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: a matched cohort study. BMJ. 2018;8(1):1–9.
  • Chang M, Yu Z, Shenker A, et al. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(5):637–645.
  • January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125–51.
  • Pérez Cabeza AI, Chinchurreta Capote PA, González Correa JA, et al. Discrepancies between the use of MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI equations, instead of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, in the determination of the dosage of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Med Clin (Barc). 2018;150(3):85–91.
  • Seidi M, Patel J, Czuprynska J, et al. Abstract of “Method of renal function estimation influences accuracy of DOAC prescribing.”. Br J Haematol. 2016;POSTER SES:64.
  • Lutz J, Jurk K, Schinzel H. Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with chronic kidney disease: patient selection and special considerations. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017;10:135–143.
  • Helldén A, Odar-Cederlöf I, Nilsson G, et al. Renal function estimations and dose recommendations for dabigatran, gabapentin and valaciclovir: a data simulation study focused on the elderly. BMJ [Internet]. 2013;3 [cited 2020 July 12]. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com
  • Schwartz JB. Potential effect of substituting estimated glomerular filtration rate for estimated creatinine clearance for dosing of direct oral anticoagulants. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(10):1996–2002.
  • Weir MR, Kreutz R. Influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(10):1503–1519.
  • Parasrampuria DA, Truitt KE. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant that Inhibits clotting factor Xa. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(6):641–655.
  • Savaysa [package insert]. Parsippany (NJ): Daiichi Sankyo; 2015;1–35. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/206316s004lbl.pdf
  • Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, Pozzi A, et al. Severity of renal impairment in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: implications for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dose adjustment. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(9):1162–1171.
  • Pokorney SD, Shrader P, Thomas L, et al. Influence of kidney function estimation methods on eligibility for edoxaban population impact of the US food and drug administration’s approach for its product labeling. Circulation. 2016;134(15):1122–1124.
  • Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, et al. Impact of renal function on outcomes with edoxaban in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Circulation. 2016;134(1):24–36.
  • Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, Agostino RBD, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death the framingham heart study. Circulation. 1998;98:946–952.
  • Kiuchi MG. Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease : a bad combination. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018;37(2):103–105.
  • Zeng W, Sun X, Tang K, et al. Risk of thromboembolic event in atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease. Stroke. 2015;183:157–163.
  • Ravera M, Bussalino E, Paoletti E, et al. Haemorragic and thromboembolic risk in CKD patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation: do we need a novel risk score calculator? Int J Cardiol. 2019;274:179–185.
  • Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Verduijn M, et al. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and new CKD- EPI formulas in relation to GFR, age, and body size. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(6):1003–1009.
  • Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD- EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(4):622–627.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.