Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical pharmacological research

References

• Birkett D, Brosen K, Cascorbi I, et al. Clinical pharmacology in research, teaching and health care: considerations by IUPHAR, the International Union of basic and clinical pharmacology. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;107(1):531–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00602.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Dermott SF. Solar System dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy KP. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar V. Data science and prediction. Commun ACM. 2013;56(12):64–73. doi:10.1145/2500499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turing A. I. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. 1950;LIX(236):433–460. doi: 10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M, Johnson K. Classification trees and rule-based models. In: Kuhn M Johnson K, editors. Applied predictive modeling. New York (NY) : Springer; 2013. p. 369–413.
   Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Malkusch S. Interpretation of cluster structures in pain-related phenotype data using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Eur J Pain. 2021;25(2):442–465. doi:10.1002/ejp.1683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933;24(7):498–520. doi:10.1037/h0070888
   Google Scholar
• Pearson KL. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1901;2(11):559–572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720
   Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Lerch F, Djaldetti R, et al. Identification of disease-distinct complex biomarker patterns by means of unsupervised machine-learning using an interactive R toolbox (umatrix). BMC Big Data Analytics. 2018;3(5). doi: 10.1186/s41044-018-0032-1
   Google Scholar
• Ultsch A. Maps for visualization of high-dimensional data spaces. In: Proceedings Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM 2003); Kyushu, Japan; 2003. p. 225–230.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen J Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics. Ed.^(Eds). Berkeley, Calif.; University of California Press; 1967. p. 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhaus H. Sur la division des corps matériels en parties. Bull Acad Polon Sci. 1956;1(804):801.
   Google Scholar
• Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel H-P, et al. Density-based clustering in Spatial databases: the algorithm GDBSCAN and its applications. Data Min Knowl Discov. 1998;2(2):169–194. doi:10.1023/A:1009745219419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative Adversarial Nets. In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, et al., editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2014. Vol. 27. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2014/file/5ca3e9b122f61f8f06494c97b1afccf3-Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW. Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artif Intell Res. 1996;4:237–285. doi:10.1613/jair.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng HH, Luo Y, Cui S, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer. Med Phys. 2017;44(12):6690–6705. doi:10.1002/mp.12625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Dong Y, Liu J, et al. Incorporating causal factors into reinforcement learning for dynamic treatment regimes in HIV. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(Suppl 2):60. doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0755-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5(3):299–314. doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713
   Google Scholar
• R development core team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum G, Drake FL Jr. Python reference manual. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantini D. easyPubMed: Search and retrieve scientific publication records from PubMed. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalchik S. RISmed: Download content from NCBI databases. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fan FY. PubMedWordcloud: ‘pubmed’ word clouds_. R package version 0.3.6. 2019. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PubMedWordcloud
   Google Scholar
• DeJesus Jasmine M, Callanan Maureen A, Solis G, et al. Generic language in scientific communication. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2019;116(37):18370–18377. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817706116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardizzone E, Bonadonna F, Gaglio S, et al. Artificial intelligence techniques for cancer treatment planning. Med Inform (Lond). 1988;13(3):199–210. doi: 10.3109/14639238809010100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(4):281–286. doi:10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(3):105924. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Li P, Ju X, et al. In vivo structural characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome identifies host proteins vulnerable to repurposed drugs. Cell. 2021;184(7):1865–1883.e1820. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D, Feng C, Spitale RC. Measuring RNA structure transcriptome-wide with icSHAPE. Methods. 2017;120:85–90. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand K, Ziebuhr J, Wadhwani P, et al. Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs. Science. 2003;300(5626):1763–1767. doi:10.1126/science.1085658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott L. SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro whole human proteome cleavage prediction and enrichment/depletion analysis. Comput Biol Chem. 2022;98:107671. doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews BW. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta Protein Struct. 1975;405(2):442–451. doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coban MA, Morrison J, Maharjan S, et al. Attacking COVID-19 progression using multi-drug therapy for synergetic target engagement. Biomolecules. 2021;11(6):787. doi: 10.3390/biom11060787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay S, Pieper F, Sachs A, et al. The effects of methylphenidate (ritalin) on the neurophysiology of the monkey caudal prefrontal cortex. eNeuro. 2019;6(1):ENEURO.0371–18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0371-18.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Geisslinger G. Pharmacogenetics of new analgesics. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(3):447–460. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kringel D, Malkusch S, Lötsch J. Drugs and epigenetic molecular functions. A pharmacological data scientometric analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7250. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Kringel D. Use of computational functional genomics in drug discovery and repurposing for analgesic indications. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(6):975–978. doi:10.1002/cpt.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Mustonen L, Harno H, et al. Machine-learning analysis of serum proteomics in neuropathic pain after nerve injury in breast cancer surgery points at chemokine signaling via SIRT2 regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3488. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann C, Kringel D, Ultsch A, et al. Computational functional genomics-based approaches in analgesic drug discovery and repurposing. Pharmacogenomics. 2018;19(9):783–797. doi:10.2217/pgs-2018-0036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1074–d1082. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Knothe C, Lippmann C, et al. Olfactory drug effects approached from human-derived data. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(11):1398–1406. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2015.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Daiker H, Hähner A, et al. Drug-target based cross-sectional analysis of olfactory drug effects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(4):461–471. doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1814-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challa AP, Beam AL, Shen M, et al. Machine learning on drug-specific data to predict small molecule teratogenicity. Reprod Toxicol. 2020;95:148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J Machine Learn Res. 2008;9:2579–2605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Ultsch A. Current projection methods-induced biases at subgroup detection for machine-learning based data-analysis of biomedical data. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21(1):79. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Wang S, Lin W, et al. Computational systems pharmacology-target mapping for fentanyl-laced cocaine overdose. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(8):3486–3499. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falzone L, Salomone S, Libra M. Evolution of cancer pharmacological treatments at the turn of the Third Millennium. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1300. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Pei F, Silverman GA, et al. Mechanisms of action of autophagy modulators dissected by quantitative systems pharmacology analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2855. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaly G, Tallima H, Dabbish E, et al. Anti-cancer peptides: status and future prospects. Molecules. 2023;28(3):1148. doi: 10.3390/molecules28031148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M, Liu D, Yang Y. Anti-cancer peptides: classification, mechanism of action, reconstruction and modification. Open Biol. 2020;10(7):200004. doi:10.1098/rsob.200004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaduangrat N, Nantasenamat C, Prachayasittikul V, et al. Acpred: a computational tool for the prediction and analysis of anticancer peptides. Molecules. 2019;24(10):1973. doi: 10.3390/molecules24101973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C, Pan S, Zhang J, et al. Mitophagy: a novel perspective for insighting into cancer and cancer treatment. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(12):e13327. doi:10.1111/cpr.13327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman Y, Frank J, Lautrup SH, et al. The NAD(+)-mitophagy axis in healthy longevity and in artificial intelligence-based clinical applications. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020;185:111194. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.111194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang EF, Tao J. Targeting on the NAD(+)-mitophagy axis to treat cardiovascular disease. Aging Med (Milton). 2020;3(3):151–152. doi:10.1002/agm2.12123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pampaloni F, Mayer B, Kabat Vel-Job K, et al. A novel cellular spheroid-based autophagy screen applying live fluorescence microscopy identifies nonactin as a strong inducer of autophagosomal turnover. SLAS Discov. 2017;22(5):558–570. doi: 10.1177/2472555217696798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu MC, Liu C, Hu F, et al. Predicting drug-target interactions using probabilistic matrix factorization. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53(12):3399–3409. doi:10.1021/ci400219z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theuretzbacher U, Bush K, Harbarth S, et al. Critical analysis of antibacterial agents in clinical development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(5):286–298. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0340-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr KI. History of antibiotics research. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;398:237–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds DR. Antibiotic resistance: a current epilogue. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;134:139–146. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2016.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Vaisman II, van Hoek ML. Machine learning prediction of antimicrobial peptides. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2405:1–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang G. APD: the Antimicrobial Peptide Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D590–592. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khaledi A, Weimann A, Schniederjans M, et al. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12(3):e10264. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201910264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Su S, Bhatnagar RK, et al. Prediction and analysis of the protein interactome in Pseudomonas aeruginosa to enable network-based drug target selection. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41202. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delcour AH. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1794(5):808–816. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehla J, Malloci G, Mansbach R, et al. Predictive Rules of Efflux Inhibition and Avoidance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio. 2021;12(1). doi: 10.1128/mBio.02785-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Ultsch A. A machine-learned computational functional genomics-based approach to drug classification. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(12):1449–1461. doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2134-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins D. Treemapify: Draw treemaps in ‘ggplot2. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev. 1958;65(6):386–408. doi:10.1037/h0042519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecun Y. A theoretical framework for back-propagation. Touretzky, D, Hinton, G, Sejnowski, T, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann; 1988. p. 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jardim-Perassi BV, Mu W, Huang S, et al. Deep-learning and MR images to target hypoxic habitats with evofosfamide in preclinical models of sarcoma. Theranostics. 2021;11(11):5313–5329. doi: 10.7150/thno.56595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia ZI, Sugrue A, Asirvatham SJ, et al. Noninvasive assessment of dofetilide plasma concentration using a deep learning (neural network) analysis of the surface electrocardiogram: a proof of concept study. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc. Long Beach, California, USA; 2017. p. 6000–6010.
   Google Scholar
• Hakeem H, Feng W, Chen Z, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning model for predicting treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(10):986–996. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belur Nagaraj S, Ramaswamy SM, Weerink MAS, et al. Predicting deep hypnotic state from sleep brain rhythms using deep learning: a data-repurposing approach. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(5):1211–1221. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000004651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho TK. Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (Volume 1) - Volume 1; Montreal, QC, Canada. IEEE; 1995. p. 278. doi: 10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994. INSPEC Accession Number: 5628989.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Bagging Predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24(2):123–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00058655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Kringel D, Ultsch A. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in biomedicine: making AI decisions trustworthy for physicians and patients. BioMedinformatics. 2022;2(1):1–17. doi: 10.3390/biomedinformatics2010001
   Google Scholar
• Streun GL, Steuer AE, Poetzsch SN, et al. Towards a new qualitative screening assay for synthetic cannabinoids using metabolomics and machine learning. Clin Chem. 2022;68(6):848–855. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvac045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Choi AS, Nam H. Drug repositioning of herbal compounds via a machine-learning approach. BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(Suppl 10):247. doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2811-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan K, Verma H, Choudhary S, et al. Identification of kinase inhibitors that rule out the CYP27B1-mediated activation of vitamin D: an integrated machine learning and structure-based drug designing approach. Mol Divers. 2021;25(3):1617–1641. doi:10.1007/s11030-021-10270-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MG, Kim J, Kim SC, et al. Twitter analysis of the nonmedical use and side effects of methylphenidate: machine learning study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16466. doi:10.2196/16466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Clayton EA, Matyunina LV, et al. Machine learning predicts individual cancer patient responses to therapeutic drugs with high accuracy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34753-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chollet F, Allaire JJ. Deep learning with R. NY USA: Manning Publications Co., Shelter Island; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Ultsch A. Comments on the importance of visualizing the distribution of pain-related data. Eur J Pain. 2023;27(7):787–793. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson E, Cutler DM, Leskovec J, et al. An algorithmic approach to reducing unexplained pain disparities in underserved populations. Nat Med. 2021;27(1):136–140. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01192-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–52160. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turek M. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Ser JD, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. 2019.
   Google Scholar