Dynamics of autotroph–mixotroph interactions with the intraguild predation structure

References

• M. Chen, M. Fan, R. Liu, X.Y. Wang, X. Yuan, and H.P. Zhu, The dynamics of temperature and light on the growth of phytoplankton, J. Theor. Biol. 385 (2015), pp. 8–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.W. Crane and J.P. Grover, Coexistence of mixotrophs, autotrophs, and heterotrophs in planktonic microbial communities, J. Theor. Biol. 262 (2010), pp. 517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.F. Edwards, Mixotrophy in nanoflagellates across environmental gradients in the ocean, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 (2019), pp. 6211–6220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Heggerud, H. Wang, and M.A. Lewis, Transient dynamics of a stoichiometric cyanobacteria model via multiple-scale analysis, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 80 (2020), pp. 1223–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D. Holt and G.A. Polis, A theoretical framework for intraguild predation, Am. Nat. 149 (1997), pp. 745–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Hsu, F.B. Wang, and X.Q. Zhao, A reaction-diffusion model of harmful algae and zooplankton in an ecosystem, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 451 (2017), pp. 659–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huisman and F.J. Weissing, Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments: An elementary model, Ecology 75 (1994), pp. 507–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huisman and F.J. Weissing, Competition for nutrients and light in a mixed water column: A theoretical analysis, Am. Nat. 146 (1995), pp. 536–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.E. Hutchinson, The paradox of the plankton, Am. Nat. 95 (1961), pp. 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Li, H. Wang, and Y. Kuang, Global analysis of a stoichiometric producer-grazer model with Holling type functional responses, J. Math. Biol. 63 (2011), pp. 901–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Loladze, Y. Kuang, and J.J. Elser, Stoichiometry in producer-grazer systems: Linking energy flow with element cycling, Bull. Math. Biol. 62 (2000), pp. 1137–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.Y. Lv, M. Fan, Y. Kang, and K. Blanco, Modeling refuge effect of submerged macrophytes in lake system, Bull. Math. Biol. 78 (2016), pp. 662–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mischaikow, H. Smith, and H.R. Thieme, Asymptotically autonomous semiflows: Chain recurrence and Lyapunov functions, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), pp. 1669–1685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.V. Moeller, M.G. Neubert, and M.D. Johnson, Intraguild predation enables coexistence of competing phytoplankton in a well-mixed water column, Ecology 100 (2019), Article ID e02874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nie, S.B. Hsu, and F.B. Wang, Steady-state solutions of a reaction-diffusion system arising from intraguild predation and internal storage, J. Differ. Equ. 266 (2019), pp. 8459–8491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nie, S.B. Hsu, and F.B. Wang, Global dynamics of a reaction-diffusion system with intraguild predation and internal storage, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 25 (2020), pp. 877–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Peace, Effects of light, nutrients, and food chain length on trophic efficiencies in simple stoichiometric aquatic food chain models, Ecol. Model. 312 (2015), pp. 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Peace and H. Wang, Compensatory foraging in stoichiometric producer-grazer models, Bull. Math. Biol. 81 (2019), pp. 4932–4950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Peng and X.Q. Zhao, A nonlocal and periodic reaction–diffusion–advection model of a single phytoplankton species, J. Math. Biol. 72 (2016), pp. 755–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Polis and R.D. Holt, Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions, Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (1992), pp. 151–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.B. Ryabov, L. Rudolf, and B. Blasius, Vertical distribution and composition of phytoplankton under the influence of an upper mixed layer, J. Theor. Biol. 263 (2010), pp. 120–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.R. Vasconcelos, S. Diehl, P. Rodríguez, P. Hedström, J. Karlsson, and P. Byström, Asymmetrical competition between aquatic primary producers in a warmer and browner world, Ecology97 (2016), pp. 2580–2592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, H.L. Smith, Y. Kuang, and J.J. Elser, Dynamics of stoichiometric bacteria-algae interactions in the epilimnion, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68 (2007), pp. 503–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wilken, J.M.H. Verspagen, S. Naus-Wiezer, E. Van Donk, and J. Huisman, Biological control of toxic cyanobacteria by mixotrophic predators: An experimental test of intraguild predation theory, Ecol. Appl. 24 (2014), pp. 1235–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wilken, J.M.H. Verspagen, S. Naus-Wiezer, E. Van Donk, and J. Huisman, Comparison of predator-prey interactions with and without intraguild predation by manipulation of the nitrogen source, Oikos 123 (2014), pp. 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wüest and A. Lorke, Small-scale hydrodynamics in lakes, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35 (2003), pp. 373–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Zhang, J.P. Shi, and X.Y. Chang, A mathematical model of algae growth in a pelagic-benthic coupled shallow aquatic ecosystem, J. Math. Biol. 76 (2018), pp. 1159–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Zhang, J.P. Shi, and X.Y. Chang, A model of algal growth depending on nutrients and inorganic carbon in a poorly mixed water column, J. Math. Biol. 83 (2021), p. 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Zhang, J.D. Kong, J.P. Shi, and H. Wang, Phytoplankton competition for nutrients and light in a stratified lake: A mathematical model connecting epilimnion and hypolimnion, J. Nonlinear Sci. 31 (2021), p. 35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.Q. Zhao, Dynamical Systems in Population Biology, Springer, New York, 2003.
   Google Scholar