Conversational Gatekeeping—Social Interactional Practices of Post-Publication Gatekeeping on Newspapers’ Facebook Pages

References

• Abbott, Eric A., and Lyn T Brassfield. 1989. “Comparing Decisions on Releases by TV and Newspaper Gatekeepers.” Journalism Quarterly 66: 853–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahva, Laura, and Steen Steensen. 2020. “Journalism Theory.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies (Second Edition: ICA Handbook Series), edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 38–54. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli. 2016. “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (4): 290–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, Dan. 1990. “Refining the Gatekeeping Metaphor for Local Television News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34 (1): 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleske, Glen L. 1991. “Ms. Gates Takes Over: An Updated Version of a 1949 Case Study.” Newspaper Research Journal 12 (3): 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Joshua. 2019. The Facebook Algorithm Explained. Brandwatch, January 2. https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/the-facebook-algorithm-explained/
   Google Scholar
• Bro, Peter, and Filip Wallberg. 2015. “Gatekeeping in a Digital Era: Principles, Practices and Technological Platforms.” Journalism Practice 9 (1): 92–105. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.928468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2005. Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2018. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Digital Formations, Volume 113). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, Robyn. 2018. “Content or Context Moderation?” https://datasociety.net/library/content-or-context-moderation/.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Derek. 2006. “Deviant Case Analysis.” In The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods, edited by Victor Jupp. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9780857020116.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, Matteo. 2018. Facebook and Conversation Analysis. The Structure and Organization of Comment Threads. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Council for Mass Media. 2017. Tiedotusvälineen oma Instagram-sisältö on toimituksellista sisältöä, ruling on September 20. https://www.jsn.fi/uutiset/tiedotusvalineen-oma-instagram-tili-on-toimituksellista-sisaltoa/.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Council for Mass Media. 2021. Guidelines for journalists and an annex. http://www.jsn.fi/en/guidelines_for_journalists/.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Bob, ed. 2006. Local Journalism and Local Media. Making the Local News. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed. 2015. “Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of ‘Digital CA’.” Discourse, Context and Media 7: 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, Don. 2000. White News: Why Local News Programs Don’t Cover People of Color. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, Heikki. 2001. “Ohut ja vankka journalismi. Kansalaisuus suomalaisen journalismin käytännöissä 1990-luvulla.” Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University Press, Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Hermida, Alfred. 2020. “Post-Publication Gatekeeping: The Interplay of Publics, Platforms, Paraphernalia, and Practices in the Circulation of News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97 (2): 469–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Gail. 1974. “Error Correction as an International Resource.” Language in Society 2: 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Michael, Christer Clerwall, and Lars Nord. 2017. “Do Not Stand Corrected: Transparency and Users ́ Attitudes to Inaccurate News and Corrections in Online Journalism.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 94 (1): 148–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavada, Anastasia. 2015. “Social Media as Conversation: A Manifesto.” Social Media + Society 1 (1). doi:10.1177/2056305115580793.
   Google Scholar
• Kunelius, Risto. 2001. “Conversation: A Metaphor and a Method for Better Journalism?” Journalism Studies 2 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1080/14616700117091.
   Google Scholar
• Lauk, Epp, Margareta Salonen, and Aleksi Koski. 2019. LUOTSIVA. Research Report 2. University of Jyväskylä.   https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/65401 .
   Google Scholar
• Lauk, Epp, Margareta Salonen, and Niina Sormanen. 2018. LUOTSIVA. Research Report. University of Jyväskylä.   https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/59961.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, Kurt. 1947. “Channels of Group Life.” Human Relations 1 (2): 145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansikka, Ossi. 2019. Facebookin uumenissa pieni joukko moderoijia siivoaa suomalaisten törkyjä – “Välillä pelkään maailmankuvani ja optimismini puolesta.” Helsingin Sanomat, May 18. https://www.hs.fi/nyt/art-2000006109908.html.
   Google Scholar
• Marchionni, Doreen Marie. 2013. “Journalism-as-a-Conversation: A Concept Explication.” Communication Theory 23: 131–147. doi:10.1111/comt.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., et al. 2016. The Trusting News Project. https://trustingnews.org/trusting-news-project-2017/about-the-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Meraz, Sharon, and Zizi Papacharissi. 2013. “Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 18 (2): 138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, Joanne. 2017. “Analysing Technological Affordances of Online Interactions Using Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 115: 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, Joanne, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2014. “Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘Chat’ with Spoken Interaction.” Discourse & Communication 8 (2): 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Robert J. 2015. “Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis: Empirical Approaches to the Study of Digital Technology in Action.” In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, edited by Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brown, 217–235. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446282229.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Sigme Andi, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2020. “Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020.” https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Rasmus K, and Sarah A Ganter. 2018. “Dealing with Digital Intermediaries: A Case Study of the Relations Between Publishers and Platforms.” New Media & Society 20: 1600–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantti, Mervi. 2015. “Visual Gatekeeping in the Era of Networked Images: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Syrian Conflict.” In Gatekeeping in Transition, edited by Tim P. Vos and François Heinderyckx, 203–223. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pöyhtäri, Reeta, Paula Haara, and Pentti Raittila. 2013. Vihapuhe sananvapautta kaventamassa. Tampere: Suomen yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, Stephen D., and Pamela J. Shoemaker. 2016. “A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model.” Mass Communication and Society 19: 389–410. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Sarah T. 2016. “Commercial Content Moderation: Digital Laborers’ Dirty Work.” Media Studies Publications 12. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Aaron. 2012. “Centralized and Decentralized Gatekeeping in an Open Online Collective.” Politics & Society 40 (3): 349–388. doi:10.1177/0032329212449009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Tim P. Vos. 2009. Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Pamela J., Tim P. Vos, and Stephen D Reese. 2009. “Journalists as Gatekeepers.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 73–87. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data. A Guide to the Principles of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, Katri. 2019. “Instagram on Twitteriä suositumpi, ja Facebookissa ovat lähes kaikki – ‘Seuraamme tarkkaan, mikä lukijoihin puree’.” Suomen Lehdistö, August 27. https://suomenlehdisto.fi/instagram-on-twitteria-suositumpi-ja-facebookissa-ovat-lahes-kaikki-seuraamme-tarkkaan-mika-lukijoihin-puree/.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Jane B. 2014. “User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space.” New Media & Society 16 (1): 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensen, Steen, and Oscar Westlund. 2021. What is Digital Journalism Studies? New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Sarah J. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, Tim P. 2020. “Journalists as Gatekeepers.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies (Second Edition: ICA Handbook Series), edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 90–104. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, Tim P., and Frank Michael Russell. 2019. “Theorizing Journalism’s Institutional Relationships: An Elaboration of Gatekeeping Theory.” Journalism Studies 20 (16): 2331–2348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Julian. 2018. “Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The Rise of Individuals, Algorithms and Platforms in Digital News Dissemination.” Digital Journalism 6 (3): 274–293. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welbers, Kasper, and Michaël Opgenhaffen. 2018. “Social Media Gatekeeping: An Analysis of the Gatekeeping Influence on Newspapers’ Public Facebook Pages.” New Media & Society 20 (12): 4728–4747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, David M. 1950. “The ‘Gate Keeper:’ A Case Study in the Selection of News.” Journalism Quarterly 27: 383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamith, Rodrigo. 2019. “Algorithms and Journalism.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited by H. Örnebring, Y. Y. Chan, M. Carlson, S. Craft, M. Karlsson, H. Sjøvaag, and H. Wasserman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.779.
   Google Scholar