Guided by the Grid: Raising Attention with the Rule of Thirds

References

• Amirshahi, S. A., G. U. Hayn-Leichsenring, J. Denzler, and C. Redies. 2014. “Evaluating the Rule of Thirds in Photographs and Paintings.” Art & Perception 2: 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Barnhurst, K. 1993. “The First Exercise: What It Teaches About Photojournalism Practice.” The Journalism Educator 48 (2): 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. 2006. “Valence is a Basic Building Block of Emotional Life.” Journal of Research in Personality 40 (1): 35–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. M. 2005. “Perception Theory.” In Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media, edited by K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, and K. Kenney, 45–62. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associcates.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M. 2019. “Audience Engagement.” In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited by T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, A. Sehl, D. Dimitrakopoulou, and M. Geertsema-Sligh, 1–6. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., R. Rosenthal, R. A. Eisenstat, P. L. Rogers, and S. Finkelstein. 1978. “Decoding Discrepant Nonverbal Cues.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (3): 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Dio, C., E. Macaluso, and G. Rizzolatti. 2007. “The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures.” Plos One 2 (11), e1201: 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., and L. F. Barrett. 2007. “Affect Is a Form of Cognition: A Neurobiological Analysis.” Cognition & Emotion 21 (6): 1184–1211. doi:10.1080/02699930701437931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensenberger, P. 2011. Focus on Composing Photos. Burlington: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geise, S., A. Heck, and D. Panke. 2020. “The Effects of Digital Media Images on Political Participation Online: Results of an Eye-Tracking Experiment Integrating Individual Perceptions of ‘Photo News Factors’.” Policy & Internet 13 (1): 54–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., and E. P. Bucy. 2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. 1996. “Say It with Pictures.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546: 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, K., and J. Jenkins. 2015. “Visual Framing of the Syrian Conflict in News and Public Affairs Magazines.” Journalism Studies 16 (2): 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, K., and R. J. Thomas. 2015. “Locating the Journalism in Citizen Photojournalism: The use and Content of Citizen-Generated Imagery.” Digital Journalism 3 (4): 615–633. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1034528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, E., K. Davison, S. Shreve, T. Davis, E. Bettendorf, and A. Nair. 2006. “Bridging Newsrooms and Classrooms: Preparing the Next Generation of Journalists for Converged Media.” Journalism & Communication Monographs 8: 221–262.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, P., and M. Jeannerod. 2003. Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, T. H., and R. I. Dunbar. 1997. “Visual and Socio–Cognitive Information Processing in Primate Brain Evolution.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264: 1303–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., and A. Pear. 2016. “The Rise of Visual Content Online.” MIT Sloan Management Review, January 4. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-rise-of-visual-content-online/.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L. 1974. Sight and Mind: An Introduction to Visual Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R. D., P. M.-L. Chua, and R. J. Dolan. 1999. “Common Effects of Emotional Valence, Arousal and Attention on Neural Activation During Visual Processing of Pictures.” Neuropsychologia 37 (9): 989–997. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, L., and S. Cottle. 2009. “Visualizing Climate Change: Television News and Ecological Citizenship.” International Journal of Communication 3: 920–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhead, G. 1989. “Category Bounds and Stimulus Variability.” In Object Perception: Structure and Process, edited by B. E. Shepp and S. Ballesteros, 267–295. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, R. G. 2007. Statistical Concepts: A Second Course of Education and the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, L., H. Le, Y. Niu, and F. Liu. 2011. Rule of Thirds Detection from Photograph. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (pp. 91–96). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Maleš, M., A. Heđi, and M. Grgić. 2012. Compositional Rule of Thirds Detection. In Proceedings ELMAR-2012, 41–44, September. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. 2000. “Vision.” In Minds, Brains, and Computers: The Foundations of Cognitive Science: An Anthology, edited by R. Cummins and D. D. Cummins, 69–83. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, M., and E. Newton. 2012. Digital Training Comes of Age: How Knight Journalism Fellows and Trainees benefit – and Why They Want Even More. http://www.knightfoundation.org/media/uploads/publication_pdfs/KFTrainingFieldReportWEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. A., C. M. Leclerc, and E. A. Kensinger. 2014. “Effects of Valence and Divided Attention on Cognitive Reappraisal Processes.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9 (12): 1952–1961. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, T. M. 2014. “Blurry and Centered or Clear and Balanced?” Journalism Practice 8 (6): 704–725. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.892703.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., and B. Myors. 2008. Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N. 2016. Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., and I. Wadbring. 2015. “Not Good Enough?” Journalism Practice 9 (4): 484–501. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1030135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, T., S. S. Psyche, T. Deb, A. Firoze, and R. M. Rahman. 2019. “An Algorithmic Approach to Estimate Cognitive Aesthetics of Images Relative to Ground Truth of Human Psychology Through a Large User Study.” Journal of Information and Telecommunication 3 (2): 156–179. doi:10.1080/24751839.2018.1542574.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. 1989. “Reference Frames in the Perception of Shape and Orientation.” In Object Perception: Structure and Process, edited by B. E. Shepp and S. Ballestero, 121–163. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, G., G. Edgar, and H. Edgar. 2012. “Perception.” In Cognitive Psychology, edited by N. Braisby and A. Gellatly, 65–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1985. Visual Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. 1998. “Visual Indexes in Spatial Vision and Imagery.” In Visual Attention, edited by R. D. Wright, 215–231. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2003. Seeing and Visualizing: It’s not What you Think. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. 2011. Networked: A Contemporary History of News in Transition. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J. 2010. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig, M. 2005. “A Case for the Visual Elite.” Visual Communication Quarterly 12 (3/4): 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, N., R. Arya, and R. K. Agrawal. 2017. “A Novel Position Prior Using Fusion of Rule of Thirds and Image Center for Salient Object Detection.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 76 (8): 10521–10538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. T. 1797. Remarks on Rural Scenery. London, UK: Nathaniel Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanucci, J. K. 2010. “Emotional High: Emotions and the Perception of Spatial Layout.” In Social Psychology of Visual Perception, edited by E. Balcetis and G. D. Lassiter, 273–297. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, K. 2011. Photo 1: An Introduction to the Art of Photography. Clifton Park: Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., and B. Weaver. 1998. “The Medium of Attention: Location-Based, Object-Centered, Scene-Based?” In Visual Attention, edited by R. D. Wright, 77–107. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. 1973. “On Peripheral and Central Processes in Vision: Inferences from an Information-Processing Analysis of Masking with Patterned Stimuli.” Psychological Review 80 (1): 1–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, W. R. 1988. On Seeing Forms. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, W. R. 1998. Toward a New Behaviorism: The Case Against Perceptual Reductionism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Haak, B., M. Parks, and M. Castells. 2012. “The Future of Journalism: Networked Journalism.” International Journal of Communication 6: 2923–2938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heide, B., J. D. D’Angelo, and E. M. Schumaker. 2012. “The Effects of Verbal Versus Photographic Self-Presentation on Impression Formation in Facebook.” Journal of Communication 62 (1): 98–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2005. “Cognitive Theory.” In Handbook of Visual Communication Research: Theory, Methods, and Media, edited by K. Smith, S. Moriarity, G. Barbatis, and K. Kenney, 193–210. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yegiyan, N. S., and A. Lang. 2010. “Processing Central and Peripheral Detail: How Content Arousal and Emotional Tone Influence Encoding.” Media Psychology 13 (1): 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinchenko, V. P. 1975. “Problems of Visual Culture in the Light of Modern Investigations of Visual Perception and Visual Thinking.” Russian Social Science Review 16 (2): 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zusne, L. 1970. Visual Perception of Form. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar