Inventive Factfinders: Investigative Journalism as Professional Self-representation, Marker of Identity and Boundary Work

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, G., E. O. Arntsen, and C. Quist. 2018. Addictologi-avsløringen. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. 2008. “Expertise, Authority, and Power in Democratic Life.” In The Media and Social Theory, Vol. 1, edited by D. Hesmondhalgh, and J. Toynbee, 248. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. 2013. “What Aggregators Do: Towards a Networked Concept of Journalistic Expertise in the Digital Age.” Journalism 14 (8): 1008–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W., and J. De Maeyer. 2015. “Objects of Journalism and the News.” Journalism 16 (1): 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W., and M. Schudson. 2020. “Objectivity, Professionalism, and Truth Seeking.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 2nd ed., edited by K. Wahl-Jorgensen, and T. Hanitzsch, 136–150. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, J. 2005. The Evolution of American Investigative Journalism. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benesch, S. 1998. “The Rise of Solutions Journalism.” Columbia Journalism Review 36 (6): 36.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D. A. 2009. “Reporters and Their Sources.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 1st ed., edited by K. Wahl-Jorgensen, and T. Hanitzsch, 102–115. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. 1999. “From Behind the Walls: Boundary Work by News Organizations in Their Coverage of Princess Diana’s Death.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 23 (1): 90–112.
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, K., and G. Bergström. 2017. Analyzing Text and Discourse: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2005. “The Political Field, the Social Science Field, and the Journalistic Field.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Vol. 29, edited by R. Benson, and E. Neveu, 29–47. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, F. 2004. “Metoderapportens ABC.” SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., B. Den Herder, and B. Schohaus. 2013. “A Question of Power: The Changing Dynamics Between Journalists and Sources.” Journalism Practice 7 (4): 388–395.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, M. 2008. “Investigative Journalism and Scholarship.” In Investigative Journalism, 2nd ed., edited by H. de Burgh, 174–188. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2016. “Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation.” Communication Theory 26 (4): 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2017. Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., and S. C. Lewis. 2015. Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., and S. C. Lewis. 2020. “Boundary Work.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 2nd ed., edited by K. Wahl-Jorgensen, and T. Hanitzsch, 123–136. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr Ekroll, H., and C. A. Dahl. 2018. Stortingsregnskapene. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2012. “Defending a Paradigm by Patrolling a Boundary: Two Global Newspapers’ Approach to WikiLeaks.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (3): 377–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Burgh, H. 2008. Investigative Journalism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M. 2002. “Epistemologies of TV Journalism: A Theoretical Framework.” Journalism 3 (3): 259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., and O. Westlund. 2019. “Epistemology and Journalism.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.806.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, J. S., and T. L. Glasser. 1985. “On the Epistemology of Investigative Journalism.” Communication 8 (2): 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, J. S., and T. L. Glasser. 1988. “Narrative Form and Moral Force - the Realization of Innocence and Guilt through Investigative Journalism.” Journal of Communication 38 (3): 8–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1988.tb02057.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettema, J. S., and T. L. Glasser. 1989. “Investigative Journalism and the Moral Order.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6 (1): 1–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038909366728.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, J. S., and T. L. Glasser. 1998. Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M. 2006. “A Muckraking Model: Investigative Reporting Cycles in American History.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11 (2): 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M. 2007. “Dummies and Ventriloquists: Models of How Sources Set the Investigative Agenda.” Journalism 8 (5): 499–509.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, M. 1980. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, I., T. Aarøy, and A. G. Eriksen. 2018. Fengselets fengsel: de glemte menneskene. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich, E. 2009. “In Defense of Textual Analysis: Restoring a Challenged Method for Journalism and Media Studies.” Journalism Studies 10 (2): 238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuly, J. G., A. Mauren, T. Olsen, and H. O. Torgersen. 2018. De ulovlige pokerklubbene. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. 1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. 1st ed. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gjernes, K., K. Sæter, and L. K. Solem. 2018. Boligkuppet. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Godler, Y., and Z. Reich. 2017. “Journalistic Evidence: Cross-Verification as a Constituent of Mediated Knowledge.” Journalism 18 (5): 558–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godler, Y., Z. Reich, and B. Miller. 2020. “Social Epistemology as a New Paradigm for Journalism and Media Studies.” New Media & Society 22 (2): 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., B. Lindgren, and B. Lundman. 2017. “Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper.” Nurse Education Today 56: 29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., and T. P. Vos. 2017. “Journalistic Roles and the Struggle Over Institutional Identity: The Discursive Constitution of Journalism.” Communication Theory 27 (2): 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstad, G., E. Rasmussen, A. Ødegaard, M. Bardal, J. Nilsson, and I. Meisingset. 2018. Møllenberg til leie. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Hovden, J. F. 2008. Profane and Sacred. A Study of the Norwegian Journalistic Field. Bergen: The University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., and L. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsrød, M. G. 2018. Mirakel-predikantene. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, E., and C. Bentzrud. 2018. Jenten på broen. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanosga, G., and J. Martin. 2018. “Journalists, Sources, and Policy Outcomes: Insights from Three-Plus Decades of Investigative Reporting Contest Entries.” Journalism 19 (12): 1676–1693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916683555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C. 2011. “The Sociology of Professions, Boundary Work, and Participation in Journalism: A Review of the Literature.” Paper presented at the 2011 International Communication Association Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C. 2015. “Epilogue: Studying the Boundaries of Journalism: Where do we go from Here?” In Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation, edited by M. Carlson and S. C. Lewis, 218–228. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., and O. Westlund. 2015. “Big Data and Journalism: Epistemology, Expertise, Economics, and Ethics.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 447–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieblich, A., R. Tuval-Mashiach, and T. Zilber. 1998. Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation, Vol. 47. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lied, H., T. Furuly, and T. Antonsen. 2018. Jakten på edderkoppen. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M. 2015. Journalistikkens autoritet. Yrkesideologi og autoritetsmarkering i norsk journalistikk 1954-2014. Oslo: Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey, W. 2006. “Mapping the Journalism–Blogging Relationship.” Journalism 7 (4): 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgaard, H., and T. Strøm. 2018. Den store forskningsbløffen. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Maares, P., and F. Hanusch. 2020. “Exploring the Boundaries of Journalism: Instagram Micro-Bloggers in the Twilight Zone of Lifestyle Journalism.” Journalism 21 (2): 262–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFadyen, G. 2008. "The Practices of Investigative Journalism". In Investigative Journalism. 2nd ed., edited by H. de Burgh, 138–156. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. 2002. Precision Journalism: A Reporter’s Introduction to Social Science Methods. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Moland, A., and I. R. Hjorten. 2018. Selvmord i psykiatrien. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Mottier, V. 2000. “Narratives of National Identity: Sexuality, Race, and the Swiss” Dream of Order.” Revue suisse de sociologie 26 (3): 533–558.
   Google Scholar
• Örnebring, H. 2010. “Technology and Journalism-as-Labour: Historical Perspectives.” Journalism 11 (1): 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Örnebring, H. 2013. “Anything You Can do, I Can do Better? Professional Journalists on Citizen Journalism in Six European Countries.” International Communication Gazette 75 (1): 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örnebring, H. (2016). Epistemologies and Professional Roles. In Journalistic Role Performance: Concepts, Contexts, and Methods, edited by C. Mellado, L. Hellmueller, W. Donsbach, 93–107. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosen, R. 1996. Fra fjærpenn Til Internett: journalister i organisasjon og samfunn. Oslo: Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Parasie, S. 2015. “Data-driven Revelation? Epistemological Tensions in Investigative Journalism in the Age of “Big Data”.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R. E. 1940. “News as a Form of Knowledge: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 45 (5): 669–686.
   Google Scholar
• Protess, D. L., F. L. Cook, J. Doppelt, J. S. Ettema, M. T. Gordon, D. R. Leff, and P. Miller. 1991. The Journalism of Outrage: Investigative Reporting and Agenda Building in America. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Z. 2009. Sourcing the News: Key Issues in Journalism–an Innovative Study of the Israeli Press. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revers, M. 2014. “The Twitterization of News Making: Transparency and Journalistic Professionalism.” Journal of Communication 64 (5): 806–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. 2017. “Narrative Analysis.” In Analyzing Text and Discourse: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences, edited by K. Boréus and G. Bergström, 122–145. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. 1987. Putting “Reality” Together: BBC News. London and New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1992. “Watergate: A Study in Mythology.” Columbia Journalism Review 31 (1): 28.
   Google Scholar
• Seglem, E., E. Skarsaune, T. G. Tollaksen, and H. Øvrebekk. 2018. Goliat - kjempen som ikke kunne falle. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Skille, ØB, O. Døvik, S. Hansen, H. Lied, and H. Moltke. 2018. Antennene i skogen. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• SKUP-organization. 2020. “Reglene for innsending av metoderapport”. SKUP: skup.no
   Google Scholar
• Stetka, V., and H. Örnebring. 2013. “Investigative Journalism in Central and Eastern Europe: Autonomy, Business Models, and Democratic Roles.” International Journal of Press-Politics 18 (4): 413–435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213495921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømme, E. S. 2020. “Hva Forteller SKUP-Rapportene om Norsk Gravejournalistikk?” Norsk Medietidsskrift 27 (2): 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.0805-9535-2020-02-04.
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc Jr., E. C., and J. Jenkins. 2018. “Out of Bounds? How Gawker’s Outing a Married Man Fits Into the Boundaries of Journalism.” New Media & Society 20 (2): 581–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorenfeldt, G., E. Sandli, T. W. Christiansen, A. Fjellberg, M. Krasnowolski, and T. Krokfjord. 2018. Kodenavn: IGOR. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen, E.. 2019. “Surveillance of Journalists/Encryption Issues.” In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0272.
   Google Scholar
• Tobiassen, M., and K. Sæter. 2018. Tidal-saken. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelstad, B., and R. Berg. 2018. Gjengen som ingen klarte å stoppe. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. 1978. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venli, V., M. Landsend, S. Gedde-Dahl, E. F. Flydal, O. Strømman, and R. Jarlsbo. 2018. Konkursgjengangerne. SKUP: skup.no.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2014. “Is WikiLeaks Challenging the Paradigm of Journalism? Boundary Work and Beyond.” International Journal of Communication 8 (12): 2581–2592.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2015. “Resisting Epistemologies of User-Generated Content? Cooptation, Segregation and the Boundaries of journalism”. In Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation, edited by M. Carlson and S. C. Lewis, 169–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America: News, Accountability, and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 1992. Covering the Body: The Kennedy Assassination, the Media, and the Shaping of Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar