Negotiation Games

REFERENCES

• Aalberg, Toril, Jesper Strömbäck, and Claes H. De Vreese. 2011. “The Framing of Politics as Strategy and Game: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism 13 (2): 162–178. doi:10.1177/1464884911427799.
   Google Scholar
• Aalberts, Chris, and Maarten Molenbeek. 2010. U Draait En U Bent Niet Eerlijk: Spindoctoring in Politiek Den Haag. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Piet, Pieter Broertjes, Ad van Liempt, Marlis Prinzing, and Gerard Smit. 2013. “‘This is not what we agreed’. Negotiating Interview Conditions in Germany and the Netherlands.” Journalism Practice 7 (4): 396–412. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.802475.
   Google Scholar
• Barry-Hirst, Amanda. 2005. PR Power: Inside Secrets from the World of Spin. London: Virgin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. “The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism.” Political Communication 22 (3): 259–276. doi: 10.1080/10584600591006492
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, Jay G., and Stephen Coleman. 2015. “Democracy and the Media—Revisited.” Javnost - The Public 22 (2): 111–128. doi:10.1080/13183222.2015.1041226.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, Claes H. De Vreese, Judith Möller, and Philip Van Praag. 2010. “The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust between Politicians and Journalists.” International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (1): 25–40. doi: 10.1177/1940161209351005
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, and Philip Van Praag. 2005. Politiek En Media in Verwarring : De Verkiezingscampagnes in Het Lange Jaar 2002. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, Marcel, Bas Den Herder, and Birte Schohaus. 2013. “A Question of Power.” Journalism Practice 7 (4): 388–395. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.802474.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Robin. 2011. “Mediatization and News Management.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy Challenging the Primacy of Politics, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 59–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caillois, Roger. 2001. Man, Play and Games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication 52 (4): 749–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 72 (1): 23–41. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200102
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Stephen. 2011. “Representation and Mediated Politics.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy Challenging the Primacy of Politics, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 39–56. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, John. 2000. “Mediated Persona and Political Culture: Dimensions of Structure and Process.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 3 (3): 386–402. doi: 10.1177/136754940000300306
   Google Scholar
• Corner, John, and Dick Pels, eds. 2003. Media and the Restyling of Politics : Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Costera Meijer, Irene. 2005. “Impact or Content?: Ratings vs Quality in Public Broadcasting.” European Journal of Communication 20 (1): 27–53. doi:10.1177/0267323105049632.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron. 2007. The Mediation of Power: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron. 2009. “Journalist–Source Relations, Mediated Reflexivity and ahe Politics of Politics.” Journalism Studies 10 (2): 204–219. doi:10.1080/14616700802580540.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron. 2013. Promotional Cultures. The Rise and Spread of Advertising, Public Relations, Marketing and Branding. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Beus, Jos. 2011. “Audience Democracy: An Emerging Pattern in Postmodern Political Communication.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy. Challenging the Primacy of Politics, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 19–38. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, Yaël, Harmen Groenhart, Ad van Liempt, Niek Hietbrink, Anouk Kragtwijk, Erik Wolters, Freek Diephuis, Jimmy Leenders, Arjanne Aleman, and Tijmen de Groen. 2013. Gerepeteerde Toneelstukjes of Inhoudelijke Verkiezingsstrijd. Een Onderzoek Naar de Onderhandelingen Tussen Politici En Media Tijdens de Nederlandse Verkiezingscampagne van 2012. Utrecht: Hogeschool Utrecht. http://www.journalismlab.nl/publicatie/gerepeteerde-toneelstukjes-of-inhoudelijke-verkiezingsstrijd/.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, Claes H., and Matthijs Elenbaas. 2008. “Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 285–309. doi: 10.1177/1940161208319650
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Jack. 2014. “Foreword.” In De Patatbalie: Do’s and Don’ts van Het Intrigerende Kat- En Muisspel Tussen Media En Politici in Den Haag, edited by Hans Izaak Kriek, 7–12. Uithoorn: Karakter Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 163–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, Andera, and James H. Frey. 2005. “The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed., edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 695–728. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Bob. 2003. “‘A Good Day to Bury Bad News?’: Journalists, Sources and the Packaging of Politics.” In News, Public Relations and Power, edited by Simon Cottle, 45–61. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gaber, Ivor. 2000. “Government by Spin: An Analysis of the Process.” Media, Culture & Society 22 (4): 507–518. doi: 10.1177/016344300022004008
   Google Scholar
• Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding What’s News. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. [1959] 1984. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 8th reprint. Harmondsworth: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein, eds. 2002. Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, Johan. 1955. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, Bernard. 2003. The Wages of Spin. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Nicholas. 1995. Soundbites and Spin Doctors: How Politicians Manipulate the Media - And Vice Versa. London: Cassell Illustrated.
   Google Scholar
• Kee, Peter. 2012. Het Briefje van Bleker: Over Intriges Op Het Binnenhof, Politici, Spindoctors En Pauw & Witteman. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact.
   Google Scholar
• Luyendijk, Joris. 2010. Je Hebt Het Niet van Mij, Maar … : Een Maand Aan Het Binnenhof. Amsterdam: Podium.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, Paolo, and David L. Swanson. 1996. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. First ed. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, David. 2006. Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, Brian. 2004. “PR Must Die: Spin, Anti-spin and Political Public Relations in the UK, 1997–2004.” Journalism Studies 5 (3): 325–338. doi: 10.1080/1461670042000246089
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pels, Dick, and Henk Te Velde. 2000. Politieke stijl: over presentatie en optreden in de politiek. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prenger, Mirjam, Leendert Van der Valk, Frank Van Vree, and Laura Van der Wal. 2011. Gevaarlijk Spel: De Verhouding Tussen PR & Voorlichting En Journalistiek. Studie van Het Stimuleringsfonds Voor de Pers 35. Diemen: AMB.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, Hector. 2006. “The Playful and the Serious: An Approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens.” Game Studies 6 (1). Accessed August 1, 2016. http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges.
   Google Scholar
• Savigny, Heather. 2008. The Problem of Political Marketing. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, Michael. 2011. The Sociology of News. Second ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Timberg, Bernard M., and Robert J. Erler. 2002. Television Talk : A History of the TV Talk Show. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Machiel, Richard Nahuis, and Daniel Waagmeester. 2005. Does Public Service Broadcasting Serve the Public? : The Future of Television in the Changing Media Landscape; Does Public Service Broadcasting Serve the Public? : The Future of Television in the Changing Media Landscape. Discussion Paper. Den Haag: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Van Praag, Philip, and Kees Brants. 2014. Media, Macht En Politiek: De Verkiezingscampagne van 2012. Diemen: AMB.
   Google Scholar
• Van Weezel, Max. 2011. Haagse Fluisteraars. Amsterdam: Balans.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, Liesbet, Stephen Coleman, and Anke Kuik. 2011. “The Elephant Trap: Politicians Performing in Television Comedy.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy Challenging the Primacy of Politics, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 146–163. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, Liesbet, and Christina Holtz-Bacha. 2000. “Personalisation in Dutch and German Politics: The Case of Talk Show.” Javnost-The Public 7 (2): 45–56. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2000.11008743
   Google Scholar
• Voltmer, Katrin, and Kees Brants. 2011. “A Question of Control: Journalists and Politcians in Political Broadcast Interviews.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy Challenging the Primacy of Politics, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 126–145. Basingstroke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Carol A. B. 2002. “Qualitative Interviewing.” In Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method, edited by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, 83–102. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. “Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue.” Discourse & Society 9 (3): 387–412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
   Google Scholar
• Wijfjes, Huub. 2009. VARA : Biografie van Een Omroep. Amsterdam: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Wijfjes, Huub, and Gerrit Voerman. 2009. Mediatization of Politics in History. Vol. ol. 35. Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Yaxley, Heather, and Alison Theaker. 2011. The Public Relations Handbook. 4 ed. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar