The Values of Print: Affordances and Sensemaking for Newspaper Consumers

References

• Barnhurst, K. G., and J. Nerone. 2002. “The Form of News: Thoughts on the Newspaper as Environment.” Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association 3: 26. http://www.media-ecology.org/publications/MEA_proceedings/v3/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J., J. Delin, and R. Henschel. 2007. “Mapping the Multimodal Genres of Traditional and Electronic Newspapers.” In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, edited by T. Royce, and W. Bowcher, 147–172. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Björneborn, L. 2017. “Three Key Affordances for Serendipity: Toward a Framework Connecting Environmental and Personal Factors in Serendipitous Encounters.” Journal of Documentation 73 (5): 1053–1081. doi:10.1108/JD-07-2016-0097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, R. W., G. J. Keir, and N. Kang. 1983. “Newspaper Use and Gratification in Hawaii.” Newspaper Research Journal 4 (4): 43–52. doi:10.1177/073953298300400405.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, H. 2016. “The Time(s) of News Websites.” In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by B. Franklin, and S. Eldridge, 55–63. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, C., and P. Neale. 2006. “Conducting In-Depth Interview: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2.” http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., and A. Helmond. 2018. “The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, edited by J. Burgess, A. Marwick, and T. Poell, 233–253. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P., and R. B. Affe. 2006. “The Contributions of Net News to Cyber Democracy: Civic Affordances of Major Metropolitan Newspaper Sites.” In Internet Newspapers: Making of a Mainstream Medium, edited by Li, X, 227–242. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Innovation & Sustainability in Local Media (CISLM). 2020. UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Accessed November 27, 2020, from https://www.cislm.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. 2003. “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 181–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M., P. S. Chen, C. W. Chang, and Z. Abedin. 2017. “News Video Quality Affects Online Sites’ Credibility, News Video Quality Affects Online Sites’ Credibility.” Newspaper Research Journal 38 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1177/0739532917696087.
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I., and M. J. Yang. 2009. “Is Online News an Inferior Good? Examining the Economic Nature of Online News Among Users.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86: 594–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. G., and T. Chambers. 2011. “How Production Value Impacts. Perceived Technical Quality, Credibility, and Economic Value of Video News.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 88: 737–752. doi:10.1177/107769901108800404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambra, J., C. S. Wilson, and S. Akter. 2019. “Affordance Theory and E-Books: Evaluating the E-Reading Experience Using Netnography.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 23: 873–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. 1998. “Sense-Making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use.” Journal of Knowledge Management; Kempston 2 (2): 36–46. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmick, J., Y. Chen, and Z. Li. 2004. “Competition Between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension.” The Journal of Media Economics 17 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1207/s15327736me1701_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, B. 2000. “Diffusion of a New Technology: On-Line Research in Newspaper Newsrooms.” Convergence 6 (1): 84–105. doi:10.1177/135485650000600109.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, edited by R. Shaw, and J. Bransford, 67–82. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L. 2007. “The Affordances of Blogging: A Case Study in Culture and Technological Effects.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 31 (4): 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B., A. Furnham, and S. Griffiths. 2000. “Children’s Memory for News: A Comparison of Three Presentation Media.” Media Psychology 2 (2): 93–118. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0202_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R. 2003. “Cognitive, Physical, Sensory, and Functional Affordances in Interaction Design.” Behaviour & Information Technology 22 (5): 315–338. doi:10.1080/01449290310001592587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollan, J., E. Hutchins, and D. Kirsh. 2000. “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7 (2): 174–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, R., and J. Niederdeppe. 2008. “Information Scanning.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci026.
   Google Scholar
• Ketterer, S., J. McGuire, and R. Murray. 2019. “The Price of Outsourcing: A Content Analysis of the Effects of Early Deadlines on the Sports Section in The Oklahoman.” Newspaper Research Journal 40 (1): 51–68. doi:10.1177/0739532919836154.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., N. Sharma, D. L. Hansen, and S. Alter. 2005. “Impact of Popularity Indications on Readers' Selective Exposure to Online News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49 (3): 296–313. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Langeveld, M. 2008, November 18. “News After Newspapers: The Bottom Line: How it Fares When You Nuke Your Newspaper.” News after Newspapers. https://newsafternewspapers.blogspot.com/2008/11/bottom-line-how-it-fares-when-you-nuke.html.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. D., and R. J. Martins. 2018. “Outsourced Credibility?” Journalism Studies 19 (2): 247–267. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1178594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A. 2013. The Magazine Industry is Becoming Mobile. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=grcsp.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, I. C., and T. G. Kormelink. 2018. “Audiences for Journalism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited by T. Vos, and Hanusch, 1–7. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1993. “Psychology and Information.” ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation 17 (3): 3–6. doi:10.1145/165552.165556.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., and G. Neff. 2015. “Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory.” Social Media + Society 1 (2), doi:10.1177/2056305115603385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday Business.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design.” Interactions 6 (3): 38–43. http://beyondbitsandatoms.org/readings/norman1999affordance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, J., L. Fortunati, S. Taipale, and K. Barnhurst. 2017. “Innovators and Innovated: Newspapers and the Postdigital Future Beyond the Death of Print.” The Information Society 33 (2): 86–95. doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1289488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. October 14, 2019. Trends and Facts on Newspapers. https://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/newspapers/.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. 1992. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., S. K. Evans, K. E. Pearce, A. Sivunen, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017. “Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media Use.” Journal of Communication 67 (1): 106–130. doi:10.1111/jcom.12273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., and M. Neiger. 2018. “Temporal Affordances in the News.” Journalism 19 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1177/1464884916689152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., and P. M. Leonardi. 2013. “Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association.” Annals of the International Communication Association 36 (1): 143–189. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130.
   Google Scholar
• Uexküll, J. 1920. “Kompositionslehre der Natur: Biologie als Undogmatsche Naturwissenschaft.” In Ausgewählte Schriften, edited by T. von Uexküll, 323–327. Berlin: Propyläen-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vaast, E., and E. Kaganer. 2013. “Social Media Affordances and Governance in the Workplace: An Examination of Organizational Policies.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (1): 78–101. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, M. W., and A. Dillon. 2006. “Why Structure and Genre Matter for Users of Digital Information: A Longitudinal Experiment with Readers of a Web-Based Newspaper.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (6): 502–526. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K., K. M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld. 2005. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., and D. Sloan. 2015. Research Methods in Communication. Northport: Vision Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. 1986. “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1940–1920.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 53–111.
   Google Scholar