The Inapplicability of Objectivity: Understanding the Work of Data Journalism

References

• Anderson, C. 2008. “The End of Theory.” Wired. Accessed 1 April 2019. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/#.
   Google Scholar
• Bavadam, L. 2010. “Environment Stories, among the Most Challenging.” In The Green Pen: Environmental Journalism in India and South Asia, edited by K. Acharya and F. Noronha, 3–11. New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. 1998. “The Truth is Our Currency.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 3: 102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, G. R., and J. A. Schwarz. 2015. “Heuristics of the Algorithm: Big Data, User Interpretation and Institutional Translation.” Big Data & Society 2 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951715608406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2010. The Promise and Peril of Big Data. Washington: The ASPEN INSTITUTE.
   Google Scholar
• Borges-Rey, E. 2016. “Unravelling Data Journalism.” Journalism Practice 10: 833–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudana, S. 2011. “A Definition of Journalistic Objectivity as a Performance.” Media Culture & Society 33: 385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information, Communication & Society 15: 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., and J. M. Boykoff. 2007. “Climate Change and Journalistic Norms: A Case-Study of US Mass-Media Coverage.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 38: 1190–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P. 2014. “Data Journalism.” In Ethics for Digital Journalists: Emerging Best Practices, edited by L. Zion and D. Craig, 202–220. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brewin, M. W. 2013. “A Short History of the History of Objectivity.” The Communication Review 16: 211–229.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. 2015. “Rethinking Big Data in Digital Humanitarianism: Practices, Epistemologies, and Social Relations.” GeoJournal 80: 477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2007. “Blogs and Journalistic Authority: The Role of Blogs in US Election Day 2004 Coverage.” Journalism Studies 8: 264–279.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2019. “News Algorithms, Photojournalism and the Assumption of Mechanical Objectivity in Journalism.” Digital Journalism 7 (8): 1117–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., and J. Young, eds. 1973. The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Cushion, S., J. Lewis, and R. Callaghan. 2017. “Data Journalism, Impartiality and Statistical Claims.” Journalism Practice 11: 1198–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. 2015. “Algorithmic Accountability.” Digital Journalism 3: 398–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W., and B. Klett. 1993. “Subjective Objectivity. How Journalists in Four Countries Define a Key Term of Their Profession.” Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands) 51: 53–83.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, P. 2018. “How We Carried Out Our Survey of Flatshare Bias.” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, J., and T. Glasser. 1987. “On the Epistemology of Investigative Journalism.” In Mass Communication Review Yearbook, edited by M. Gurevitch and M. R. Ley, 1–20. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, J., and T. Glasser. 1998. Custodians of Conscience. Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. 1980. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, G. 1993. “In Defence of a Supposedly Outdated Notion: The Range of Application of Journalistic Objectivity.” Canadian Journal of Communication 18. https://cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/778/684.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies. Paths Forward in Social Research, edited by T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot, 167–194. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, T., and J. Ettema. 1989. “Investigative Journalism and the Moral Order.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, P. 2017. “From Computer-assisted to Data-driven: Journalism and Big Data.” Journalism 18 (4): 408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, M. 2008. “The ‘Objectivity’ Ideal and its Limitations in 20th-century British Journalism.” Journalism Studies 9: 477–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F. 2014. Lifestyle Journalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., and J. Renken. 2018. “Data Justice for Development: What Would It Mean?” Information Development 34: 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmueller, L., T. P. Vos, and M. A. Poepsel. 2013. “Shifting Journalistic Capital?” Journalism Studies 14: 287–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. 2014. “From Open Data to Information Justice.” Ethics and Information Technology 16: 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2016. “The Question of Information Justice.” Communications of the ACM 59: 27–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. 1968. “Choice in Classification: The Subjectivity of Objective Methods.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 58: 575–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, J., and E. Stavelin. 2014. “Computational Journalism in Norwegian Newsrooms.” Journalism Practice 8: 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kiel, P., and A. Waldman. 2015. “How We Analyzed Racial Disparity in Debt Collection Lawsuits: An Explanation of How We Analyzed Whether Debt Collection Lawsuits Disproportionately Impact Black Communities.” ProPublic. Accessed 1 April 2019. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-racial-disparity-in-debt-collection-lawsuits.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, A. 2016. Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data Driven Design. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J., S. Mattu, L. Kirchner, and J. Angwin. 2016. “How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm.” ProPublica. Accessed 1 April 2019. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm.
   Google Scholar
• Lesage, F., and R. A. Hackett. 2014. “Between Objectivity and Openness-the Mediality of Data for Journalism.” Media and Communication 2: 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C. 2012. “The Tension Between Professional Control and Open Participation: Journalism and its Boundaries.” Information, Communication & Society 15: 836–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J. 1996. “In Defence of Objectivity Revisited.” In Mass Media and Society, edited by J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 238–254. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, R. L., and J. C. Merrill. 1990. Macromedia: Mission, Message and Morality. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2013. “Digital Sociology: Beyond the Digital to the Sociological.” In The Australian Sociological Association 2013 Conference Proceedings: Reflections, Intersections and Aspirations, 50 Years of Australian Sociology, edited by N. Osbaldiston, C. Strong, and H. Forbes-Mewett. Melbourne: TASA. http://www.tasa.org.au/tasa-members/2013-conference-papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2012. “Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. Gold, 460–475. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, S. 2013. Objectivity in Journalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Mcluhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mcquail, D. 1992. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mcquail, D. 1994. Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. C. 1984. “Journalistic Objectivity is not Possible.” In Basic Issues in Mass Communication, edited by J. C. Merrill and E. Dennis, 103–110. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. C. 1990. “Semantics and Objectivity.” In Macromedia: Mission, Message, and Morality, edited by R. L. Lowenstein and J. C. Merrill, 266–276. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, D. 1995. Public Journalism and Public Life: Why Telling the News is Not Enough. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. 1991. Precision Journalism: A Reporter’s Introduction to Social Science Methods. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mindich, D. 2000. Just the Facts: How Objectivity Came to Define American Journalism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., and M. Lester. 1974. “News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals.” American Sociological Review 39: 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasie, S. 2015. “Data-Driven Revelation?” Digital Journalism 3: 364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasie, S., and E. Dagiral. 2012. “Data-driven Journalism and the Public Good: ‘Computer-assisted-reporters’ and ‘Programmer-journalists’ in Chicago.” New Media & Society 15: 853–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, G. P., and T. P. Vos. 2018. “The GamerGate Controversy and Journalistic Paradigm Maintenance.” Journalism 19: 553–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, S. J., and J. M. Tanur. 2012. The Subjectivity of Scientists and the Bayesian Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rupar, V. 2006. “How Did You Find That Out? Transparency of the newsgathering Process and the Meaning of News.” Journalism Studies 7: 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E. 2012. “The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices.” Theory, Culture & Society 29: 116–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., E. Isin, and D. Bigo. 2017. “Data Politics.” Big Data & Society 4 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951717717749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2001. “Journalistic Ethics, Objectivity, Existential Journalism, Standpoint Epistemology, and Public Journalism.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16: 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1989. “The Sociology of News Production.” Media, Culture & Society 11: 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 2: 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan Burns, L., and B. J. Matthews. 2018. “First Things First: Teaching Data Journalism as a Core Skill.” Asia Pacific Media Educator 28: 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., E. Albæk, P. Bro, and C. D. Vreese. 2013. “A Reality Check: How Journalists’ Role Perceptions Impact Their Implementation of the Objectivity Norm.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 14: 22–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., and S.-K. Oh. 2017. “Small Departures, Big Continuities?” Journalism Studies 18: 997–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2017. “What is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally.” Big Data & Society 4 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951717736335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. J. 2016. “In Defense of Journalistic Paternalism.” Journal of Media Ethics 31: 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. J. 2017. “Helpfulness as Journalism’s Normative Anchor.” Journalism Studies 20 (3): 364–380.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, J. 2015. “Being Objective with a Personal Perspective How Environmental Journalists at Two Chinese Newspapers Articulate and Practice Objectivity.” Science Communication 37: 747–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. 1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity.” American Journal of Sociology 77: 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. 1978. Making News. A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, A., and P. Kiel. 2015. Racial Disparity in Debt Collection Lawsuits: A Study of Three Metro Areas. October 8, 2015 ed.: ProPublica.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2005. “Links and Power: The Political Economy of Linking on the Web.” Library Trends 53: 524–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, M. M. 2010. “The Politics of the Data.” International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 3: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Westerståhl, J. 1983. “Objective News Reporting: General Premises.” Communication Research 10: 403–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2014. “Tidy Data.” Journal of Statistical Software 59: 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarsky, T. 2016. “The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41: 118–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. I. 2014. “Chinese-style Pragmatic Objectivity in War Reporting.” Asian Journal of Communication 25 (2): 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar