References
- Aalberg, T. (2003). Achieving justice: Comparative public opinion on income distribution. Brill.
- Ansell, B. W., & Samuels, D. J. (2014). Inequality and democratization: An elite-competition approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Aspalter, C. (2002). Democratization and welfare state development in Taiwan. Ashgate.
- Baslevent, C., & Kirmanoglu, H. (2010). Discerning self-interested behaviour in attitudes towards welfare state responsibilities across Europe. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00751.x
- Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
- Breznau, N., & Hommerich, C. (2019). No generalizable effect of income inequality on public support for governmental redistribution among rich democracies 1987–2010. Social Science Research, 81, 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.03.013
- Busemeyer, M. R., Goerres, A., & Weschle, S. (2009). Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928709104736
- Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the american welfare state. Princeton University Press.
- Choi, Y. J. (2008). Pension policy and politics in East Asia. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308783431625
- Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
- Dallinger, U. (2010). Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences? Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374373
- Deyo, F. C. (1989). Beneath the miracle: Labor subordination in the new Asian industrialism. University of California Press.
- Dion, M. L., & Birchfield, V. (2010). Economic development, income inequality, and preferences for redistribution. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00589.x
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
- Finseraas, H. (2009). Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of european public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00211.x
- Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S.-H. C. (2017). Democratization, post-industrialization, and East Asian welfare capitalism: The politics of welfare state reform in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2017.1288158
- Fu, T.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Reforming public pensions in democratizing Korea and Taiwan: Actors, institutions and policy outcomes. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1353941
- Georgiadis, A., & Manning, A. (2012). Spend it like Beckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004. Public Choice, 151(3), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9758-7
- Gingrich, J., & Häusermann, S. (2015). The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556970
- Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and East Europe. Princeton University Press.
- Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2016). Dictators and democrats: Masses, elites, and regime change. Princeton University Press.
- Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48(4), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00279
- Holliday, I. (2005). East asian social policy in the wake of the financial crisis: Farewell to productivism? Policy and Politics, 33(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573052708465
- Hsiao, Y.-C., & Cheng, S.-F. (2014). Citizens’ perceptions of the left-right ideology in Taiwan: Replacing left-right ideology with the unification-independence issue to measure Taiwan’s party polarization. Taiwan Political Science Review, 18(2), 79–138. DOI:10.6683/TPSR.201412
- Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
- Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062083
- Karakoç, E. (2018). Inequality after the transition: Political parties, party systems, and social policy in southern and postcommunist Europe. Oxford University Press.
- Kenworthy, L., & McCall, L. (2008). Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwm006
- Kim, H., Huh, S., Choi, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Perceptions of inequality and attitudes towards redistribution in four East Asian welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12266
- Kim, M. M. S. (2015). Comparative welfare capitalism in East Asia: Productivist models of social policy. Palgrave.
- Kim, Y. M. (2008). Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308783431652
- Korpi, W. (1989). Power, politics, and state autonomy in the development of social citizenship: Social rights during sickness in eighteen OECD countries since 1930. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095608
- Ku, Y.-W., & Chang, Y.-F. (2017). To be or not to be part of greater China: Social development in the Post-Ma Taiwan. Social Policy & Administration, 51(6), 898–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12338
- Kumlin, S. (2004). the personal and the political: How personal welfare states experiences affect political trust and ideology. Palgrave.
- Kumlin, S., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2014). Citizens, policy feedback, and European welfare states. In S. Kumlin & I. Stadelmann-Steffen (Eds.), How welfare states shape the democratic public: Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes (pp. 3–16). Edward Elgar.
- Lee, C.-S. (2005). Income inequality, democracy, and public sector size. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000108
- Lee, S.-H. C. (2018). Democratization, political parties and Korean welfare politics: Korean family policy reforms in comparative perspective. Government and Opposition, 53(3), 518–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.44
- Lee, Y. J., & Ku, Y. W. (2007). East Asian welfare regimes: Testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state. Social Policy & Administration, 41(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00547.x
- Lübker, M. (2007). Inequality and the demand for redistribution: Are the assumptions of the new growth theory valid? Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl002
- Lue, J.-D. (2014). Globalisation, democratisation and the institutional transformation of Taiwan’s welfare regime. Social Policy and Society, 13(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641300064X
- Lühiste, K. (2013). Social protection and satisfaction with democracy: A multi-level analysis. Political Studies, 62(4), 784–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12080
- Marx, P. (2016). The insider-outsider divide and economic voting: Testing a new theory with German electoral data. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu022
- Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013
- Midtbø, T. (2018). Democracy and the demand for government redistribution: A survey analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12253
- Nadeau, R., Daoust, J.-F., & Arel-Bundock, V. (2020). The market, the state and satisfaction with democracy. West European Politics, 43(1), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1603655
- Norris, P. (1999). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 1–27). Oxford University Press.
- Peng, I., & Wong, J. (2008). Institutions and institutional purpose: Continuity and change in East Asian social policy. Politics & Society, 36(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329207312180
- Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710
- Quaranta, M. (2018). How citizens evaluate democracy: An assessment using the European social survey. European Political Science Review, 10(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000054
- Rehm, P. (2016). Risk inequality and welfare states: Social policy preferences, development, and dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
- Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge University Press.
- Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000051
- Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2019). Who wants what? Redistribution preferences in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
- Shapiro, I. (2003). The state of democratic theory. Princeton University Press.
- Sirovátka, T., Guzi, M., & Saxonberg, S. (2019). Satisfaction with democracy and perceived performance of the welfare state in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718757685
- Svallfors, S., Kulin, J., & Schnabel, A. (2012). Age, class, and attitudes toward government responsibilities. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Contested welfare states: Welfare attitudes in Europe and Beyond (pp. 158–192). Stanford University Press.
- Swenson, P. A. (2004). Varieties of capitalist interests: Power, institutions, and the regulatory welfare state in the United States and Sweden. Studies in American Political Development, 18(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X0400001X
- Tang, K.-L. (2000). Social welfare development in East Asia. St. Martin’s Press.
- Tsai, M.-C. (2001). Dependency, the state and class in the neoliberal transition of Taiwan. Third World Quarterly, 22(3), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590120061651
- Wilding, P. (2008). Is the East Asian welfare model still productive? Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520840701835815
- Wong, J. (2004). Healthy democracies: Welfare politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Cornell University Press.
- Yang, -J.-J. (2017). The political economy of the small welfare state in South Korea. Cambridge University Press.
- Yang, N. (2017). East Asia in transition: Re-examining the East Asian welfare model using fuzzy sets. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2016.1258525
- Yeh, C.-Y., Cheng, H., & Shi, S.-J. (2020). Public–private pension mixes in East Asia: Institutional diversity and policy implications for old-age security. Ageing and Society, 40(3), 604–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001137